1 / 37

A View from the US Sao Paolo, Brazil August, 2006

B. A. S. C. I. A View from the US Sao Paolo, Brazil August, 2006. Jonathan Pershing, Rob Bradley Climate, Energy and Pollution Program World Resources Institute http://www.wri.org. Overview. Observed 20 th century climate change Emissions Impacts

frey
Download Presentation

A View from the US Sao Paolo, Brazil August, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B A S C I A View from the USSao Paolo, BrazilAugust, 2006 Jonathan Pershing, Rob Bradley Climate, Energy and Pollution ProgramWorld Resources Institute http://www.wri.org

  2. Overview • Observed 20th century climate change • Emissions • Impacts • Projections: future expectations for emissions • US Policy • Federal • State • Private

  3. Rest of World US (20%) Global GHG Emissions The US contributes the largest share of global GHG emissions… Source: WRI/CAIT, 2000 Data

  4. U.S. Emissions Mix % Share of Fuel Mix Source: IEA Statistics Source: WRI/CAIT 4

  5. GHG Flow Diagram: Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  6. GHG Flow Diagram: Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  7. State GHG Emissions, 2001MT CO2 eq of CO2, CH4, N2O, PFCs, SF6, includes land use Source: WRI/CAIT

  8. Change over 20th Century:Annual Mean Temperature ºF

  9. Americans may soon have to settle for a Non-Glacier National Park.

  10. Projections: future expectations for emissions

  11. US CO2 Emissions Projections Source: WRI/CAIT

  12. Projected Future GHG Emissions Growth % Percent change from 2000 Source: WRI, Baumert et al, 2005

  13. “Heat index” combines temperature and humidity to measure discomfort. Washington DC July heat index was 87°F in 1970, reaches about 98°F in a 2xCO2 world and 110°F in a 4xCO2 world. Under BAU, we’re headed for 4x.

  14. Drought Expectations The Palmer Index is most effective in determining long term drought—a matter of several months —and is not as good with short-term forecasts (a matter of weeks). It uses a 0 as normal, and drought is shown in terms of minus numbers; for example, minus 2 is moderate drought, minus 3 is severe drought, and minus 4 is extreme drought.

  15. A one meter sea level rise

  16. US Policy • Federal • State • Private Sector

  17. Bush Administration Climate/Energy Policy Initiatives • Goal: to reduce US GHG intensity by 18% by 2012 • Equivalent to ~4% reduction relative to BaU • Total emissions increase by 31% over 1990 levels • Further measures in 2012 if target not met • Voluntary initiatives • Improve voluntary registry (provide baseline to give “credits” for real reduction; likely to require legislation) • Climate VISION Partnership (12 sectors and BRT work with EPA, DOE, DOT and USDA to reduce GHG emissions) • Climate Leaders (EPA corporate partnership with individual companies; 50 companies now participating) • Fuel economy standards for light trucks (20.7mpg  22.2mpg by 2007) • Tax incentives for GHG reductions (RE, EE and sequestration)

  18. USG Roadmap for Climate Change TechnologyDevelopment and Deployment for the 21st Century Source: U.S. Climate Change Technology Program Strategic Plan, Draft for Public Comment – September 2005

  19. US Technology Program Budget

  20. US Climate Technology Program

  21. GHG reduction GHG Reporting Supporting International Negotiations Energy Policy Appropriations Power Plants Transport Hydrogen Clean Coal Carbon Sequestration Buildings Waste recycling Science/Research Numerous Proposals have been made in the US Congress… …although few have passed

  22. McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act • Summary: • A bill establishing a market-driven system of greenhouse gas tradable allowances • Cap: at 2000 levels by 2010 • Voting History: • October 2003: 43-55 • June 2005: 38 - 60

  23. Sense of the Senate (Vote 54-43) • Congress finds that— (1) greenhouse gases accumulating in the atmosphere are causing average temperatures to rise… and are posing a substantial risk…; (2) there is a growing scientific consensus that human activity is a substantial cause…; and (3) mandatory steps will be required to slow or stop the growth of greenhouse gas emissions …. • Sense of the Senate Congress should enact a comprehensive and effective national program of mandatory, market-based limits and incentives on emissions of greenhouse gases that slow, stop, and reverse the growth of such emissions…. -- US Senate: June 2005

  24. The Safe Climate Act of 2006 (H.R. 5642, Rep Waxman) • Freeze U.S. GHG emissions in 2010 at the 2009 levels.  • Beginning 2011, cuts emissions by roughly 2% per year (reaching 1990 emissions levels by 2020).  • After 2020, cuts emissions by roughly 5% per year (by 2050, emissions will be 80% lower than in 1990). • Implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through: • Cap-and-trade program (with auctioned permit revenues supporting “Climate Reinvestment Fund”) • Standards for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles that are at least as stringent as the current California standards.  EPA must tighten these standards in 2014 and periodically thereafter. • Standards requiring an increasing proportion of electricity to be generated from renewable energy sources, reaching 20% in 2020.  • Standards requiring utilities to obtain, each year, 1% of their energy supplies through end use energy efficiency improvements

  25. Climate Action Plans Source: Pew Climate Center

  26. Renewable Energy Mandates Source: Pew Climate Center

  27. States with Biofuel Mandates Ethanol Mandates Biodiesel Mandates Source: WRI, CAIT

  28. US Renewable Resources Source: U.S. Climate Change Technology Program Strategic Plan, Draft for Public Comment – September 2005 Geothermal

  29. US market developing too Goal: A regional cap-and-trade program initially covering CO2 emissions from power plants Stabilize emissions at base levels through 2014 Reduce by 10% by 2018 Region statistics: 7 states represent 7% US total GHG emissions  1.5% of world GHG emissions (Australia, rank 15th) Other states: MD (just signed), MA (expected to rejoin with new governor) 31

  30. California Policies • Transport • Starting in 2003,10% light duty vehicles to be zero emitting • 15% of buses with zero emissions by 2008 • Registry of GHGs (CCAR) • RPS: 20% by 2017 • $62 million public research program

  31. GHG and Fuel Economy Standards

  32. Fox News Climate Change Poll(October 25-26, 2005) “Do you think the Global warming situation is best described as a crisis, a major problem, or is it not problem at all?” “Who do you think should be mostly responsible for protecting the nation’s environment?”

  33. US Shareholder Resolutions on Climate Change 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: WRI based on Investor Network on Climate Risk

  34. Closing Thoughts

  35. Concluding Comments • Climate change impacts are already being seen in the US, and are projected to become more severe • Federal action is limited: The Bush Administration has paid only lip service to the problem, and Congress, while authoring many proposals, has passed very few • Most climate efforts are at the State and local level; these are beginning to shape both pubic opinion and corporate behavior. • For the foreseeable future, the US is likely to operate in a highly fragmented policy regime, including combinations of government regulations, markets and technology, augmented by private sector initiatives; these will vary from State to State and sector to sector. • Ultimately, the race is between effective policy and emissions reductions, and climate change and increased impacts. So far, impacts are winning. • This may change in the next presidential election – but perhaps less than many would wish as a result of the entrenched nature of the US energy sector in the economy

More Related