mwangi simon thuku f21 2492 2009 supervisors mr orodi odhiambo eng d a mutuli n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Mwangi Simon Thuku F21/2492/2009 Supervisors : Mr. Orodi Odhiambo PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Mwangi Simon Thuku F21/2492/2009 Supervisors : Mr. Orodi Odhiambo

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 22

Mwangi Simon Thuku F21/2492/2009 Supervisors : Mr. Orodi Odhiambo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 159 Views
  • Uploaded on

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI ENVIRONMENTAL & BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING. Design of a biological slaughterhouse wastewater treatment system (Using an anaerobic baffle reactor – constructed wetland system) < case study of Kiserian Slaughterhouse>. Mwangi Simon Thuku F21/2492/2009

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Mwangi Simon Thuku F21/2492/2009 Supervisors : Mr. Orodi Odhiambo' - gwendolyn-colon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
mwangi simon thuku f21 2492 2009 supervisors mr orodi odhiambo eng d a mutuli

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI

ENVIRONMENTAL & BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING

Design of a biological slaughterhouse wastewater treatment system (Using an anaerobic baffle reactor – constructed wetland system) < case study of Kiserian Slaughterhouse>

Mwangi Simon Thuku

F21/2492/2009

Supervisors : Mr. Orodi Odhiambo

Eng. D. A. Mutuli

background
BACKGROUND

Approximated slaughterhouse waste content and NEMA standards for disposal into the environment

Johns et al., 1995; Manjunath et al., 2000, NEMA

slide3

BACKGROUNDCont’d

Treatment Options

  • Anaerobic treatment + activated sludge
  • Anaerobic treatment + contact aeration
  • Activated sludge + chemical coagulation
  • Contact aeration + chemical coagulation.
problem statement
Problem Statement
  • This waste water flows to R. Kiserian and eventually gets to Kiserian Dam.
  • This causes eutrophication and anoxia in the water bodies.
  • Waste from slaughterhouses also leads to air and soil pollution

Pre- treated Wastewater getting into the streams

slide5

Site Analysis

  • Kiserian is a settlement in Kajiado county
  • Habitants are mainly pastoralist community
  • Warm and Temperate climate.
  • Rainfall =833mm
  • Temperature = 17.8
objectives
Objectives

Overall objective

To design a biological slaughterhouse wastewater treatment systemSpecific Objectives

To analyze the amount and the content of wastewater

To establish pertinent parameters for design of a biological slaughterhouse waste water treatment system.

To use the parameters from (ii) to size the baffle reactor and the constructed wetland.

statement of the scope
Statement of the scope
  • Survey work
  • Carrying out tests
  • Determination of System Design Parameters
  • Making detailed engineering drawings

Literature review

  • Treatment Process ( primary, secondary and tertiary treatment)
  • Why anaerobic?
  • Anaerobic Baffle reactor (improved septic tank)
  • Constructed Wetland
slide8

Methodology

Survey

Soil and waste water sampling

Laboratory tests (soil & waste water)

Determining the efficiency of ABR

ABR volume determination

Result analysis

Designing the wetland

Structural design of the ABR

slide9

Theoretical Framework

Chemical oxygen demand,

Biochemical Oxygen Demand, BOD5,mg/L =

Sasse (1998), Wanasen (2003), Foxon et al., (2004) etc

slide11

Results Cont’d

Leslie C.P. et al, 1999

slide12

Results Cont’d

Qi = 14.5m3/d

y = 0.7 m

As =

126.22 m2

t = 1.85 days

width = 7.94 m

dh = 0.01 x 15 = 0.15m

Length = 2 x 9 = 16 m

slope is taken to be 1.5

slide18

Conclusion

  • Objectives of the design project were met.
  • slaughterhouse wastewater was observed to have high content of waste.
  • The BOD5 removal efficiency for the ABR was found to be 90% (i.e. from 936.25mg/l to 93.625mg/l) with a HRT of 2.38days. The organic lading in the ABR was found to be 1.314 kg COD/m3.d (should range between 1 – 3 kg COD/m3.d).
  • The CW reduced the concentration of nitrates in the waste water from 141.5 mg/l to 100 mg/l and the BOD from 93.625mg/l to 15.62mg/l.
  • System was found to have a 98.4% BOD reduction
slide19

Recommendations

  • The first compartment of the ABR should be modified and increased in size to trap as much solids as possible.
  • The ABR should be made air tight and a system to improve/increase the pressure of the biogas in the reactor to allow gas collection otherwise the first compartment can be constructed in such a way that it has a gas holder and made airtight (shape of a fixed dome).
  • A gradient should be created between the ABR and the CW so as to utilize gravity as the driving force.
  • Wastewater monitoring/ testing should be done on a regular basis in order to ensure that the content of waste flowing to the stream conforms with the NEMA standards and as a way of monitoring the performance of the system.
slide20

References

  • Muench, E. (2008): Overview of anaerobic treatment options for sustainable sanitation systems. In: BGR Symposium "Coupling Sustainable Sanitation and Groundwater Protection".
  • Bachmann, A., Beard, VL. and McCarty, PL. (1985). Performance Characteristics of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor. Water Research 19 (1): 99–106.
  • Sergio S. Domingos (2011), Thesis on Vertical flow constructed wetlands for the treatment of inorganic industrial wastewater, Murdoch University WA, Australia.
  • Morel A. and Diener S. (2006). Greywater Management in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Review of diff erent treatment systems for households or neighbourhoods. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag). Dubendorf, Switzerland.
  • Nijaguna B.T. (2002), Biogas Technology, New Age International (P) Limited, New Delhi.
slide21

References

  • Rustige H &Platzer Chr. (2000),Nutrient Removal in Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Application in sensitive Regions in: Proceedings – 7th Int. Conf. On Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Orlando, USA
  • Leslie Grady .C, Glen .T, (1999), Biological Wastewater treatment, 2nded, Maral Dekker ,Inc, New York
  • Foxon KM, Pillay S, Lalbahadur T, Rodda N, Holder F, Buckley CA (2004) The anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR): An appropriate technology for on-site sanitation. Water South Africa 30, 44-50.
  • Lawrence A.W. and McCarty p.L (1970): Unified basis for biological Treatment Design and Operation. J. Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. CivEngrs.
  • Walter R.H., Shermah R.M. and Downing D.L. (1974): Reduction in Oxygen demand of abattoir effluent by Precipitation with metal. J. Agric. FdChem