1 / 24

EFB106 Success with assessment two

EFB106 Success with assessment two. Using a literature review to support your case study/project analysis Lee Holloway (lee.holloway@qut.edu.au) QBS Teaching and Learning team. This segment of the class will cover :.

goble
Download Presentation

EFB106 Success with assessment two

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EFB106 Success with assessment two Using a literature review to support your case study/project analysis Lee Holloway (lee.holloway@qut.edu.au) QBS Teaching and Learning team

  2. This segment of the class will cover: • The literature review component of your case study- this is also relevant for assessment 3 • Approaches to analysing and synthesising ideas • Approaches to writing a literature review • Team work • Your questions and where to go for further assistance.

  3. The Abstract • http://www.uts.edu.au/current-students/support/helps/self-help-resources/academic-writing/abstract-and-executive-summary • Essentially: • Text about a text • Short , half a page in this context • Each sentence introduces new information about each section of the report – so no paragraphs • Objectives, scope of analysis, methodologies, major findings • Write it last - in objective third person language • A panorama shot of your report/essay/review/brief

  4. Your literature review – key points • 200 words for the summary/abstract • 2500 words long (as per task instructions) • Refer to the five listed references and your own wider reading (academic journals) • Link the ideas in the papers together, do not discuss one paper at a time, compare and contrast, argue • Provide evidence/examples for the extent of the problem/issue to back up your statements

  5. The Case/Project You have been given a current issue to discuss a possible change in policy • Use economic theories to demonstrate gains and losses, costs and benefits for all relevant stakeholders. Provide a critical analysis of the possible methods that can be used to measure monetary values (4 questions) • 35% - Individual work • Due week 11

  6. What are you being marked on? • Excellent use of appropriate models, concepts and data to support analysis. Analysis is coherent and thorough and provides a balanced perspective, covering all advantages and disadvantages (15) • Excellent description of methods and applications under different scenarios. Demonstrated detailed understanding of the broad methodologies used, drawing on broad selection of appropriate sources (10) • Communicate body of analysis clearly and professionally, using language appropriate to the task (10)

  7. What is a literature review? • A critical review of the research that has already been done on a topic (what do we already know about the issue?) • Examine what’s already been done by grouping papers together, don’t just use the first relevant paper, identify issues, compare and contrast • The focus lies with exploring ideas rather than solutions • An analysis of the literature to frame the issue(s) and your response to it

  8. More tips for this assessment • Each question has a particular focus, address it • Use the literature to show your understanding of this emergent issue • Evaluate the articles do not just describe them • Critically discuss, don’t only summarize. (Evaluate concepts, theories, methodologies.)

  9. Transitions in your writing: Use linking words and phrases, so your writing: • sticks together well i.e. is cohesive (think of ‘adhesive’) • flows logically - guiding readers from one idea to the next. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=owl+purdue+and+writing+transitions&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&channel=fflb&gfe_rd=cr&ei=f69yU9DXN8nC8gfXyIG4CA NOTE: Linking words also called transition signals The links you choose depend on your purpose.

  10. Referring to literature

  11. Example of structured paragraph Source: RMIT study skills website: http://www.dlsweb.rmit.edu.au/lsu/content/2_AssessmentTasks/assess_tuts/lit_review_LL/writing.html

  12. Useful Links • http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/write/litreview.jsp • https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/literature-review-tutorial • Especially this page BELOW on how to write a well structured paragraph, integrating your sources and providing your analysis • https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/writing • Write like a researcher • http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/ • Cohesion and coherence • https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/574/02/ • More of the same • http://www.uts.edu.au/current-students/support/helps/self-help-resources/academic-writing/literature-review-writing

  13. Success with Assessment THREE • Analytical Report on a specific social Cost Benefit Analysis drawing on relevant literature and world issues • 2500 words • 40% • Team work with individual component • Central exam period

  14. Group vs Team • What does it mean to you? • The good... • The bad... • The ugly...

  15. Sweet success (acknowledgement UWA- smart study 4) • Individual commitment to the team is a key factor in making teams work • Each team is different so be prepared to make changes to suit the needs and goals of your team

  16. Getting started • Establish your ground rules (coming up) • Discuss your strengths and weaknesses • Discuss your individual goals (are you chasing a 4 or a 7?) • Decide how you will keep in touch outside the class (Adapted from Steve Marsden, QUT)

  17. The black and white • All members should contribute equally – delegate specific areas of the project equally • Allocate tasks and make sure deadlines are met (everybody has 168 hours a week) • Commit to being an ‘active’ member not a ‘spectator’ • One person speaks at a time in discussions, the others listen then comment • Begin your meetings on time • End your meetings on time (unless you all agree to extend) • Let everyone know if you can’t attend or haven't done your part • Distribute your work to all group members at all times (Adapted from Steve Marsden, QUT)

  18. Review others work • Review the work that other people have done critically (Is it reliable, reputable, relevant?) • That means you are assessing the how/what/why/where/who – just like your marker will • Check all work before it is handed in - everyone gets the same mark (don’t make one person responsible for this) • In your professional practice your work will be checked by others ( Adapted from Steve Marsden, QUT)

  19. Communicate • You require high level professional communication skills (now more than ever) • Teamwork is most effective when you communicate well with each other • Most importantly have a good attitude • Remember you have a common goal but you may all be extremely different people (Adapted from Steve Marsden, QUT)

  20. Make it work- in summary (acknowledgement UWA-smart study 4)

  21. Conflict resolution • What does conflict mean to you?

  22. Conflict- the good and the bad • At university everyone has the same status so problems can occur as members try to manage each other • Conflict can be both productive and destructive but disagreement about ideas is natural • It is important to see the difference between constructive and destructive tension (Adapted from Learning and Teaching, University of Sydney, 2006)

  23. Conflict example semester one (another unit) • Group of three students • Two full-time students -one working full-time so they met after hours to work together on the project • When it got to midnight the full-time worker left the meeting • When the peer assessment was completed the two students seriously marked down the third member for lack of commitment and involvement in the project • The third member was very upset and went to the academic • What do you advise in this situation - and generally in terms of conflict resolution?

  24. Consultations with Lee Holloway –Learning Advisor EFN Support for learning: • Explaining task directions in plain English • Structuring your assessment items • Supporting your views with evidence • Communicating professionally • Understanding academic honesty and plagiarism lee.holloway@qut.edu.au

More Related