1 / 18

Disentangling dynamic and geometric distortions

Disentangling dynamic and geometric distortions. Federico Marulli Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna. Marulli, Bianchi, Branchini, Guzzo, Moscardini and Angulo 2012, arXiv:1203.1002 Bianchi, Guzzo, Branchini, Majerotto, de la Torre, Marulli, Moscardini and Angulo

galvin
Download Presentation

Disentangling dynamic and geometric distortions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Disentanglingdynamic and geometricdistortions Federico Marulli Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna • Marulli, Bianchi, Branchini, Guzzo, Moscardini and Angulo • 2012, arXiv:1203.1002 Bianchi, Guzzo, Branchini, Majerotto, de la Torre, Marulli, Moscardini and Angulo 2012, arXiv:1203.1545

  2. Bologna cosmology/clusteringgroup Carmelita Carbone: Victor Vera (PhD): Fernanda Petracca (PhD): Carlo Giocoli: • Roberto Gilli: • Michele Moresco: Lauro Moscardini: Andrea Cimatti: Federico Marulli: N-body with DE and neutrinos + forecasts BAO with new statistics DE and neutrino constraints from ξ(rp,π) HOD and HAM (Halo Abundance Matching) AGN clustering P(k) clustering of galaxy clusters galaxy/AGN evolution RSD + Alcock-Paczynski test + clustering of galaxies/AGN

  3. Redshift space distortions How to constract a 3D map Ra, Dec, Redshift  comoving coordinates • the real comoving distance is: the observed galaxy redshift: zc : cosmological redshift due to the Hubble flow v||: component of the galaxy peculiar velocity parallel to the line-of-sight Geometric distortions Dynamic distortions Observational distortions

  4. Dynamic and geometric distortions The two-point correlation function geometric distortions geometric distortions no distortions dynamic+geometric distortions dynamic+geometric distortions dynamic distortions

  5. Modelling the dynamical distortions The “dispersion” model non-linear model linear model model parameters

  6. Statistical errors on the growth rate δβ/β density bias Bianchi et al. 2012

  7. Effect of redshift errors on β and σ12 Dynamic distortions + δz Only dynamic distortions Dynamic distortions + δz δz  small sistematic error on β δβ ~ 5% for all δz

  8. Effect of geometric distortions Error on the bias Error on β Spurious scale dependence in b(r) Error on ξ(s)/ξ(r) GD  δβ is negligible

  9. The Alcock-Paczynski test Steps of the method • Choose a cosmological model to convert redshifts into comoving coordinates • Measure ξ • Model onlythe dynamical distortions • Go back to 1. using a different test cosmology

  10. …next future 10 N-bodysimulationswith massive neutrinos (L=2 Gpc/h) (1e6 CPU hours at CINECA) for: • all-sky mockgalaxycatalogues via HOD and box-stacking • all-skyshearmaps via box-stacking and ray-tracing • all-sky CMB weak-lensingmaps • end-to-endsimulationsfor BAO and RSD statistics • referenceskiesfor future galaxy/shear/CMB-lensingprobes • ISW/Rees-Sciamaimplementation/analysis PI Carmelita Carbone

  11. Conclusions • systematic error on β of up to 10%, for small bias objects • small systematic errors for haloes with more than ~1e13 Msun • scaling formula for the relative error on β as a function of survey parameters • the impact of redshift errors on RSD is similar to that of small-scale velocity dispersion • large redshift errors (σv >1000km/s) introduce a systematic error on β, that can be accounted for by modelling f(v) with a gaussian form • the impact of GD is negligible on the estimate of β • GD introduce a spurious scale dependence in the bias • AP test  joint constraints on β and ΩM

  12. Mockhalocatalogues BASICC simulation by Raul Angulo GADGET-2 code • ~1448^3 DM particles with mass 5.49e10 Msun/h • periodic box of 1340Mpc/h on a side • ΛCDM “concordance” cosmological framework (Ωm=0.25, Ωb=0.045, ΩΛ=0.75, h=0.73, n=1, σ8=0.9) • DM haloes: FOF M>1e12 Msun/h • Z=1

  13. Systematic errors on the growth rate ~10%

  14. Errors on β on different mass ranges • Small masses [M<5e12 Msun/h]  systematic error on β ~ 10% • Intermediate masses [5e12<M<2e13 Msun/h]  systematic error is small  the linear model works accurately • Large masses [M>2e13 Msun/h]  large random errors

  15. Statistical errors vs Volume

  16. Effect of redshift errors on β and σ12

  17. Effect of geometric distortions 1D correlation function deprojected correlation

  18. Effect of redshift errors on 1D ξ

More Related