1 / 34

# Lecture 1(c) Marginal Analysis and Optimization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lecture 1(c) Marginal Analysis and Optimization. Why is it important to understand the mathematics of optimization in order to understand microeconomics?. The “economic way of thinking” assumes that individuals behave as if they are “rational”.

Related searches for Lecture 1(c) Marginal Analysis and Optimization

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Lecture 1(c) Marginal Analysis and Optimization' - gaerwn

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Lecture 1(c) Marginal Analysis and Optimization

Why is it important to understand the mathematics of optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• The “economic way of thinking” assumes that individuals behave as if they are “rational”.

• Question for the class: What does it mean to say that behavior is “rational”?

Any Optimization problem has three elements. optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• What do you you want? That is, what is your Objective:

• To become Master of the Universe (and still have a life)

• Control Variables:

• Hours studying economics (since econ is the key to happiness and wisdom)

• Constraints:

• Time, energy, tolerance of mind-numbing tedium

The magic word: “marginal” optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• MARGINAL ____ : The change in ____ when something else changes.

• Approximate Formula: The marginal contribution of x to y=(change in y)/(change in x)

• Exact Formally (calculus): If y=f(x), the marginal contribution of x to y is dy/dx.

Example: The Benefits Studying optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Benefits and Costs optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Interesting Observation optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• Marginal Benefits decrease and marginal benefits increase.

• Questions for the class

• Is this sensible?

• Is there a certain similarity between costs and benefits?

Net Benefits optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Net Benefits optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

3 hours is the best

Think About Optimization as a Sequence of Steps optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

If Here, Do More

If Here, Do Less

Common Sense Conclusion optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• If marginal benefits are greater than marginal costs, then do more.

• If marginal benefits are less than marginal costs, then do less.

• To optimize, find the level of activity where marginal benefits with marginal costs

Applying the Principle to Equibase optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• Our spreadsheets let us work with any number of different assumptions about demand and costs, and so let’s assume that Equibase merged with the tracks

• Objective: max profits

• Constraints are defined by the market demand and the costs. Let’s assume

• Q=500(5-P)

• Variable Production cost = \$.5/unit

• Fixed production cost = \$500

Distinguishing costs and benefits for the firm optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• Selling programs generates revenue, the “benefit” of the activity.

• Note R = PxQ (a very pure definition)

• MR = Change in R when Q changes

• More formally (change in R)/(change in Q)

Benefits of Selling Programs optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Costs are incurred in production and Sales optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Optimal Decision Making In the Firm: A Simple Example optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Explicitly describe the three elements of the optimization problem

• Goal: Profit Maximization

• Decision Variables: Price or Quantity

• Constraints:

• On Costs: It takes stuff to make stuff and stuff isn’t free.)

• On Revenues: Nobody will pay you an infinite amount for your stuff.

Revenue Constraints: Obvious (but useful) Definitions optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• Total Revenue (TR): PxQ, nothing more-nothing less (and not to be confused with profit, net revenue, etc.)

• Marginal Revenue (MR): The change in total revenue when output changes

• Approximated as: Change in TR/ Change in Q

• Calculus: dTR/dQ)

Example optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Putting it together optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

Why Is the Optimal Q=1,125 optimization in order to understand microeconomics?

• For all Q less than this, MR<MC, meaning an increase in output would raise revenue by more than costs.

• For all Q greater than this MR<MC, meaning an increase in output would raise revenue by less than the increase in costs.

• This is such an important conclusion, it should be stated formally as Necessary Condition for Profit Maximization: If you produce, produce the Q such that MR=MC.

Thinking about optimization this way helps understand two important (related) principles

• Fixed Costs Don’t matter (at least to the optimal solution)

• Anything the “unnaturally” distorts marginal costs leads to a reduction in the optimal amount that can be achieved

Assume Fixed Costs are \$5000 important (related) principles

Why Doesn’t the Change in Fixed Costs Change the Way the Firm Operates?

• Because there is change MR or MC

• But what if by shutting down (Q=0) fixed costs can be eliminated?

Anything that “unnaturally” distorts marginal costs leads to a reduction in the optimal amount that can be achieved

• Remember we saw that charging a per unit fee reduced the combined profits. Now we know why.

• The tracks had control of the retail price and hence the sales volume.

• The per unit fee was reflected in the sales price, but it didn’t represent a “real” cost. It appeared real enough to the tracks but it didn’t represent any actual expenditure, it was just a transfer from one division to the other. Thus it caused the tracks to raise the price of the programs beyond the optimal amount.

• In other words, the tracks were led to believe that there was a variable cost (beyond the printing costs)

• Can you think of other examples where firms make this mistake?

Everything you ever needed to know about calculus to solve optimization problems in economics

• Consider the simple function

y=6x-x2

• If we calculate the value of y for various values of x, we get

The graph of the function would look like this optimization problems in economics

As you can see both from the table and the graph, if x=3, y is at its maximum value.

How Calculus Helps optimization problems in economics

• But drawing a graph or computing a table of numbers is tedious and unreliable. One of the many good things about calculus is that it gives us a convenient way of finding the value of X that leads to the maximum (or minimum) value of Y.

• The key to the whole exercise is the fact that when a function reaches it’s maximum value, the slope of the graph changes from positive to negative. (Confirm this on the graph given above.)

• Thus, we can find the critical value of X by finding the point where the slope of the graph is zero (remember, if the graph is continuous, the slope can’t go from positive to negative without passing through zero).

• Now- and here’s where the calculus comes in—the optimization problems in economicsderivative of a function is nothing more than a very precise measurement of the slope of the graph of the function.

• Thus, if we can find the value of X at which the derivative of the function is zero, we will have identified the optimal value of the function.

• If this were a math class, we’d spend several lectures studying exactly what is meant by a derivative of a function and we’d end up with some rules for finding a derivative.

• But since this isn’t a math class, we’ll go straight to the rules (especially since we only need a few of them and they’re very easy to remember.)

Rules for finding derivatives optimization problems in economics

• The derivative of a constant is zero.

• If Y=C for all X, then dY/dX=0

• (Which makes sense, since the graph of Y=C is a flat line and thus has a slope of zero).

• The derivative of a linear function is the coefficient (the thing multiplied by the variable)

• If Y=bX, then dY/dX=b

• (Which makes sense, since the slope of this function is just the coefficient.)

Rules for finding derivatives optimization problems in economics

• The rule for a “power function” is as follows

If Y=bXn, then dY/dX=nbXn-1

• For example, if Y=3x2, then dY/dX = 6X

• Notice, by the way, the rule for linear functions can be viewed as a special case of the power function rule—since x0=1.

• Notice also that the power function rule is good for evaluating functions involving quotients. For example the function

Y = 2/X

can be written as

Y=2X-1

and so the derivative is

dY/dX=-2X-2=-2/X2

Rules for finding derivatives optimization problems in economics

• The derivative of a function that is the sum of several functions is the sum of the derivatives of those functions

• If Y=f(x)+g(x),

then

dY/dX=df(x)/dx+dg(x)/dx

• By combining these rules we can find the derivative of any polynomial.

• If Y=a + bx + cx2+…+dxn,

• then

• dY/dX=b+2cX+…+ndXn-1

Formal Analysis (Calculus) optimization problems in economics

• Let X stand for the number of hours studying

• Benefits = 12X-X2

• Marginal benefit = 12 - 2X

• Cost = X2

• Marginal Cost = 2X

• Setting marginal benefit = marginal cost implies 12-2X=2X or X=3