Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Paraprofessional Overview of Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative (CALI). Iris White Associate Education Consultant Connecticut State Department of Education 860-713-6564 [email protected] Norms for Professional Meetings. Courtesy toward others and presenter
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Associate Education Consultant
Connecticut State Department of Education
Sec. 2008. Not later than December 1, 2008, the department shall report and make recommendations to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to education concerning professional development for paraprofessionals and the status and future of school paraprofessionals with instructional responsibilities.
Public Act 08-169 An Act Concerning the Teaching of Children with Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities.
The Commissioners of Education, Higher Education and Developmental Services and the President of Southern Connecticut State University shall define autism and developmental disabilities and develop recommendations for a comprehensive statewide plan to incorporate methods of teaching children with autism and other developmental disabilities into training provided to school paraprofessionals pursuant to section 10-155j of the 2008 supplement to the general statutes, related service professionals, early childhood certificate holders, administrators and parents.
Connecticut adopted a modified version of the NRCP model framework to articulate key competencies for Connecticut paraprofessionals
National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals Model (1999)
Connecticut Guidelines for Training and Supervision of Paraprofessionals, pp. 28-36
2. Assisting teachers/providers with maintaining learner-centered supportive environments.
3. Supporting teachers/providers with planning and organizing learning experiences.
4. Assisting teachers/providers with engaging students in learning and assisting in instruction.
5. Assisting teachers/providers with assessing learner needs, progress and achievement.
6. Meeting standards of professional or ethical conduct.
for each of these responsibilities (the model describes the scope).
The model defines six primary areas of responsibilities for paraprofessionals:
1. Assist professionals with building and maintaining effective instructional teams.
2. Assist professionals with maintaining learner-centered supportive environments.
3. Support professionals with planning and organizing learning experiences.
4. Assist professionals with engaging students in learning.
5. Assist professionals in instruction.
6. Assist professionals with assessing learner needs, progress and achievement.
An employee who assists teachers and/or other professional educators or therapists in the delivery of instructional and related services to students. The paraprofessional works under the direct supervision of the teacher or other certified or licensed professional. The ultimate responsibility for the design, implementation and evaluation of instructional programs, including assessment of student progress, is a collaborative effort of certified and licensed staff.
(-Connecticut Guidelines for the Training and Support of Paraprofessionals, page 7).
Requires anyone who is not certified be under the direct supervision of state certified personnel. This means that all paraprofessionals must not provide initial instruction to students and must be under the direct supervision of certified personnel when carrying at their responsibilities.
Teachers are responsible for the following:
Developing lesson plans to meet curriculum requirements and education objectives for all learners.
Adapting lessons, instructional methods, and curricula to meet the learning needs of individual students
Developing behavior management and disciplinary plans
Adapted from Strengthening and Supporting Teacher and Para educator Teams: Guidelines for Paraeducator Roles, Supervision, and Preparation by A.L. Pickett, 1999, New York: National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals in Education, Center for Advanced Study in Education, Graduate Center, City University of New York.
Provide regular feedback regarding paraprofessional’s work performance, support paraprofessionals in providing instruction to students, and provide support and direction to paraprofessionals who work in independent capacities.
1. Participation in regularly scheduled meetings and sharing relevant information.
2. Implementation of proactive behavior and learning strategies.
3. Use of strategies that provide learner independence and positive self-esteem.
4. Assistance in accommodating and modifying learning strategies based on learning styles, ability levels and other individual differences.
5. Review and reinforcement of learning activities.
6. Assistance in engaging learners through an awareness of cognitive, physical, social, emotional and language development.
7. Use of developmentally and age-appropriate reinforcement and other learning activities.
8. Collection of data on learner activity.
9. Carry out functional (informal) assessment activities.
10. Participation in continuing professional development.
(-Connecticut Guidelines for the Training and Support of Paraprofessionals, pg. 68)
(-Connecticut Guidelines for Training and Support of Paraprofessionals, pg. 58.)
(-Connecticut Guidelines for the Training and Support of Paraprofessionals, pg. 42).
FOR ALL EDUCATORS:
Interventions (SRBI, also known as
Response to Intervention)
FOR COACHES AND LEADERS:
“Until you have data as a backup, you’re just another person with an opinion.”
Dr. Perry Gluckman
*Developed by The Leadership and Learning Center
(S. White, Beyond the Numbers, 2005, p. 18)
D. B. Reeves, Accountability for Learning: How Teachers
and School Leaders Can Take Charge, 2004, p. 71
“Schools with the greatest improvements in student achievement consistently used common assessments.”
D.B. Reeves, Accountability In Action, 2004
D.B. Reeves, CEO,
The Leadership and Learning Center
*Developed by CSDE & RESC/SERC Alliance
Conflict resolution and peer mediation are not appropriate as means of addressing bullying
Weakfish: Bullying Through the Eyes of a Child by Michael Dorn, p. 62
Safe Havens International, Inc.
The role of adults as moral agents and exemplars:
Students want and need adults to be:
Who Are the Adults?
“The reflective process is at the very heart of accountability. It is through reflection that we distinguish between the popularity of teaching techniques and their effectiveness. The question is not ‘Did I like it?,’ but rather ‘Was it effective?’”
(Reeves, D. B., Accountability for Learning, 2004, p. 52)
Student Causes Teacher Causes
Source: Leadership for Learning, 2005, Center for Performance Assessment, www.MakingStandardsWork.com
CSDE, Bureau of School and District Improvement
www.ct.gov/sde (Click “Teachers and Administrators”, Click “School Improvement/Accountability for Learning Initiative” and under most popular links)