Action Research Presentation. Margaret Farren Bernie Tobin Dublin City University November 2005. Purpose of presentation. Action research approach is presented as a rigorous and valid form of research. Research.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Dublin City University
Action research approach is presented as a rigorous and valid form of research.
Research is systematic, criticaland self-critical enquiry which aims to contribute to the advancement of knowledge. (Bassey, 1995)
The choice of research practice depends on the questions that are asked and the questions asked depend on their context.
(Denzin and Lincoln, 1998)
Search for generalisations requires the investigation of large populations, usually studied by appropriate sampling, and by intention leads to statements which can be used to predict what will occur in other situations.
Study of Singularity can be investigation of something quite small. It cannot be used to predict probabilities, but it can be related to other situations, it may be valuable.
Research in educational settings is only educational research if it is concerned with attempts to improve educational judgement and decisions. Research in educational settings which aims to develop sociological theory, psychological theory, philosophical constructs or historical ideas is not educational research, but sociological, psychological, philosophical or historical research in educational settings.
(Bassey. M., 1995)
We should think about practice as a setting not only for the application of knowledge but for its generation. We should ask not only how practitioners can better apply the results of academic research, but what kinds of knowing are already embedded in competent practice.
Schon, D. (1995)
Sparkes (2002) discusses how attempts to impose inappropriate criteria on work that is different from one’s own…builds in failure from the start so that the legitimacy of other research forms is systematically denied. The research community is in a “no win” situation in which researchers offer blind allegiance to their own particular paradigmatic positions and refuse to acknowledge the contribution that other ways of knowing can make to our understanding.
The need to challenge the assumptions that the term ‘theory’ exclusively refers to generalisable representations of events, which can only be produced under conditions that are dissociated from the intentions of agents to effect change in practical situations.
Elliott, J. (2004)
Action (that is, change)
Research (that is, understanding)
Bob Dick (1999)Action research as an epistemology of practice
Identify initial idea:
Cycle 1 (continued)
Monitor implementation and effects
Are the descriptions and explanations of teacher-researcher’s educational development presented within a form and content that can be publicly tested for validity?
Does the research do the things it claims to do, and can the reader believe the results?
Habermas (1976) states that the criteria required to judge the legitimacy of knowledge claims are that:
the methodology which best allows the researcher to conduct systematic inquiry in order to present a warranted assertion – that is the methodology is fit for a given function.
(Winter, R., 1989)
Dialectical critique/Risk Disturbance:
Collaborative Resource/Plural structure:
Theory, Practice, Transformation:
East Anglia School of Action Research: John Elliot
The 'Deakin' School of Action Research:Wilfred Carr and Stephen Kemmis:
Community Action Research – Australia: Ernie Stringer
Higher Education: Zubber-Skerrit
University of Bath School of Action Research: Jack Whitehead
When evaluating we define and describe the problem to be investigated and the context in which it is set. Wealso describe what all the participants (educators,group members, managers etc.) have been doing.
Think - interpreting and explaining.
When evaluating we analyse and interpret the situation.
We reflect onwhat participants have been doing.
We look at areas ofsuccess and any deficiencies, issues or problems.
Act - resolving issues and problems. In evaluation wejudge the worth, effectiveness, appropriateness, andoutcomes of those activities. We act to formulate solutions to any problems.Stringer: Community Action Research
validation group. (Whitehead, J.1989)
“How does one conduct action research? is replaced with the question….
“How does one conduct a life that includes the practice of action research?
…….. With this question, epistemological concerns are linked with ontological ones.
…….. Who one is becomes linked with what one knows and does.
An epistemology is a theory of knowledge.
It answers questions about who can be a ‘knower’,
What tests beliefs must pass in order to be legitimated as knowledge.
Bassey, M. (1995). Creating Education Through Research: A Global Perspective of Educational Research for the 21st Century. Kirklington Moore Press.
Bassey, M. (1999) Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Open University Press.
Carr,W, Kemmis, S. (1993) Action Research in Education. In: Hammesley, M, Controversies in Classroom Research, Buckingham; Open University Press
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education. London; Routledge Falmer
Dadds, M. (2001) Doing Practitioner Research Differently. Routledge; London and New York
Elliott, J. (1991) Action Research for Educational Change, London: Open University Press.
Farren, M. (2005) Creating a pedagogy of the unique through a web of betweenness. Education-Line. http://leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/149806.htm
Ghaye, A. (1998). Teaching and Learning through Critical Reflective Practice. David Fulton Publishers.
Hamilton, M. L. (Editor): (1998). Reconceptualising Teaching Practice. Falmer Press.
Loughran, J. (1996). Developing Reflective Practice: Learning about Teaching and Learning through Modelling. Falmer Press.
McNiff, J. (2000). Action Research in Ireland. Rougledge.
McNiff, J. (1995) Action Research for Educational Development, London; Hyde
McNiff, J. (1988) Action Research, Principles and Practice, London; Macmillan Education Ltd.
Maykut, P, Morehouse, P. (1994) Beginning Qualitative Research A Philosophical and Practical Guide . London; Falmer
Schön, D. (1995). ‘Knowing-in-action: The New Scholarship requires a New Epistemology, Change, November/December, 1995. pp. 27-34.
Stringer, E. (1999). Action Research, Sage Publications; 2nd edition
Winter. R.(1989). Learning from Experience. RoutledgeFalmer
Whitehead, J, (1989) Creating a Living Educational Theory From Questions of the Kind, How do I Improve my Practice? [online]. Available from: http:/www.bath.ac.uk/~edsajw/writing/livtheory.html
Whitehead, J. (1998) Educational Action Researchers Creating Their Own Living Educational Theories. A paper for presentation to the Action Research SIG, AERA, San Diego.
Zubber-Skerritt, O. (1998). Developing as researchers (co-edited with Linda Conrad. Brisbane: Griffith Institute for Higher Education
Zubber-Skerritt, O. (1996). New directions in action research. London: Falmer Press.
Zubber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action Research in Higher Education. London: Kogan Press.
Action research resources