1 / 21

Graham Thompson The National Trust The Giant’s Causeway Project

Graham Thompson The National Trust The Giant’s Causeway Project. NAAONB Annual Conference University of Ulster at Coleraine Thursday 9 July 2009. The Giant’s Causeway. Formed 60m years ago Uncovered 15,000 years ago Discovered 300 years ago Foundations of geological science

Download Presentation

Graham Thompson The National Trust The Giant’s Causeway Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Graham ThompsonThe National TrustThe Giant’s Causeway Project NAAONB Annual Conference University of Ulster at Coleraine Thursday 9 July 2009

  2. The Giant’s Causeway • Formed 60m years ago • Uncovered 15,000 years ago • Discovered 300 years ago • Foundations of geological science • Acquired 50 years ago

  3. Tourism and the Causeway • Grand tour icon • Portrush and Portstewart • Hydro-electric tramway • New facilities • Northern Ireland’s premier attraction

  4. Causeway Designations • World Heritage Site • Special Area of Conservation • Area of Special Scientific Interest • National Nature Reserve • The heart of an AONB

  5. Competing Priorities • The need to raise conservation standards • The need to protect the setting of the site • The need to promote tourism • The need to maintain income streams • The need to provide an holistic visitor experience • The need to replace facilities lost by fire • The need to provide an integrated management structure • The need to solve existing traffic and transport issues • The need to give ownership of the site to the local community

  6. Attempts to move forward • Government led initiatives • The Consarc Report • Moyle Competition • ETI Committee approach • 2003 Ministerial Initiative

  7. 3 stranded approach • WHS management plan • Tourism masterplan • International Competition for new facilities • Underlined by co-ordinated stakeholder approach

  8. Stakeholder Objectives • Environmental sustainability • Financial sustainability • Economic regeneration • World class visitor experience • International Best Practice • Civic Pride

  9. Progress and interruptions • Tourism Masterplan agreed in 2003 • WHS plan adopted in 2005 • International Competition held in 2005 • heneghan.peng appointed

  10. Process “postponed” in 2007 • Value for money • Traffic and parking issues • “Alternative application”

  11. Moving forward • Public outcry • Moyle and Trust agreement • Viability assessment and assumption of lead • Transfer of Architects and design team • Planning submission and approval

  12. What the centre will contain • Interpretation and exhibition • Orientation • Tourist information • Catering • Retail • Toilets etc.

  13. More than a building • Co-ordinated single management approach • High quality interpretation across the site • Improved trail and path networks • Transportation improvements • Conservation improvements • Increased stakeholder involvement and engagement plan • Better learning, educational and research opportunities • Integrated activity Plan

  14. Funding National Trust £4m allocated HLF £3m stage 1 approval DETI/NITB £9.25m in process Other sources £2.25m in process Total £18.5m Visit www.agiantcause.com

  15. The real story There was a giant called Finn MacCool…………..

More Related