The Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

1. The Federal AccountingStandards Advisory Board Comprehensive Long-Term Fiscal Projections for the U.S. Government Eileen W. Parlow Assistant Director April 20, 2009

2. Disclaimer: Views expressed are the views of the speaker. Official positions of the FASAB are determined only after extensive due process and deliberations.

3. Why am I here today?

4. Fiscal Sustainability Reporting • FASAB’s Exposure Draft • International Perspective: Current IPSASB project

11. What just happened?

12. Will you remember this story? Yes!

13. Next question:Who spoiled Halloween?

14. Successful Communication • Is Easy to Remember • Changes behavior

15. “Sticky” ideas are easy to remember Made to Stickby Chip Heath and Dan Heath • Simplicity • Unexpectedness- surprise element • Concreteness • Credibility • Emotions • tells a Story

16. FASAB’s Challenge To communicate to “financial statement readers” (in particular, the general public and public intermediaries) vitally important information about the federal government’s fiscal sustainability in a way that is • Understandable • Meaningful • Technically robust

17. Background:Federal Financial Statements • U.S. Government’s fiscal year ends September 30 • Individual agencies issue audited financial statements • Treasury issues an audited financial statement for the federal government as a whole: “Financial Report of the U.S. Government”

18. Challenges • Technical challenges • Data is very complex • Data involves uncertainty • Projections require assumptions • Communication challenges • How to simplify complex information • How to hold the reader’s attention

19. Fiscal Sustainability Task Force • Technical experts • Chief Actuaries for Social Security and Medicare • Representatives from several “think tanks” • Subject-matter experts from GAO,OMB, CBO and Treasury • Communications experts • Academics in Communication and Public Policy • Executives of public advocacy groups • Two members of Congress

20. Technical Challenges • Assumptions • Time Horizon for Projections • Per Capita amounts

21. Technical Challenges • Type of data: • present-value dollars? • % GDP? • How to address uncertainty • How to set boundaries (what to include)

22. What’s the objective? Objective: Federal financial reporting should provide information that helps the readers to determine whether future budgetary resources will likely be sufficient to sustain public services and to meet obligations as they come due. [SFFAC 1. par.139]

23. Technical Challenges: Assumptions • Demographic assumptions • Economic assumptions • Policy assumptions

24. Technical Challenges: Policy Assumptions • What is “current policy”? • Current law = current policy? • Challenging aspects of current law • Statutory limit on Treasury debt • Short term of most discretionary legislation • Limitations on social insurance programs (earmarked receipts plus trust funds)

25. Technical Challenges: Time Horizon for Projections • Infinite horizon- pros and cons • Finite horizon- pros and cons

26. Technical Challenges Per Capita Amounts • Pros and cons • Board proposal

27. Technical Challenges Dollars versus Ratios • Dollars- pros and cons • Ratios- pros and cons

28. Technical Challenges: Proposed new financial statement PV Dollars % GDP (in trillions) Receipts Medicare Social Security All Other Receipts Total Receipts Spending Medicare Medicaid Social Security Rest of Federal government Total Spending Spending in Excess of Receipts

29. Technical Challenges: Proposed new financial statement Simplified bottom line: • Spending in Excess of Receipts Other alternatives: • Fiscal imbalance • Fiscal gap

30. Technical Challenges: Uncertainty How can we communicate uncertainty without confusing readers?

31. Technical Challenges: Uncertainty Federal Spending for Medicare and Medicaid as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product Under Different Assumptions About Excess Cost Growth

32. Technical Challenges: What to include How about something to Illustrate changing demographics?

33. Technical Challenges: What to include

34. What are the primary cost drivers?Perhaps not what you expect! Sources of Growth in Projected Federal Spending on Medicare and Medicaid

35. Projected Federal Deficits

36. Federal Debt Held by the Public

37. Impact of Delaying Action

38. Technical Challenges: What to include Foreign Holdings of U.S. Treasury Debt Original staff proposal had two displays: • List of top foreign government holders of Treasury debt, plus • Chart showing the change

39. Technical Challenges: What to include Foreign Holdings of U.S. Government Debt by Major Investing Country As of June 30, 2006 Billions of Dollars Japan 719 China, mainland 619 Luxembourg 90 Middle East Oil-Exporters** 78 United Kingdom 75 Cayman Islands 57 Belgium 56 Switzerland 43 Netherlands 35 Canada 22 Total 1,794

40. Technical Challenges: What to include Foreign Ownership of U.S. Treasury Debt Has Increased Foreign and International Investors Federal Reserve, domestic investors, state and local governments

41. Technical Challenges: What to include The proposed requirements do not include: • Policy proposals • “Inter-generational equity” (See Treasury’s “Issue Brief No. 3: Social Security Reform: Benchmarks for Assessing Fairness and Benefit Adequacy”)

42. Inter-generational Equity

43. Outreach FASAB outreach for this ED: • FASAB mailing list • Press contact list • IPA contacts • Over 300 think tanks • Public advocacy /government watchdog groups • Presentation at various professional events • Public hearing held on February 25, 2009

44. Public Comments Received • 22 Comment Letters • 7 speakers addressed the Board at the February 25th Public Hearing

45. Public Comments on the Draft • Innovative items- graphics and FAQs- were helpful for readers • Most supported finite-horizon, not infinite-horizon data • Most support reporting foreign holdings

46. Public Comments • It’s almost - but not quite - too late to send comments. • Board meets this week: April 22 and 23 to try to finalize draft Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) • The exposure draft and the 22 letters received are posted on the FASAB website at www.fasab.gov

47. International Accounting Standards The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) • is an independent standard-setting body designated by, and operating under the auspices of, the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). • has begun a project with similar objectives titled: Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability

48. International Accounting Standards: IPSASB • IPSASB meets less frequently than FASAB - only 4x year • IPSASB does not expect to issue a standard for several years • IPSASB has formed an international task force for this project

49. International Accounting StandardsIPSASB Project • “Project Brief” issued March 2008- comments were due in July 2008 • IPSASB agenda item March 2009 in Paris • Next meeting will be May 18-21, 2009 in Washington, DC – public may attend but need to RSVP

50. International Accounting StandardsIPSASB Project • Papers are available at: http://www.ifac.org/PublicSector/Projects.php • Papers for the May 2009 meeting will be available at: http://www.ifac.org/PublicSector/Meetings.php