1 / 49

Martin Valcke Martin.Valcke@UGent.be UTWente - May 2011

Evidence-based teaching and learning: acknowledge the impact of critical processes and variables that affect teaching and learning . Martin Valcke Martin.Valcke@UGent.be UTWente - May 2011. Conclusions. “What works in education?” is a too simple question.

geraldlyons
Download Presentation

Martin Valcke Martin.Valcke@UGent.be UTWente - May 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evidence-based teaching and learning: acknowledge the impact of critical processes and variables that affect teaching and learning Martin Valcke Martin.Valcke@UGent.be UTWente - May 2011

  2. Conclusions • “What works in education?” is a too simple question. • Priority question: do we check our own quality? • Are we focused on self-monitoring of educational quality? • The “teacher as a researcher”.

  3. How will we work during this session? • x

  4. How will we work during this session? • What has the highestpositive impact onlearning of pupils? • Diet • Sleepinglonger • Watchingtelevision • Reducinganxiety • Whosays 1 ? Raiseyour hand • Whosays 2 ? Raiseyour hand …

  5. What works in education? • What has an impact on learning performance? • Direct impact • Indirect impact (motivatie, attitudes, self-concept, self-efficacy, …). http://www.sigo.be/sok/Kwaliteit%20in%20onderwijs.pdf

  6. Direct impact Higher performance Specific process, characteristic, … Attitude Self-concept Motivation Beliefs Perceptions …. • Indirect impact

  7. Specific process, characteristic, … • Examples • Home work • Mind maps • Giving feedback • Computer based instruction • Collaborative versus individual learning

  8. Mindmap

  9. Specific process, characteristic, … • Instructional process highest impact? • Home work • Mind maps • Giving feedback • Computer based instruction • Collaborative versus individual learning % % % % %

  10. Effect size • Effect didactical strategy, process, aanpak …. • Many studies: meta-analysis of these studies • Summary of effects: calculation effect size (d). • Rule of thumb: from d = >.40 the effect is interesting. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analysis relating to Achievement. Milton Park, Oxon: Routledge.

  11. Specific process, characteristic, … • Instructional process highest impact? • Home work • Mind maps • Giving feedback • Computer based instruction • Collaborative versus individual learning d=.29 d=.57 d=.73 d=.37 d=.59

  12. Maar … even complexer maken • Akkoord met onderzoeken? • Bijv. Huiswerk

  13. http://www.hisparks.com/MathHelpers/Homework_Research_and_Policy.pdfhttp://www.hisparks.com/MathHelpers/Homework_Research_and_Policy.pdf

  14. Making things more complex Higher performance Specific process, characteristics, … Attitudes Selfconcept Motivation Beliefs …. Characteristics learner Characteristicsteacher

  15. Making things more complex

  16. Micro-, meso- and macro level

  17. Making things more complex • Learner characteristics • Teacher characteristics • School characteristics • Instructional context

  18. Learnercharacteristics • Gender • Prior knowledge • Start at pre school level • Reduceanxiety • Diet

  19. Learner characteristics • Gender(d=.12) • Prior knowledge(d=.67) • Start at preschool level (d=.45) • Reduceanxiety(d=.40) • Diet (d=.12)

  20. Teacher characteristics (gebaseerd op Hattie, 2009, p. 109)

  21. Teacher characteristics • Expectations teacher • Relationship teacher-learner • Develop subject knowledge • Teacher training • Professional development teacher (gebaseerd op Hattie, 2009, p. 109)

  22. Teacher characteristics • Expectations teacher (d=.43) • Relationship teacher – learner (d=.72) • Develop domain knowledge (d=.09) • Teacher training (d=.11) • Professional development teacher (d=.62) (gebaseerd op Hattie, 2009, p. 109)

  23. Teacher instructional approaches • Didacticalappraoches • Objectives • Content • Media • Strategies • Evaluatiion

  24. From class to school level

  25. School characteristics

  26. School characteristics

  27. School characteristics • Summer holiday • Class size • Retention • School size • Learning in small groups

  28. School characteristics • Summer holiday (d=-.09) • Class size (d=.21) • Retention (d=-.16) • School size (d=.43) • Learning in small groups (d=.49)

  29. School in context

  30. School in context

  31. Who wants educational research? • Teachers • Ministers • School leaders • Educational developers • Editors • Researchers • …

  32. Who carries out research? • Researcher = away from practice • Teacher = away from research • Teacher as a researcher … • Chooses the research problem? • Selects alternative solutions? • Helps to interpret the results?

  33. Teacher as researcher

  34. Teacher as researcher

  35. Conclusions • “What works in education?” is a too simple question. • Priority question: do we check our own quality? • Are we focused on self-monitoring of educational quality? • The teacher as a researcher.

  36. Evidence-based teaching and learning: acknowledge the impact of critical processes and variables that affect teaching and learning Martin Valcke Martin.Valcke@UGent.be UTWente - May 2011

More Related