1 / 65

Spatio-Temporal Models for Mental Processes from fMRI

Spatio-Temporal Models for Mental Processes from fMRI. Raghu Machiraju Firdaus Janoos , Fellow, Harvard Medical Istavan ( Pisti ) Morocz , Instuctor , Harvard Medical. Premise.

gaenor
Download Presentation

Spatio-Temporal Models for Mental Processes from fMRI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spatio-Temporal Models for Mental Processes from fMRI Raghu Machiraju FirdausJanoos, Fellow, Harvard Medical Istavan (Pisti) Morocz, Instuctor, Harvard Medical

  2. Premise Understanding the mind not only requires a comprehension of the workings of low–level neural networks but also demands a detailed map of the brain’s functional architecture and a description of the large–scale connections between populations of neurons and insights into how relations between these simpler networks give rise to higher–level thought

  3. Goals • Understanding the representation of mental processes in functional neuroimaging • Distributed interactions • Space and time ! • Comparing processes across subjects • Neurophysiologic interpretability

  4. Outline • fMRI Analysis • Representations • Spatio-temporal Models • Conclusion

  5. What Is fMRI ? • fMRI is a non-invasive tool for studying brain activity • Spatio-temporal data (4D) • Spatial resolution – mm • Temporal resolutions – secs • Functional specialization • Classical neuroscience • Functional integration • Functional and effective

  6. The fMRI Signal • The BOLD Effect • Measure of cerebral metabolism • Task related • Default-state networks • Confounds/Nuisance • Random – thermal + quantum mechanical • Structured component • Distortions, physiological, motion, reconstruction

  7. The BOLD Effect Measure of “oxygenated blood” in the brain • Volume of deoxyhemoglobin • T2* weighted EPI sequences • The exact coupling between neuronal activity and the BOLD signal unknown • Linked primarily to metabolic activity at synapses • Depends on rCBF, rBVO2, rCMRO2 • The hemodynamic response function is highly variable

  8. fMRI Noise • Acquisition • Reconstruction • Magnetic field • Inhomogeneities • Instability • Physiologic functions • Aliased onto signal • Head motion • Correlated with the task • Registration / Correction

  9. Classical Pipeline

  10. fMRI Analysis • Functional Localization • Static Activity Maps • GLM, PCA, ICA, PLS, • Functional Integration • Functional Connectivity • CCA, ICA, PCA, DBN • Effective Connectivity • SEM, DCM, DBN

  11. Typical DCM

  12. Benefits • fMRI provides information about the activity of large neural assemblies • Static pictures of the foci of activity and the interconnections • Mental processes arise from dynamic relationships between the neural substrates • Spatially distributed, temporally transient and occur at multiple scales of space and time. • Time resolved analysis • Ordering of information processing

  13. Cascadic Recruitment

  14. State-of-the-Art Janoos et al., EuroVis2009

  15. Need Decoding ! • VOXEL-wise Representations Limited • Dynamic Processes • Distributed Representations Needed • Beyond functional localization • Where vs. how • Distributed activity and functional interactions • Pattern Classifiers • Atoms of Thought for Cracking Neural Code 

  16. Haxby, 2001

  17. Mitchell, 2008

  18. Challenges • Very controlled experiments with copious training • General results have not always been positive • Applications to arbitrary settings ? • Temporal nature of mental processes • Neurophysiologic interpretability • Multi-subject analysis

  19. Inspiration Lehmann, 1994

  20. Preliminary Results visuo–spatial working memory

  21. 2 Patients

  22. Functional Networks

  23. Functional Connectivity Estimation

  24. Functional Distance Zt – activation patterns f - transportation

  25. Cost Metric

  26. Functional Distance t1 t2 t3

  27. Algorithm

  28. Mental Arithmetic • Involves basic manipulation of number and quantities • Magnitude based system – bilateral IPS • Verbal based system – left AG • Attentional system – ps Parietal Lobule • Other systems – SMA, primary visual cortex, liPFC, insula, etc

  29. Paradigm

  30. Clustering in Functional Space

  31. Spatial Maps 10 10 same as 8 9 8 8 auditory cortices 7 6 , judgment 6 5 5 Frontal, parietal lobes 4 3 3 visual size estimation 2 1 1 Visual Cortex 0 0s 4s 8s +5.0 -5.0 0

  32. Critique • No neurophysiologic model • Point estimates • Hemodynamic uncertainty • Temporal structure • Functional distance - an optimization problem • No metric structure • Expensive !

  33. Functional Distance

  34. Cost Metric

  35. Cost Metric Distortion minimizing

  36. Feature Space Φ Orthogonal Bases Graph Partitioning Normalized graph Laplacian of F

  37. Feature Space Φ

  38. Feature Selection

  39. State-Space Model Janoos et al., MICCAI 2010

  40. (Reduced) State-Space Model

  41. Model Size Selection • Typically strike a balance between model complexity and model fit • Information theoretic or Bayesian criteria • Notion of model complexity • Cross-validation • IID Assumption

  42. Maximally Predictive Criteria • Multiple spatio-temporal patterns in fMRI • Neurophysiological • task related vs. default networks • Extraneous • Breathing, pulsatile, scanner drift • Select a model that is maximally predictive with respect totask • Predictability of optimal state-sequence from stimulus, s

  43. Dyscalculia Difficulty in learning arithmetic that cannot be explained by mental retardation, inappropriate schooling, or poor social environment • Core conceptual deficit dealing with numbers • Very common : 3-6% of school-age children • Heterogeneous

  44. Paradigm

  45. Results Self – same subject Cross – train on one subject and predict on another

  46. Comparing Models Φ1 Subject 1 Φ2 Subject 2 . . . fMRI Data Φ42 Subject 42

  47. MDS Plot

  48. MDS Plot

  49. Drawbacks • Approximations in the model • Elimination of the activity pattern layer • Spatially unvarying hemodynamics • Unsupervised approach • No explicit link to the experiment • May not necessarily learn relevant patterns

  50. Semi-supervised Approach • Loose dependency between stimulus and signal • Not preclude discovery of un-modeled effects • Stabilize estimation • Generalizable to unconstrained designs • Functionally well-defined representation

More Related