1 / 18

Innovation and Competitiveness clusters Policy in France

Innovation and Competitiveness clusters Policy in France. Alain GRIOT TUSIAD SEMINAR Istanbul January 6 - 2009. French industrial situation. Too small number of SMEs Too large proportion of very small enterprises (more than 85 % of companies have less than 10 people);

gunnar
Download Presentation

Innovation and Competitiveness clusters Policy in France

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Innovation and Competitiveness clusters Policyin France Alain GRIOT TUSIAD SEMINAR Istanbul January 6 - 2009

  2. French industrial situation • Too small number of SMEs • Too large proportion of very small enterprises (more than 85 % of companies have less than 10 people); • low specialization of industry; • small and medium enterprises (less than 500 staff) are representing only 16 % (2004) of industrial research expenses; • Strategic positioning : • to fight against low wages countries, the solution is to increase competitiveness of the economy by promoting breakdown technologies, therefore to encourage innovation..

  3. French innovation situation • The aim: increase research and development expenses in companies in order to reach the Lisbon agenda objectives: 3% GDP for R&D in 2010. • But • French SMEs are underperforming regarding their European competitors: • 19,7 % of French SMEs are investing in R&D in house (32 % in Germany and 30 % in Sweden); • 35,9 % of French SMEs are investing in non technologic innovation (53,9 % in Germany and 44 % in Sweden). • To increase the industrial R&D expenses is mandatory : • Lisbon objective: 3 % of GDP in 2010 , French situation 2,11 % (European Innovation Scoreboard 2007) • French Private expenses in R&D are too small R&D ( 1,32 % of GDP, vs1,76 % in Germany, 1,87 % in the states et 2,40 % in Japan) • 0,1% increase in R&D intensity leads to the creation of 0,3 to 0,4 % regarding the GDP per inhabitant  » (European Commission, 2005)

  4. The tools for a performing innovation policy • The innovation policy is a mix of : • tax relieve measures for innovative enterprises and investors • Direct financing for projects • Involvement of all level of public authorities: the central government, the regional authorities,…:

  5. Tax measures: a main reform, the research tax credit (CIR) • CIR is a tax rebate for companies investing in R&D, with the objective to increase the private R&D expenses • The scheme has been ameliorated in 2008, in order to be more attractive for companies; they can now: • Benefit of reduction of 30% of their expenses up to 100 millions euro, 5% after this threshold • For companies investing for the first time in R&D, the level of rebate is upgraded to 5O% the first year of application, 40%% the second year. • The reimbursement can be immediate (and non during the year following the expenses) if companies are considered as young innovative enterprises or growing companies (more than 15% growth/year) • In 2005, 5400 companies, investing 13.5 billion euro in R&D were benefiting of the scheme, for a public cost of 981 million euro. • 40% of this amount was dedicated to companies of less than 50 staff • For the coming years the estimation for the cost of the scheme is 3 billion euro/year.

  6. Performing measures for SMEs: the young innovative enterprise (JEI) and the young university enterprise (JEU) status. • The young innovative enterprise status: • 5 criteria of which: Less than 8 years old, More than 15% of total expenses dedicated to R&D • Advantages: • Tax rebates • Exemptions of social contributions for the employees taking part in research • A significant result (2006) : • 1700 companies, • staff concerned : 9600 • budgetary cost for the State: 92 million euro • The Young university enterprise status: • own for more than 10% by a student ore a searcher, • for the valorization of research works of high grade education bodies (universities, high schools) • the JEU is benefiting the same advantages than the JEI • The scheme started in January 2008

  7. Direct financing: the new OSEO Agency • January 2008: merging between two agencies: AII and OSEO : • to give a new impulse to R&D in high potential SMEs and allow the creation of more intermediate enterprises (staff between 250 and 5000) in breakdown technologies sectors, • To promote the partnership in innovation projects • To simplify the innovation financing frame, with a single financing point • To offer companies an unique interlocutor all along their life • A new unit has been created within OSEO Innovation • Dedicated to cooperative projects • For aid amount of up to 10 million Euros • This unit is in charge of managing, since the beginning of 2009, the financing of “poles de compétitivité” projects • The industrial strategic innovation (ISI) scheme allows to focus on collaborative projects concerning the more risky innovation

  8. The National Research Agency • Under the responsibility of the ministry in charge of research: from a structural to a project based research financing • The scope: to finance research projects from the scientific community, on the basis of call for tenders and with a peer evaluation of the projects • A particular focus is put on private-public partnership and involvement of enterprises in the projects, with an objective of technology transfer and valorization of public research by the companies. • Some figures • 2005 2006 2007 • Number of projects 1 400 1 622 1 430 • selectivity 27 % 25 % 25 % • Finacing amounts (ME) 539 621 607 • % of SMEs 8,2 % 7,8 % 7,4 % • % of large companies 9,2 % 9,9 % 7,7 % • Number of poles projects 330 242 282 • Amount for poles projects 199 175 191

  9. THE COMPETITIVESS CLUSTER POLICY

  10. Policy aims • Identifying high-potential clusters and focus public aids on them • avoiding scattering of public subsidies • Strengthening the link between research & industry • promoting industry-driven research programs • developing the “triple helix relationship” between firms, research centres and higher education institutions • Developing a full ecosystem • Education, private financing (business angels, VC,…) IP management, entrepreneurship, international development, …;

  11. What are they? • A competitiveness cluster is : • a gathering of firms, research centres & higher education institutions, • working on joint projects (mainly R&D projects) • with a dedicated governance body (non-profit organization), and • with dedicated public oversight bodies • All « clusters » are different : • different strategies • different priorities (outside R&D) • different organisations (1 to 10 dedicated staff) • ...but they all have to: • define an innovation and development strategy, and • implement a road-map to achieve it • favour SMEs development • Other priorities, depending on the cluster: • education • recruitment • international partnerships • service delivery toward SMEs... • growth financing, … • Priorities must depend on the strategy !

  12. Where are they? The Competitiveness Clusters in France. 17 are global ones 54 are national

  13. Key factors of success • Involvement of firms (as opposed to involvement of public authorities or to involvement of public research centres) • Public authorities have to help and support, but not decide • e.g. the cluster strategy must be decided by the cluster governance (i.e. firms) • Each cluster needs a specific support policy (at local level) • i.e. no « one size fits all » ! • All local innovation services must be cluster-oriented • i.e. it may request changing pre-existing organizations approach • The cluster policy must be enforced in the long-term • e.g. time-to-market in R&D projects is a least 2 to 3 years • cluster policy needs 5-10 years to get a strong impact

  14. Pôles 2.0: the second stage of the policy • End of 2007 and early 2008: national evaluation conducted by Boston Consulting Group and CM International. • Evaluation of both the global policy and each cluster individually • Methodology of evaluation of public policy • Dedicated means • Consistency with other public policies (R&D and innovation) • Clusters selection process • Financing support processes • Policy management at national and local levels • Synergy between actors • First effects on local actors

  15. Pôles 2.0: the second stage of the policy • Evaluation of each competitiveness cluster - 7 points of scope • Economic and international strategy • Cluster government and animation, evolution of the cluster population • R&D projects and firms-public research-training synergy • Territorial settlement and network strengthening, structural projects • SME’s integration and new enterprises creation • Human resources training • Green development approach

  16. Pôles 2.0: the second stage of the policy • The main conclusions of the evaluation • At the global policy level • Policy aims are validated • The competitiveness clusters policy is recognized as successful • Number of competitiveness clusters have created, during the first phase a dynamics of cooperation between actors of innovation (Enterprises, Research Centers, University) • At the clusters level • 39 clusters are fully in line with the aim of the policy • 19 clusters have to improve some aspects of their operations to fulfill the objectives of the policy • 13 clusters need a large reconfiguration of their action in order to fulfill the objectives of the policy.

  17. Pôles 2.0: the second stage of the policy • Launched by president Sarkozy on 26th June 2008 (the Limoges Speech) • A new 3 years period ( 2009-2011) for growth of the clusters and to achieve world class clusters • Financing by the state for innovation projects: 1.5 billion Euros for the 3 years period • A stress on private financing involvement in the innovation process managed by the clusters • A stress put on SME’s involvement in clusters • A strengthening of contract based relationship between clusters and public authorities • Strategic roadmaps • Development of a competitive ecosystem • Contract of objectives (to be negotiated before end of march 2009and signed before the end of June 2009

  18. Fore more informationon french Competitiveness clusters: www.competitivite.gouv.fr Thank you for your attention

More Related