1 / 21

Draw the line

Draw the line. An Approach to an Alternative Way of Architectural drawing. Soranart Sinuraibhan The University of Sheffield September 2002. Architect. Drawing. Non-architect. What it is about?. Problems raised:

Download Presentation

Draw the line

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Draw the line An Approach to an Alternative Way of Architectural drawing Soranart Sinuraibhan The University of Sheffield September 2002

  2. Architect Drawing Non-architect What it is about? Problems raised: Design drawings have undergone many changes and refinement brought about by various method. With the continuous developments of new mediation and technique, design drawings multiplied in number and in the quantity of information they contain. Architectural codes inside drawing become internalised and play out as private language that excludes non-architect.So the communication between architect and non-architect is currently a problematic issue. Aim: To investigate an alternative method of architectural drawing which could bridge the apparent gap in communication between architect and non-architect.

  3. How can I answer the Problems? Communication theory An analysis based on a communication model and map onto architectural context. Historical approaches Trace the development of architectural design drawing and identifies the innate characteristic of it. Analyse through the discussion of communication situation. Empirical tests Two phases of empirical tests are conducted in order to examine relationship between architectural drawing and non-architect. The test will illustrate the perceived failure of communication process in architectural drawing. As the result, the outcome from the first test will use as a basis principle in order to develop the system of alternative method in architectural drawing and will employ as a model for the second phase.

  4. Communication theory model: Sender Message Channel Receiver ‘Channel’ Seeing ‘Encoder’ Hearing ‘Communication source’ ‘Receiver’ ‘Message’ Touching Smelling ‘Decoder’ Decode and response Tasting How architect communicatesto non-architect? Communication model:(Berlo, 1960: p.30)

  5. ‘Architect’ who employs codes into the drawing ‘Architectural code’ ‘Architectural idea’ ‘Architectural drawing’ ‘Architectural drawing’ ‘Non-architect’ ‘Seeing’ ‘Reading’ ‘Listening’ Response How architect communicatesto non-architect? Communication model in architecture: Based on Berlo’s model

  6. Jacobson’s Communication Model(Jakobson, 1958: p. 353) Context Message AddresserAddressee Contact Code • The matter of personal characteristic • Of Architect and Non-architect • 1] Communication skill • 2] Attitude • 3] Knowledge Level • 4] Position with in a social or professional system

  7. The failure of communication Why is happen? Why is begin?

  8. Why a communication has failed? between architect and non-architect through architectural drawing Communication skill(Codification and Decodification) Architect: Encoding skill Non-architect Decoding skill

  9. Attitude Attitude toward Self: It will be reflected in the drawing. Attitude toward Subject matter: Architect should know the information he conveys in his drawing. Attitude toward Addressee: The most important in communication situation between architect and non-architect.

  10. Communication model in Ancient Egypt Hieroglyphic and Symbolic language Architect Drawing Viewer Designed object Hieroglyphic and Egyptian culture and codes as a decoder Direct link from architect to the designed object Knowledge level: Related to Communication skill Architect: Architectural knowledge Encoding skill Non-architect:No architectural language Decoding skill Individual background

  11. Social and professional status Architects from different position of professional status communicate and encode message differently. Non-architects from different social classes or background view and decode drawing differently.

  12. Addresser Architect Message - Context A set of graphic code Channel - Contact Message is put through the channel of drawing as contact Addressee Non-architect Communication skill Encoding skill Communication skill Decoding skill Content Seeing Treatment Hearing Attitudes Receiver is affected by architect ‘s attitude. But receiver’s attitude, subject matter, and knowledge may concern Attitudes Architect’s attitude, subject matter, and non-architect. Element Touching Structure Smelling Knowledge Knowledge level, Educational level and The culture of architect. Code Knowledge Receiver has no architectural knowledge. It may need support from architect’s encoder in order to get a decoder. Tasting Social and professional position Architect from different culture or experience communicates and encodes differently. Social System and Cultural disposition Non-architect from different social classes or culture decode differently. The Fidelity of CommunicationBased on Berlo, 1960

  13. Empirical test Phase one

  14. 1 2 3 1- Plan A: Coded language. 2- Plan B: Pictorial language. 3- Plan C: Three dimensions. Drawings

  15. Data Frequency table: Gender of participant Frequency table: Faculty of participant

  16. Part 1 Question 2: Which provides the clearest information about the relationship between rooms? Question 3: Which most clearly shows how to move from one room to another?

  17. Part 2

  18. Question 31 Q. 31: What will make you understand architectural drawing better? • Have no difficulty understanding the drawing, clearly understand. • The combination of various techniques of drawing, such as plan A+B+C. • Three-dimensional drawing. • More context given and More details. • Furniture arrangement or incorporation of familiar things to appropriated scale. • Elevation and section. • Scale and measurement or Scale bar. • List of what symbols mean and clear labelling. • Different types of drawing (of the same space). • A drawing with a photograph. • Model or something easier to understand and visualise where drawings are simply easier to measure from. • Appropriated information within a drawing, too much information can overwhelm a person. • Direction of ‘North’ or orientation arrow. • No more artistic impressions • Superimpose a drawing into real picture • Colour, shading, and texture • Numerical dimensions

  19. Question 31 18 To show a view from eye level, since that is how most people look at rooms 19 Electronic versions enabling switching between views or use of colour. 20 Virtual reality or fly through animation. 21 Human figure for scale 22 Cartoon • Depend on what want to know. • Lager print • Ask an architect. • Do architectural degree. • Experience and training, to have more knowledge about drawing plans and symbols used.

  20. Postscript Hopefully the alternative method of architectural drawing from the study will be useful for: Architect: Increase his skill of encoding which will provide the fidelity of communication situation between his client and himself. Non-architect: Give non-architects an opportunity to understand architect drawing better. Bridge an apparent gap between them and architect which will leads to a better communicated. Education: Employ as a guidance for architectural student or teacher, to improve the way in which they convey the drawing to the public realm.

More Related