Case study 3 the park east freeway corridor redevelopment plan
Download
1 / 32

Case Study #3: The Park East Freeway Corridor Redevelopment Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 124 Views
  • Uploaded on

Case Study #3: The Park East Freeway Corridor Redevelopment Plan. 64 acre site Planning began in middle 90s Demolition of elevated freeway began in late 2001; completed in early 2003. Park East Freeway Corridor Redevelopment Plan. Negative aspects of the existing spur: “over-designed”

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Case Study #3: The Park East Freeway Corridor Redevelopment Plan' - foy


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Case study 3 the park east freeway corridor redevelopment plan
Case Study #3: The Park East Freeway Corridor Redevelopment Plan

  • 64 acre site

  • Planning began in middle 90s

  • Demolition of elevated freeway began in late 2001; completed in early 2003


Park east freeway corridor redevelopment plan
Park East Freeway Corridor Redevelopment Plan Plan

  • Negative aspects of the existing spur:

    • “over-designed”

      • Elevated freeway

      • 3 lanes of traffic in both directions

    • Auto access to downtown/neighborhoods was limited to only two exits (like the sparse hierarchy)

    • Both a real and symbolic barrier separating downtown from the newly revitalizing neighborhoods to the north

    • Freeway spur “blighted” 64 acres of land, artificially depressing land values, not the “best and highest” use

    • Dominant land use adjacent to the spur was surface parking lots


The plan
THE PLAN Plan

1. Tear down the spur, and then…

2. Rebuild the street grid

  • Multiple routes into downtown and neighborhood

    3. Construct pedestrian scale and monumental boulevard as “gateway” to downtown where the spur once existed

    4. Free-up 64 acres of developable real estate

    5. Re-weave the fabric of downtown into the fabric of the neighborhoods creating the unified urban texture

    6. Develop the land, Increase the tax base

    7. Capitalize on the emerging downtown housing boom

    8. Create three “urban districts” each with it’s own identity

    9. Re-weave the River back into the fabric of the city, increase access to it, and elevate it to a natural and public amenity.





Case study 3 the park east freeway corridor redevelopment plan
4. “Re-weave” urban fabric of downtown into surrounding neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)


Re weaving implies mixed use
“Re-weaving” implies mixed use neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)


5 create 3 districts each with its own identity
5. Create 3 “districts”; each with its own identity neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)


Case study 3 the park east freeway corridor redevelopment plan

McKinley District: neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)

Corporate/hotel

Higher density

Still mixed use


Upper water lower rise and nearly exclusively residential
Upper Water: lower-rise and nearly exclusively residential neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)


6 re weave the river back into the city
6: “re-weave” the river back into the city neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)


Controversial elements of the plan
Controversial Elements of the Plan neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)

  • The Pro-Freeway Constituency

    • Loss of quick access

    • Loss of parking lots

  • The anti-gentrification Constituency

    • Housing activists

    • Community groups

      • Brewer’s Hill

      • Harambee


Community benefits agreement cba
Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) neighborhoods. (development will increase the tax base)

  • Affordable Housing Provision

  • “union wage” Provision

  • Minority contractors provision

  • Pros/Cons