Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
VET vs general education in macedonia:Education policy perspective “VET for social inclusion in the Western Balkans andTurkey: towards Regional Actions”, Torino, 12-13 December 2011 Prepared by: Prof. SuzanaBornarova PhD Institute for Social Work and Social Policy Faculty of Philosophy, Skopje, Macedonia
VET system • Delivered through 173 VET programmes within 110 USS and 6 higher vocational schools (2 public; 4 private; 6 semesters) • VET available for 30 occupations • Qualifications: - I-st level: training for jobs with lower requirements (up to 2 years) - II-nd level: vocational training for occupation (3 years) - III-rd level: technical education (4 years) - IV-th level: postsecondary education and training
Pupils/students in upper-secondary and higher vocational education Source: State Statistical Office
General vs vocational education programmes in upper-secondary schools
Pupils in general and vocational secondary schools per gender 2009/2010
Effective educational practices • Programmes overburdened with theory: - II-nd level qualifications: The general education takes up 50% of the three year vocational education, the vocational theory 30% and the practical training 20% • III-rd level qualifications: general education takes up 45% technical education, the vocational theory 35%, the practical training 10 % and elective instructions 10% (final+matura exam). • Low level of provision of work place training opportunities by businesses and firms
Effective educational practices • Inclusiveness or segregation: • Heterogeneous per: gender, socio-economic status, rural/urban, ability • Homogeneous : in some cases per ethnicity • Family/community involvement: parental meetings/school boards/individual contacts; disengagement of parents; no impact on decision-making in school; no involvement in curriculum development or evaluation; no internet/phone communcation; no involvement of community members nor community education • Academic expectations (of students, teachers, families): low aspirations; no individualised help to stimmulate academic endeavors
Effective educational practices • VET teaching: insufficient teacher training (traditional teaching methods, authoritarian relations with students/families); human resources; technical/financial resources; ex-catedra instead of interactive approach; low student participation • Strategies used by VET schools to reduce school failure and increase social cohesion in school neighbourhood and communities are nearly non-existent • Cooperative learning (no peer-mentors/peer learning groups) • Democratic values in curriculum: citizen’s education instead of cross-culturalism; multiculturalism • Diversity consideration: gender stereotyping
VET status • Reserved for students with lower educational achievements • Attracts minority students • Less strict entry criteria and study requirements (high pass rates) • Stigmatisation (VET for poor/GE for elite/well-off) • Related to lower socio-economic status of students
VET vs General education: Educational policy perspective • Education as ALTERNATIVE to social protection: Higher investments in education lower investments in social protection and vice versa! • Education as INSTRUMENT for prevention of social exclusion