1 / 73

Management of Difficult Airway in Anesthesia Part I

Management of Difficult Airway in Anesthesia Part I. Chan Wei-Hung MD Department of Anesthesiology National Taiwan University Hospital. Difficult Airway in Anesthesia Practice. Inability to maintain airways explains more than 30% of death in anesthesia.

garry
Download Presentation

Management of Difficult Airway in Anesthesia Part I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Management of Difficult Airway in AnesthesiaPart I Chan Wei-Hung MD Department of Anesthesiology National Taiwan University Hospital

  2. Difficult Airway in Anesthesia Practice • Inability to maintain airways explains more than 30% of death in anesthesia. • More than 85% in respiratory-related malpractice would lead to severe brain damage or death.

  3. Difficult Airway • Anticipated • Unanticipated • How to evaluate the difficult airway? • Evaluation for Difficult Intubation • Evaluation for Difficult Mask Ventilation

  4. Evaluation for Difficult Intubation • Mallampati test • Thyromental distance • Mouth opening • C-spine mobility • Dentition • Difficult recognition of cricothyroid membrane

  5. Mallampati Test Class I Class II Class III Class IV

  6. How to Do Mallampati Test • Patient remains seated. • Ask the patient to open the mouth as widely as possible and protrude tongue as far out as possible. • Phonation should not be encouraged. • Perform the test twice to avoid bias.

  7. Validity of the Test (I) Cormack Grade of Laryngoscopic View

  8. Validity of the Test (II) Mallampati class Total 210 patients

  9. Difficult Mask Ventilation • Facial deformity (congenital, acquired) • Geriatric patients with depressed cheeks • Patients with a nasogastric tube • Extremely fat patients • Patients with head fixation devices • Patients with long mustache • High risk of aspiration • Patients with orofacial burn • Patients with extremely limited mouth opening—Difficulty in inserting an oropharyngeal airway

  10. Infection Trauma C-spine injury Obesity DM Acromegaly Foreign body Ankylosing spondylitis Rheumatoid arthritis Tumors Congenital syndromes Pregnancy Pathological Conditions Associated with Difficult Airway

  11. The ENT Cases • Always check the chart for visibility of vocal cord. • In case of airway tumors/abscess, search for CT/MRI images for the position and the width of the airway.

  12. Rheumatoid Arthritis • TMJ ankylosis, limitation of motion of the cervical spine, deviation of the larynx,cricoarytenoid arthritis • Laryngeal involvement--edematous, hyperemic cords, arytenoid mucosa with swollen aryepiglottic folds and false cords • A smaller ET tube may be necessary.

  13. DM & Difficult Airway (I) • Severe diabetes mellitus can result in abnormal cross-linkage of collagen by non-enzymatic glycosylation in connective tissues due to chronic hyperglycemia. • These tissues then become stiff and may result in limited joint mobility (stiff joint syndrome). • “Prayer sign”

  14. DM & Difficult Airway (II) • 32% of 115 diabetic patients who underwent renal and/or pancreatic transplant had a difficult laryngoscopy • Difficult laryngoscopy in 31% of 62 diabetic patients undergoing renal transplantation or vitrectomy. • Of 725 transplant patients, diabetic vs non-diabetic = 4.8 vs 1.0% were identified as having difficult laryngoscopies, but no extraordinary devices were required for intubation. Anesth Analg 1988;67:1162-5 Anaesthesia 1990;45:1024-7 • Anesthesia & Analgesia. 86:516-9, 1998

  15. Palm Print as a Predictor of Difficult Airway in DM • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 42(2):199-203, 1998

  16. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 42(2):199-203, 1998

  17. Decision Making in Anticipated Difficult Airway (I) • All-or-none gambling  how could you take the risk? • The anesthesiologists always walk on a tightrope between becoming a hero or being bankrupted. • An outcome-based question • Personal experience and preference is supremely important and govern the outcome.

  18. Decision Making in Anticipated Difficult Airway (II) • The only universal rule and the No.1 guideline Do not ever try to use anything that you are not familiar with or any fancy equipment in such a situation! So be well-prepared for such a hard time!

  19. Annual Meeting of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) • Held in mid-October every year • There always be a workshop for airway management, which is deserved to attend during residency. • The 2002 Annual Meeting will be in Orlando, Florida on October 12-16, 2002. http://www.asahq.org/

  20. Decision Making in Anticipated Difficult Airway (III) No matter where you practice, something you must knowbefore you make decision: • What kind of equipment do you have at hand? • What is the quality of the equipment? • Do you have any assistant? (mask ventilation) • How much does your assistant know? • Do you have immediate access to the help from your fellow anesthesiologists? • What is the attitude of the surgeons?

  21. Decision Making in Anticipated Difficult Airway (IV) Anticipated Difficult Airway Difficult Mask Ventilation YES NO Awake Intubation Induction Procedures

  22. Succinylcholine: Friend or Foe? • Rapid onset, short duration – always welcomed. • Undeniable weak points: • Fatal hyperkalemia (burn, spinal cord injury) • Malignant hyperthermia • Masseter spasm • Atypical plasma cholinesterase

  23. SCC vs Vecuronium In 44 pediatric patients, the mouth opening by mm: Succinylcholine Vecuronium Mouth opening was measured by a constant force (1.4N). • Anesthesiology 69(1):11-6, 1988

  24. Mivacurium or Rocuronium: Destined to Be Ousted? • Low dose  slow onset • High dose  long duration For Rocuronium 1~1.2 mg/kg IV bolus Onset 45 sec Duration 30 min For Mivacurium 0.2~0.25 mg/kg IV bolus Onset 2 min Duration 5~15 min

  25. The Prolonged Duration of Rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) in Chinese Patients • Anesthesia & Analgesia 91(6):1526-30, 2000

  26. Mivacurium + Rocuronium • British Journal of Anaesthesia 79(4):450-5, 1997

  27. Preoxygenation: How Much Is Enough? Two techniques common in use: • Tidal volume breathing (TVB) of oxygen for 3–5 min • Deep breaths (DB) 4 times within 0.5 min Both are equally effective in increasing arterial oxygen tension (Pao2). Anesth Analg 1981; 60: 313–5

  28. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1337-1341

  29. After preoxygenation to an end-tidal oxygen concentration greater than 90%, each subject received 5 mg/kg thiopental and 1 mg/kg succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 2001, 95: 754-759 Succinylcholine itself cannot save your account. (Esp. when you did not do good preoxygenation.)

  30. Who is at the risk of premature desaturation? • Obesity • Parturient • Neonate • Decreased FRC

  31. Other Weak Points of Pentothal + SCC • Copious secretion after awaking the patient, hampering subsequent fiberoscope. • It is said that with this technique a period of inadequate ventilation would happen during recovery. “Pentothal + SCC then take a look” is generally a good idea, but it does not guarantee anything!

  32. All the Toys You Know How to Play No 1 rule: Do not stick to the same one too long. No 2 rule: Always be doing something.

  33. Equipment Ready to Use • Direct laryngoscope • Think more about the laryngoscopy: • Patient position • Smaller ET tube size • Different blades • Make good use of the stylet • External laryngeal pressure • If you can visualize epiglottis and make sure the midline position, you can give it a try; otherwise give it up immediately.

  34. External Laryngeal Pressure

  35. Other Techniques • Light wand • Laryngeal mask airway • Combitube • Wu’s scope • Cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) • Awake the patient

  36. Endpoint of All Techniques • Can’t intubate, can’t ventilate…… • Establish airway through cricothyroid membrane immediately Easier said than done. Not every cricithyroid membrane is easily recognized. (Especially on your first time, perhaps the last time, too) Try to define it on a fat man with a short neck. Remember to hyperextend the neck.

  37. Cricothyroid Membrane Puncture • You won’t need to do so for too many times in life. • However, you must know how to do it.

  38. On Hand Technique • Use big-bore cath-over-needle (14# or 16#) • Attach syringe at the end of the cath, keep gentle negative pressure • Puncture caudally until air is withdraw from the syringe • Advance needle a little bit with extreme care (much like the way in vascular access) • Hold the needle and advance the cath • Remove needle, attach syringe to the hub of the cath, aspirate air to ascertain its correct position.

  39. Three Ways to Go • Transtracheal jet ventilation (TTJV) • Connect to a traditional ventilator • Commercial cricothyrotomy kit

  40. Transtracheal Jet Ventilation • This can be delivered directly through the cath or (if you have the time) insert a single-lumen CVP catheter by Seldinger technique. • Drawbacks: • Not always available • High risk of complication (barotrauma) • Angiocath is prone to kinking • Problem shooting: attach a syringe and aspirate air to test (kinking, subcutaneous penetration); auscultation

  41. Transtracheal Jet Ventilation • Because of drastic outcome with its complication, you must be very alert all the time when using TTJV. (Complication may occur even when you think ”I’m safe now”.) • So when TTJV is working well, don’t just go away; try some other thing like fiberoptic intubation / call ENT doctor for tracheostomy immediately!!

  42. Settings of TTJV • Driving pressure : 50 psi (20-50 have been proposed as acceptable) • I:E ratio = 1:1~3 • Rate: 10~20/min • Higher frequency (100~600/min) is for those who have compromised pulmonary function (improving oxygenation along with less barotrauma compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation).

  43. Recovery from TTJV • Bucking and glottic closure during TTJV may increase the risk of barotrauma, esp. when short-duration agent (like SCC) is used. • Monitoring EMG at forearm is not practical (laryngeal and diaphragmatic muscles are more resistant to muscle relaxants.); airway pressure tracing was proposed for monitoring. • Pay heed to patient’s movement; oral suction regularly while hold TTJV momentarily.

  44. Pros and Cons of TTJV • Simpler, quicker, less training required compared with ciricothyrotomy • With poor patency of upper airway, gas exhalation can be hindered and lung hyper-expansion ensues  increased risk for barotrauma Insert an artificial airway when using TTJV. Decrease the I/E ratio (longer expiration). Use in long procedures is not favored.

  45. Connect to a Traditional Ventilator • Unorthodox method: not generally accepted, better than nothing • Connect the hub of the cath to the ventilator via a 3 mm ET tube adaptor. • Connect the hub of the cath to a 5-ml syringe then insert a 7.0 mm ET tube inside, inflate the cuff, then connect to the ventilator. • Connect the hub of the cath to a 3-ml syringe then insert an adaptor form a 7.5 mm ET tube inside, then connect to the ventilator

  46. Connect to a Traditional Ventilator • Higher respiratory pressure required (mimic TTJV). use O2 flush button. • Self-inflated reservoir bag can be used as well.

More Related