1 / 22

Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes

Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes. Stakeholder Forum June 14, 2010. Challenges Facing the Texas Child Welfare System. Imbalance in geographic distribution of services and providers

grohde
Download Presentation

Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes Stakeholder ForumJune 14, 2010

  2. Challenges Facing the Texas Child Welfare System • Imbalance in geographic distribution of services and providers • Insufficient number of residential providers that offer a full continuum of services

  3. Current Equation (Child’s Needs) + (Lack of Community Resources) = • Placement outside of home community • Increased number of changes in placement • Separation from sibling(s) and family • Lack of educational continuity • Fractured social support system

  4. Goal of Redesign "The goal of the (foster care) redesign is to improve outcomes for children and families by creating sustainable placement resources in communities that will meet the service needs of children and youth in foster care, using the least restrictive placement settings."

  5. Redesigning the Equation (Child’s Needs) + (Adequate Community Resources) = • Placement in home community • Decreased number of changes in placement • Placement with sibling(s) in close proximity to family • Educational continuity • Strong social support system

  6. Project Objectives • Determine where and what kind of services are needed • Determine how to contract for quality services, including recommended outcomes, performance measures and procurement processes • Determine how to pay for those services (fiscal system/payment methodologies that align incentives with process and quality objectives)

  7. Project Parameters • Case management will remain the role of DFPS, however, model can include expanding role of the private sector’s work with families • System design will neither preclude nor require additional funding

  8. Decision-Making Approach • Analyze/consider data • Identify and define problems • Generate options and assess feasibility of options • Develop models that ‘test’ hypotheses and their corresponding policy, programmatic, practice and fiscal manifestations • Engage stakeholders in reviewing/refining the analysis • Final recommendations and a plan for implementing new foster care system due by December 31, 2010

  9. Technical and Planning Expertise DFPS has contracted with two entities who are working collaboratively to develop the redesign proposal: • PDF Group, LLC: - Engaging stakeholders - Managing, planning and developing the proposal, including recommendations for a systemic, effective approach to remodeling the current foster care system • Chapin Hall, University of Chicago: - Working with American Humane - Facilitating and coordinating fact-finding research - Obtaining stakeholder input and support - Analyzing data and conducting simulation modeling

  10. Goal – Children spend less time in care. How – Provider establishes network of foster homes in counties where demand exceeds supply Result – Proximity equals support and minimal escalation of behavioral issues Impact – Reduced placement disruptions; children achieve permanency more quickly Fiscal – Lower levels of need; less time in care resulting in a reduction in revenue for provider (improved outcomes create disincentive for provider) Leverage – (Through redesign) Provider is able to reinvest a % of the revenue the state would have otherwise paid for child to remain in care at higher level of need. It’s A Winning Scenario!

  11. Stakeholders • Children and families • Judiciary • Providers • Foster care network/association • Child advocates • DFPS field staff • Others which include, but are not limited to: - HHSC, Medicaid, and other enterprise agencies - Texas child welfare boards - State and federal child welfare partners

  12. Public Private Partnership (PPP) Representative of key stakeholder groups including: • Foster youth alumni • Providers • Child advocates • Judiciary • DFPS Advisory Council • DFPS executive leadership Role in the redesign effort: • Provide guidance to the initiative • Serve as conduit of communication between constituents and peers • Propose recommendations to DFPS Commissioner

  13. Communications Principles • Fully engage stakeholders - Provide opportunities for meaningful input - Keep stakeholders fully informed of project status • Ensure understanding of Foster Care Redesign project objectives • Provide all information in an inclusive, transparent manner to ensure project integrity • Provide opportunities for the Department to understand and stay current on stakeholder interests and opinions

  14. Communications Methods • Website - Project updates and notices - Project survey - Mailbox • Alerts • In-person meetings • E-mail • Briefings • Stakeholder forum

  15. Communications Progress • Stakeholders around the state have been engaged in project activities since January 11, 2010 • Project website, mailbox and survey were launched in April 2010 - 622 public and private stakeholders responded - 95 Texas counties represented in survey responses • Over 600 public and private stakeholders have been involved in face-to-face meetings - Regional provider meetings - Focus groups - Stakeholder initiated presentations and meetings • More planned stakeholder forums coming

  16. External Stakeholder Input Systemic (Primarily Provider Issues) • Eliminate Billing Service Level • More Predictability Regarding Number and Type of Placements • Want Better “Up-Front” Assessments • Want to Work With Families of Children They are Caring For

  17. Internal Stakeholder Input • Concerns • Will Something Really Happen? • How Will Implementation Impact My Workload? • Fiscal and Political Implications • Ideas • Eliminate Billing Service Level • Eliminate “Leveling” Based on Behavior

  18. Stakeholder Consensus • Quality Indicators • Continuum of Services • Services to Child; Not Child to Services • De-Link Authorized and Billing Service Levels

  19. Child Outcomes • Improved child functioning as indicated by a decrease in intensity of service need while in care • More timely achievement of permanency - Reunification - Adoption - Permanent and legal placement with relatives

  20. Quality Indicators • Children are placed in their home communities • Children are appropriately served in the least restrictive environment that supports minimal moves for the child • Connections to family and others important to the child are maintained • Children are placed with siblings • Services respect the child’s culture

  21. Stakeholder Question Given the agency’s current budget constraints, what cost-neutral suggestions do you have to improve outcomes that support children being: - Placed in their home communities? - Appropriately served in the least restrictive environment that supports minimal moves? - Connected to family and other individuals important to them? - Placed with siblings? - Offered services that respect their culture?

  22. Questions or Additional Comments? Email: FCRedesign@dfps.state.tx.us Information will also be posted to our website at www.dfps.state.tx.us/Child_Protection/Foster_Care/redesign.asp

More Related