1 / 8

Evaluation of the Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course - August 2013

This report presents the mean scores from the Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course held in August 2013, summarized through bar charts. A total of 62 candidates participated over three days. Feedback highlights strengths such as diverse question range, effective use of resources, and well-constructed presentations. However, suggestions for improvement include addressing occasional presentation issues, providing more pre-course materials, and scheduling adjustments to better manage topic intensity throughout the day.

gitano
Download Presentation

Evaluation of the Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course - August 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course Evaluation August 2013

  2. Mean score represented on bar charts 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar charts Total candidates = 62

  3. 19th Aug 2013, Day 1

  4. 20th Aug 2013, Day 2

  5. 21st Aug 2013, Day 3

  6. Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course evaluation

  7. Comments – good bits • Resources • SAQ club • Good range of questions • SBA Practice • Application of turning point technology to SBA’s • Opportunity to sit full 12 SAQ in exam conditions • Excellent volume of MCQ/SBA’s in 3 days • Highlighting important guidelines and studies • Well constructed presentations. The faculty had obviously put a lot of effort into the presentations • Lots of questions covered, good to be able to do some “new” SAQ’s which are likely to come up, overall very good – thank you!

  8. Comments – How could we make it better? • Occasional presentation glitches, some lecturers use of turning points too slow • Keep to time to include breaks and end time • More pre course material • Certain relevant guidelines in advance would be useful • It wasn’t good to have very intense neuro SAQ session followed by regional/pain at the end of the 2nd day – two very heavy topics were difficult to stay focused at that time of day

More Related