200 likes | 413 Views
John Musson (and Colleagues!) TJNAF. Ultra-Linear Receivers for Digital LLRF Control Systems. Receiver Parameters. Intrinsic Noise Figure Low-end limit Ultimate sensitivity Saturation Large-signal limitations, distortion Linearity Everything in-between!. External Phase Noise
E N D
John Musson (and Colleagues!) TJNAF Ultra-Linear Receiversfor Digital LLRF Control Systems
Receiver Parameters Intrinsic Noise Figure Low-end limit Ultimate sensitivity Saturation Large-signal limitations, distortion Linearity Everything in-between! External Phase Noise ADC Sampler Jitter Interference ”blocking” Reciprocal mixing Additionally, AM demod is inherently linear PM is NOT! Threshold effect
Taxonomy IIP3 = Input 3rd Order Intercept Point P1dB = 1 dB Compression Point K = Boltzmann's Constant To = 290 degrees Kelvin NF = Noise Factor (linear) F = Noise Figure (in dB) SFDR = Spurious-Free Dynamic Range BW = Receiver Bandwidth MDS = Minimum Discernible Signal SNR = Signal to Noise Ratio
All Math Aside....or a Toolbox Smorgasbord To = 290 K (IEEE) KTo = -174 dBm NF = Tsys /290 + 1 F = 10 log NF IIP3 = Pim = 3Ptone – 2PIIP3 NFnet = SFDR3 = 2/3 (IIP3 + 174 – F -10log BW) SFDR2 = ½ (IIP2 + 174 – F -10 log BW) Pphase noise = Punwanted + 10log BW + Prx phase noise
Courtesy “RF and Microwave Designer's Handbook, Watkins-Johnson Company, 1997 “Introduction to Radio Frequency Design,” Wes Hayward, ARRL 1994
Receiver Bandwidth Software Defined Radios (SDRs) can have 2 associated bandwidths: Analog Minimum element in Front End Factors include latency, anti-alias, IF / Digital Generally the narrowest, set by IIR / FIR DR Calculations should use the analog BW SNR should use narrow/digital BW In addition, Closed-Loop control BW for LLRF BW determined largely by sensitivity (KTB) and latency (“Group Delay”) requirements Ex. JLAB LLRF Rx uses a 8 MHz BPF exhibiting 100 ns of latency
Components High IIP3 FET Mixer WJ HMJ5 IIP3 = 35 dBm Try to shield active (vulnerable) amplifier, but not deep enough to destroy noise figure! High IIP2 / IIP3 Amplifier WJ AHJ-2 IIP3 = +26 dBm F = + 4dB HMJ5 AHJ2 Strategy: 3 6 3 BPF BPF Thermopad +17 dBm LO
Don't Forget the ADC!! Effective Dynamic Range = -1.25 + 6.02b + 10log fs b = # of bits, fs = sample frequency 1 Hz BW DR > Analog, and LSB >> MDS Noise Figure can be assigned Function of sample rate and # of bits F = 12 dB (AD 6645 w/ fs = 56 MHz, Rs = 200 Ohms) S/N degradation from sample clock jitter: Sets ultimate PM limit Sets ultimate PM S/N Setsultimate PM limit • Reference: Frerking, M., “Digital Signal Processing in Communication Systems”
Courtesy “Digital Signal Processing in Communication Systems,” Frerking, M., Chapman and Hall,1994 • “Digital Communications,” Proakis, J., McGraw-Hill, 1994
Grouping Relevant Terms..... Pmin ~ KToB + Fnet + S/Njitter + Pphase noise + S/Nimposed - ??? (ie Processing Gain from DSP decimation??) JLAB LLRF (Gradient) IF = 70 MHz, fs = 56 MHz, B = 10000 (control BW) -134 + 35 + (<90 dBc for < 200 ps) + ? + 80 -20 = -39 dBm!! So, our receiver is within spec at Pin > -39 dBm.
What About High-End? FET mixer (IIP3 = +35 dBm) combined with CATV amplifier (IIP3 = +27 dBm), predicts an IIP3 of + 43 dBm (+41 dBm measured) Maintaining an IM supression of 80 dB implies: Pmax = 2* 43 – 80 = + 3 dBm. So, based on the additional requirement of 20 dB of specification compliance, we achieve +3 - (-39) = 42 dB of dynamic range (100 : 1) with 80 dB of supression on either side. Arguably, high-end range can also be extended by noting that IM corruption is correlated….Would most likely lead to a “DC” phase offset” Presumption of some processing gain bails us out!!!
Verification Measurements Noise Figure Y-Factor Effective for F < 25 dB Affordable; easily built into receiver front ends Spectrum Analyzer + LNA Nice paper presented by T. Powers at BIW '98 “Improvement of the Noise Figure of the CEBAF Switched Electrode Electronics BPM System” MDS / Tangential Sensitivity Easy to do; outcome-based! Can also be built-in Dynamic Range 1 dB Compression IIP3 Phase Noise
“Fundamentals of RF and Microwave Noise Figure Measurements,” HP Tech Note 57-1 “Noise Figure Measurement Accuracy- The Y- Factor Method,” HP Tech Note 57-2 “Radio Astronomy,” J. Kraus, Cygnus-Quasar, 1988
Two-Tone IMD Test for IIP3 Courtesy “Improve Two Tone, Third Order Testing,” Mini Circuits Tech Note
Courtesy “Introduction to Radio Frequency Design,” W. Hayward, ARRL, 1994
Phase Noise Or........
Summary • Life for the Analog RF Engineer is STILL interesting! • Back-to-basics design and testing • Made much easier with modern ($$) test equipment • Models are quite reliable for first-cuts • Narrowband techniques can improve most parameters (ala Genesys) • If LLRF becomes more demanding…….(?) • 73, DE WD8MQN