180 likes | 278 Views
This summary presents data on air quality factors such as PAHs, Benzo(a)Pyrene, Sulphur Dioxide, Sulphate, N-Alkanes, and Indoor Particulates in various locations like Bearspaw, Priddis, Kananaskis, Calgary, and Houston. The study highlights the impact of SO2 pollution on Bearspaw and Priddis, examining factors like isotopes, histochemical analysis, and visual damage. Recommendations and legal issues related to sour gas emissions are also discussed, emphasizing public education and improved industry interaction.
E N D
Summary of Air Quality PresentationsbyENSC 502Class of 2000-2001
PAHs Benzo(a)Pyrene
Average values (g/m3) Sulphur Dioxide Sulphate Bearspaw 5.81 0.99 Priddis (Non- Flaring) 0.74 0.38 Priddis (Flaring) 1.83 0.52 Kananaskis 0.097 0.047 Calgary 1.3 - Houston 2.47 - Alberta Environment Ambient Air Quality (annual) 30 - SO2 and SO42- Concentrations
Vegetation • Both Priddis and Bearspaw are significantly affected by SO2 pollution relative to the control as determined by Si/So ratios • Bearspaw is the most affected by sour gas emissions according to isotope data • Priddis is more affected by environmental stresses as indicated by histochemical analysis and visual damage
Precipitation • Rural sites had higher deposition of sulphate. • Nitrate does not vary with the degree of urbanisation. • Sulphate at Carsland primarily derived from industrial emissions. • Sulphate flux greatest in SE Calgary.
N-Alkanes • No significant difference between flaring and non flaring events may indicate that: • particulate n-alkanes transform into more complex molecules • Or particulate n-alkanes were fully combusted in the flare
Perceived Health Effects • In general, Priddis residents show a greater concern and take more action towards the sour gas issue • Significant correlation - Priddis & Bearspaw: level of concern level of importance - Bearspaw: level of concern perceived health impacts
LEGAL ISSUESReport of the Provincial Advisory Committee Advisory Committee • Representative cross section of affected interest groups • Critical in approach • Outlines a plan of implementation • EUB compliance critical Recommendations • Restructuring of the hearing process • Improved industry and public interaction • Better enforcement and more audits • Public education on sour gas issues
Acknowledgements • We would like to thank the following people and organisations: • Butterfield Acres, Rothney Astronomical Observatory, K. McDonald, K. Foster, • Van Ho, Matt Tammam, John Tong, G. Kerlukes, T. Lambert, A. Lucas, S. Roth, and the ENSC faculty and staff.