1 / 5

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS). Submission Title: [A critical view of the proposed compromise – A marketing perspective from customers] Date Submitted: [March 2004] Source: [Mark Fidler] Company [Hewlett Packard] E-mail [mark.fidler@hp.com]

fredblack
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [A critical view of the proposed compromise – A marketing perspective from customers] Date Submitted: [March 2004] Source: [Mark Fidler] Company [Hewlett Packard] E-mail [mark.fidler@hp.com] Re: [] Abstract: [This presentation takes a look at market requirements and defines who the market is that decides technology] Purpose: [] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual or organization. The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor reserves the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

  2. A critical view of the proposed compromise -A marketing perspective from customers- Mark Fidler Mark.Fidler@HP.com Hewlett Packard Mark Fidler, Hewlett Packard

  3. Ad Hoc and Multi Phy • Basis for the compromise was to have a dual PHY at a minimum. • Leaders in the Industry don’t want to start with a multi PHY endorsement • Multiple interoperability programs at the Wimedia (won’t happen) • Multiple solutions for WUSB promoters group (won’t happen) • Complexity in the channel • The common signaling mode isn’t a compromise proposal or interoperability proposal, it’s a co-existence proposal for dual PHY • Co-existence of other PHYs outside 15.3a may decide to place a mechanism to detect 3a preamble and include mechanism to coexist. • A true compromise proposal must be something that each side can find to be minimally acceptable. No one has proposed something that meets this requirement. Mark Fidler, Hewlett Packard

  4. Compromise? • A compromise or agreement is the package (combination of options across all issues) that both negotiators jointly agree upon after exchanging a sequence of offers. • The art of dividing a cake in such a way that everybody believes he got the biggest piece . • Placing an adversary in a position of vulnerability. • a middle way between two extremes • settlement of a difference of opinion in which both sides agree to give up a part of its demands. Mark Fidler, Hewlett Packard

  5. Deciding the requirements • We have a PAR, it is related to defining an alternative PHY. • We do not have a PAR for creating a specification for coexistence of multiple phy’s. (due diligence) • Fairness based on application and user priorities. • Mesh, mobility. • Dynamic range • Upper level logic and policy. • Use cases. • Etc. • Compromise should be a process between the authors, not a forced action. Mark Fidler, Hewlett Packard

More Related