Food Under Fire: Risk in the Public Sphere By Shane Morris - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Food Under Fire: Risk in the Public Sphere By Shane Morris PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Food Under Fire: Risk in the Public Sphere By Shane Morris

play fullscreen
1 / 24
Food Under Fire: Risk in the Public Sphere By Shane Morris
Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Food Under Fire: Risk in the Public Sphere By Shane Morris

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. University of Guelph Centre for Safe Food, Department of Plant Agriculture. Food Under Fire: Risk in the Public Sphere By Shane Morris

  2. Manifestation of attitudes! - Humour

  3. OUTLINE • Risk in Food • Risk Theory • Biopolitics and social actors • Examples of Biopolitics: 1.Rats and Risks 2.Biopolitical Resistance to Resistance Genes • Consumers and Risk - Model Farm Project • Organic report • Take home

  4. Risk Types in Food • Health Risks • Environmental Risks • Social and Economic Risks • Ethical and Moral Risks

  5. Irish Biodiversity Failure!

  6. Risk Theory • Risk Components: • What is Risk Analysis ?Risk Assessment: characterizing risk mathematically • Risk Management? - deciding what to do about the risk • Risk Communication ? - explaining the risk - the method of understanding scientific and technological risk and how it is communicated within a socio-political structure - Interactive process of information and opinion exchange among individuals, groups and institutions

  7. Identifying Issues Assessing Risk & Benefit Evaluating Results Public Identifying and Analyzing Options Implementing the Strategy Selecting a Strategy Risk Communication Model

  8. Risk Communication Points Good risk communication : to facilitate an informed understanding of the risks andbenefits (William Leiss, Pres. Royal Society of Canada, web site) SAFETY Rules of Risk Issue Management (Leiss): 1. Understand Risk Issue Management 2. Risk Issue Forecasting “intensity of backlash surprised” KW-Record Feb. 22, 2001 3. Become fully engaged 4. Be proactive 5. Stay in for the long haul

  9. Public Sphere a domain of our social life in which such a thing as public opinion can be formed. Habermas: in the public sphere discourse becomes democratic through the "non-coercively unifying, consensus building force of a discourse in which participants overcome their at first subjectively biased views in favor of a rationally motivated agreement"

  10. GM Sugar beet trials, 1999 GM Food In Ireland - To Date only Experimental Field Trials

  11. Social Actors in Irish media • Fundamentalist Critique Coalition • neo-modernist movement/ reflexive modernization (Beck) • New Left Coalition • fusion of the socialist frame of international equity with that of environmentalist protection • Counter Science Expertise Coalition • “bad science” - scientists • Biotechnology Solution Coalition • Those support of technology: (a) Commercial • (b) Positive

  12. Biopolitics as the politicization of modern biotechnology issues within the political stream that can influence public policy at local, national and international levels. The concept of the political stream is derived from John Kingdon's book called Agenda, Alternatives and Public Policies (1984). (2000, Trends in Biotech) Local: School boards in the UK banning GM food in dinners National: Field trials International: EU member states or Biosafety Protocol

  13. Meath Chronicle April 1999

  14. Rats and Risks Imagine………………... This formulation of naturally occurring pesticides is perfect for organic gardeners The Lancet , Jan. 2001

  15. Antibiotic Resistance Genes Belgium: (December, 1999) "The fact that the feed or food has a transgenic origin, implicating or not the insertion of transcriptionally-functional antibiotic resistance gene should not mathematically modify significantly the global probability of gene transfer from natural bacteria." French: (April 2000) The resistance gene (nptII) meets these criteria. Therefore, it can be used in plant transgenesis." EU: (April 2000)“No scientific evidence that all GMO of this type (Ab-resis.) present adverse effects to human health or the environment.” BUT “I am fully aware of the political importance...of proposed amendments” Canada: (Feb. 2001) Royal Society recommended a ban on Ab-resis.

  16. MODEL FARM PROJECT Bt vs. Conventional Sweet Corn • Bt Sweet Corn • No insecticides • No fungicide • Herbicide and fertilizer applications were the same for both Bt and Conventional in all plantings • Conventional • Planting 1: 3 Carbofuran applications • Planting 2: 2 Carbofuran and 1 pyrethroid • Planting 3: 1 carbofuran and 2 pyrethroid

  17. MODEL FARM PROJECT Bt vs Conventional Potatoes • Bt Potatoes • No insecticides • 20% less fertilizer • 2 fungicide applications • Conventional • 2 applications of:Admire OR Actara OR • 3 Bt applications. • 2 fungicide • 1 cymbush


  19. Bt and Regular Sweet Corn Sales • Bt Sweet Corn: 680 dozen • Regular Sweet corn: 452 dozen • Recorded until the regular was no longer saleable • Ratio of Almost 3:2 • Many people bought some of each • The Bt sweet corn had a longer shelf life

  20. Organic

  21. Organic Risks and Benefits in Ireland • Benefits: • positive public perceptions • Market premiums • direct selling potential • extra employment • some organic systems fit well with part-time farming • Risks: • labour shortages • depends on economic buoyancy • lack of year round supply - Irish weather!! • price premiums may fall because:supply incease or retailer competition • retailer lack of commitment East Cork Regional Office (EU Leader Project)

  22. Biopolitics, Risk Communication and the Public Sphere All (‘bio-’) politics is local! All politics is local!

  23. Take Home “I know of no safe depository of the ultimate power of society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened to exercise their own control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion” Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820

  24. Thank You Any Questions?…...