1 / 6

T he criteria and process for the approval of new tasks

This draft proposal outlines the criteria and process for approving new tasks within the SAON Board. It incorporates inputs from previous meetings and workshops, ensuring quality control, data access, and data archival. The proposal also emphasizes compliance with international data systems and periodic review of network participants.

gabrielg
Download Presentation

T he criteria and process for the approval of new tasks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The criteria and process for the approval of new tasks Draft proposal Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October 2012, Potsdam ,

  2. Overview • Action from Board meeting in Tromsø: “Develop a document on the criteria and process for the approval of new tasks. Present the document for discussion at the next Board meeting.” • Input: ‘The SAON Brochure’ (2009) • Input: Minutes from the workshop of the Arctic Data Coordination Network, IPY 2012, Montréal, Quebéc, Canada 27 April 2012 (‘The Montreal Workshop’) • ‘The process for the approval of new tasks’: Pending governance structure

  3. ‘The SAON Brochure’ • The activity is currently functioning and not only a plan/idea. • There is a defined point of contact and a process for regular dissemination of information (web site and/or newsletter). • There is a public mechanism (preferably a web site) for obtaining information (metadata) about the observing activities and data. • Data quality control procedures are in place. • The principle of free and open data access is being followed to the maximum extent possible. • Plans are in place for both medium and long-term data archival at nationally and/or internationally-recognized data repositories

  4. From ‘The Montreal Workshop’ • There is an identified data resource person • The network or data centre must meet the requirements for World Data System certification(http://icsu-wds.org/wds-members/join-icsu-wds/criteria-membership-certification) • The network/data centre must adhere to the IPY data policy • The nation/data centre must use standard metadata that meets the needs of the discipline(s) • Must harmonize with relevant international data systems (domain not discipline) • In order for the SAON data network to be successful there must be periodic review of the participants in the network to ensure compliance and build capacity in interoperability and data brokering.

  5. Process for approval of new Tasks • Intersessional work • Secretariat drafts a response, focusing on the criteria • Response is reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee and/or the Board

  6. More information www.arcticobserving.org

More Related