1 / 6

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. By: Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph. Conceptual Framework. Praise and Blame Forward Looking (Teleological) Backward Looking (Deontological) Legal Responsibility and Moral Responsibility Individual Responsibility

Download Presentation

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MORAL RESPONSIBILITY By: Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph

  2. Conceptual Framework • Praise and Blame • Forward Looking (Teleological) • Backward Looking (Deontological) • Legal Responsibility and Moral Responsibility • Individual Responsibility • Collective Responsibility

  3. Individual Responsibility • Responsible Persons • Rationality • Free Will • Responsibility Limiting Conditions • Imperfect information • Imperfect Freedom • Personal Coercion (Threats and Enticements) • Circumstantial Coercion • Social Coercion • Biological Coercion

  4. Collective Responsibility • Groups as Voluntary Associations • Hierarchies • Leaders and Followers • Information Flow- • Coercive Power-delegation of responsibility • Responsibility Within Hierarchies • Information • Consent • Coercive Force- • Threats and Freedom to Exit • Shared Responsibility

  5. CASES • Jim Jones- • The People’s Temple Agricultural Project • Jonestown, Guyana • Mass Suicide: (Nov. 1978) 914 died: 638 adults and 276 children • Enron Scandal- Corporate Culture

  6. Federal Sentencing Guidelines 1991 • Assessing Legal Responsibility for Organizations • Individual Culpability • Corporate Culpability • Organizational Structure can Cause Criminal Activity • Diffusion of Responsibility in Organizations • Strengthen Internal Mechanisms to Prevent Criminal Activity by Agents and Employees • Theories: • Respondeat Superior Theory-any crime committed by an employee within an organization is the prganization’s responsibility. (even “rogue employees”) • Model Penal Code Theory-direct participation, authorization, or tolerance of high officials. • Corporate Character Theory-culpability based on corporate policies or customs cause agents or employees to violate the law on behalf of the corporation. • Participation of HIGH Managerial Officials • Prior History • Obstruction of Justice and Cooperation with Authorities • Program to Prevent and Detect Violations of Law

More Related