1 / 28

NSF Research Opportunities For Social Scientists

NSF Research Opportunities For Social Scientists. Harold Clarke Ashbel Smith Professor University of Texas at Dallas and University of Essex Former NSF Division Director, Social and Economic Sciences. Independent Agency Supports basic research Natural & Social Sciences

gavan
Download Presentation

NSF Research Opportunities For Social Scientists

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NSF Research OpportunitiesFor Social Scientists Harold Clarke Ashbel Smith Professor University of Texas at Dallas and University of Essex Former NSF Division Director, Social and Economic Sciences

  2. Independent Agency Supports basic research Natural & Social Sciences Uses grant mechanism Discipline-based structure Cross-disciplinary mechanisms Mix of Permanent & Visiting Staff NSF in a Nutshell

  3. Why You Might Want NSF Funding • Funds basic research • Funds both theory development & data collection • Funds infrastructure development – everything from submarines to software • Provides summer salary support • Funds doctoral dissertation research • Program Development Opportunities

  4. Office of the Director Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Social and Economic Sciences Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences Science Resources Statistics

  5. Opportunities • Unsolicited competitions • Special initiatives (e.g., Democratization) • Rapid response research (RAPID) • Early concept grants for exploratory research (EAGER) • CAREER grants • Doctoral dissertation improvement grants

  6. Social and Economic Sciences FY09 Program Allocations (~millions of dollars) • Cross-Directorate Activities $3.8 • Decision, Risk, & Management Sciences $7.5 • Economics $25.8 • Innovation and Organizational Sciences $3.4 • Law and Social Science $5.1 • Methodology, Measurement & Statistics $4.0 • Political Science $9.9 • Science and Society $8.9 • Sociology $9.5 Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

  7. Where to Start? • www.nsf.gov • Check awards by program, keyword, etc. www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/ • Read solicitation carefully (if not unsolicited competition) • Download Grant Proposal Guide • Contact Program Officer once you have formed and organized your ideas

  8. SES Target Dates January 15 & August 15 Law and Social Science Political Science Sociology January 16 & August 16 Methodology, Measurement, and Statistics January 18 & August 18 Decision, Risk, & Management Sciences Economics February 1 & August 1 Science and Society February 2 & September 3 Innovation and Organizational Sciences

  9. Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program • Untenured faculty (or comparable) • Single scholar award • $400,000, 5-years minimum award • Three proposals lifetime limit • July 1 deadline • High expectations

  10. Rapid Response Research (RAPID) • Research when data are ephemeral, e.g. study impact of stimulus package • $200,000 maximum; 1 year • 5 page project description • Internal review only • Contact program officer first

  11. Early Concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) • Exploratory work on untested, potentially transformative ideas • High-risk, high-potential payoff • $300,000 maximum; 2 years • Eight page description • Internal review only • Contact program officer first

  12. Dear Colleague Letter Example: Integrating HSD Goals into Core SBE Programs • Complexity Science • Large-scale Interdisciplinary Research • Infrastructure

  13. NSF Proposal Generating Document Minimum of 3 Reviews Required Organization submits via FastLane Program Officer Analysis & Recom- mendation Ad hoc Division Director Concur Panel Both Research & Education Communities Proposal Process Returned as Inappropriate/Withdrawn Award via DGA Proposal Processing Unit NSF Program Officer Decline Organization Proposal received by NSF Div. Dir. Concur Award 4 months 30 days DGA Review & Processing of Award Proposal Preparation Time Review of Proposal P.O. Recommend

  14. Finding Reviewers • Program Officer’s knowledge • References listed in the proposal • Google & online data bases • Reviewer’s recommendations • Investigator’s suggestions

  15. Human Subjects • No award for a project involving human subjects can be made without prior Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval of the research activity. • IRB approval is not needed at the time of proposal submission.

  16. Funding Decision Process • Program Officer decision • Feedback to PI • If Your Proposal is Recommended… • Scope of Work & Budget Discussions • Division Director Concur (typically yes) • Formal notification of Recommendation

  17. Two Funding Criteria • Intellectual merit • Broader impacts • Both are Important – intellectual merit is necessary but not sufficient

  18. Intellectual Merit • NSF funds basic research • NSF funds basic research • Intellectual merit means increasing knowledge through developing and testing theories, gathering data relevant to theory testing, developing methods relevant to theory testing • Leading-edge science

  19. Broader Impacts • Promote teaching, training and learning • Broaden participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geography) • Enhance infrastructure for research and education, e.g., facilities, instrumentation • Disseminate results broadly to bolster scientific and technological understanding • Benefit society

  20. Budget Tips • Amounts • Reasonable for work – Realistic – Don’t be greedy! • Well Justified -- Need established (Do You Really Need 9 Trips to Paris?) • In-line with program guidelines • Eligible costs • Personnel • Equipment • Travel • Other Direct Costs, Subawards • Facilities & Administrative Costs

  21. Some Urban Legends about the NSF • Only funds scholars at elite graduate institutions • Only funds “famous” academics • Once declined, you are likely always to be declined • Only funds “normal science” • Only funds American topics • Panels make funding decisions

  22. Reasons for Declinations • “Trust-me” proposal (I’m a bright person!) • Expertise gaps • Too Expensive (Program budgets are small!) • Incremental contribution • Competition, Competition…. • Bad luck • Unhappy with Decision? You are not alone!

  23. NSF and the ARRA (Stimulus Package) • NSF - Total Stimulus Package ~$3 billion • SES - Total Stimulus Package ~$41 million • Very closely monitored (priorities - CAREERS, 1st time investigators, review very well) • ARRA ONE-SHOT! • Back to regular business in 2010

  24. How SES Spent the ARRA$ • SES initially given $27 million • Clarke-Scioli Experiment - 8 + 1 shares (DD strategic reserve) • Can Small Programs Do More 1st Rate Science? • Yes! • Additional Competitions as $ became available • e.g., Political Science - $4.5 million

  25. Advice • Study Important Topics • Study Interesting Topics (Don't be boring!) • Team up with smart people • Team up with creative people • Being interdisciplinary helps • Critically review your own proposal – before you hit the ‘send’ button!

  26. Questions?

  27. National Science Foundation Director Deputy Director National Science Board Inspector General Staff Offices Computer & Information Science & Engineering Mathematics & Physical Sciences Biological Sciences Engineering Geosciences Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Budget, Finance & Award Management Information Resource Management Education & Human Resources

  28. Restrictions, Monitoring • In-House Proposals From Fall 2008 & Spring 2009 Rounds • Priorities -> • CAREERS • First-Time Investigators • RAPIDS & EAGERS • Dissertations • Closely Monitored

More Related