1 / 11

Argunaut’s 1 st teachers’ workshop

Argunaut’s 1 st teachers’ workshop. An example of a design workshop in the initial stages of tool development. The Digalo discussion tool. Graphical, synchronous e-discussion Ontology of shapes and connectors Small groups of 3-6 discussants Moderated / un-moderated.

garran
Download Presentation

Argunaut’s 1 st teachers’ workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Argunaut’s 1st teachers’ workshop An example of a design workshop in the initial stages of tool development

  2. The Digalo discussion tool • Graphical, synchronous e-discussion • Ontology of shapes and connectors • Small groups of 3-6 discussants • Moderated / un-moderated

  3. The Idea of Argunaut

  4. Planning the workshop… • The “Hen and Egg” problem • Solution strategy: using mock-ups • Initial awareness indicators selected based on: • Literature review • Pedagogical experience • Mock-up visualizations: • Static vs. animated vs. interactive • Familiar vs. unique/innovative • Amount of data in one graph?

  5. Brief description of the workshop • Questions: What awareness data are needed for effective online moderation of e-discussions? How should these data be presented to the moderator? • Participants: 12 teachers with Digalo classroom experience. • Schedule: • Introduction to the ideas of Argunaut. • Visualization workshop (mock-ups->feedback). • “Free” annotation/evaluation of Digalo maps • Data sources: questionnaires, group discussion, observation sheets

  6. A taste of the visualization workshop… For each of the following displays, please note: • How important/useful is the type information displayed, for moderating Digalo discussions online? • How intuitive/easy to understand was the display of information? (Also Likert scale) • Any comments?

  7. Activity1

  8. Activity2

  9. Social network - simplified

  10. Social network - full

  11. Sample feedback & reflection • Activity 1 > Activity2 • SNA-simple > SNA-full • “Information should be added, like coloring the arrows from one to the others in colors of support/opposition.” (SNA-simple) • “I prefer the user's name to automatically appear inside the circle, the shapes are too abstracted for me.” (SNA-simple) • Information overload, too many shapes. Not suitable for real-time (=on-the-fly) work, requires too much time to process/analyze. (SNA-full) • There are a lot of things you have to know in order to interpret the information. (SNA-full)

More Related