1 / 6

Relating Levels of Funding to Performance

Relating Levels of Funding to Performance. Dr. Richard Beck Director, Planning and Performance Management. Expectations under Budget and Performance Integration. Performance is a factor in planning:

gage-bauer
Download Presentation

Relating Levels of Funding to Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Relating Levels of Funding to Performance Dr. Richard Beck Director, Planning and Performance Management

  2. Expectations under Budget and Performance Integration • Performance is a factor in planning: • performance (actual and planned) is considered when determining the funding levels requested in the budget • the performance resulting from the application of funding can be estimated and then tracked • A per unit-produced funding estimate can be calculated to describe the value of achieving a result which can be used to • estimate the potential result of adding/subtracting an increment of funding • indicate possible increases or decreases in efficiency when tracked over time • The increment of funding needed to produce an incremental change in the level of a performance measure target can be estimated to within +/- 10%

  3. Benefits of Budget and Performance Integration • This approach can be useful for developing a broader understanding of the size and range of investments needed to conduct certain types of government programs relative to expectations • it is not meant to replace the need for detailed project or unit specific funding estimates and rationale • Calibrate or place the funding estimates for individual projects in a broader “policy” context • provide an alternate perspective by which to judge the validity of the amount of funding requested • Provides a range of funding around an “median” that can help develop a better understanding as to: • why the amount of funding requested is appropriate for a project, unit, or activity • the factors that drive two similar-looking projects or activities to require different levels of funding (e.g. different costs associated with different local factors or different aspects of the effort – for wildland fire manual vs mechanical)

  4. End Outcome Goal (measure targets specify what is expected to be achieved by the end of the CY) End Outcome Measure Targets for BY+ ? Budget Estimates for BY (defines what funding is needed in BY) ABC/M Data for CY (updated quarterly) Budget Request for BY Includes: Funding Estimates for BY & End Outcome Measure Targets for BY & Implications for End Outcome Measure Targets > BY Start of CY (BY now becomes current CY) CY = current fiscal year BY = budget year

  5. Quarterly Review Format

  6. Example: Potential Indicators of Cost Per Unit of Performance

More Related