1 / 55

Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts 2007

Tymoshevska Viktoriya , M&E Coordinator , “Together for Health” project. Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts 2007. Baseline Assessment (BL) Objectives.

Download Presentation

Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tymoshevska Viktoriya, M&E Coordinator, “Together for Health” project Baseline Assessments in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn Oblasts2007 Разом до Здоров’я фінансується Агенством США з Міжнародного Розвитку та впроваджується корпорацією Інститут Дослідництва та Тренінгів JSI у співробітництві з Академією Сприяння Освіті та Школою Громадського Здоров’я Гарвардського Університету

  2. Baseline Assessment (BL) Objectives • To document the initial status of family planning/reproductive health (FP/RH) in five oblasts – Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Poltava, Vinnytsa and Volyn - specifically regarding: • Attitudes of women of reproductive age (WRA) and health providers toward FP methods; • Practices of WRA (use of services and contraceptives); • Practices of providers (counseling on FP/RH), as reported by WRA and by providers; • Availability of IEC materials and contraceptives in health facilities and pharmacies; • To identify areas that need improvement.

  3. Baseline Assessment Methodology • Timeline:  Dnipropetrovsk – July 2007  Odessa - November 2007  Poltava – May 2007  Volyn oblast – April 2007  Vinnytsa – June 2007 Randomly selected health facilities that provide FP/RH services • Healthcare facilities: inpatientand outpatient; • Clients (WRA) not being treated for infertility or infertile; • Pharmacies: private and public; • Health providers: ob-gyns, nurses and midwives who work in health facilities that provide FP/RH services.

  4. Baseline Sample Characteristics

  5. Respondents’ (WRA) Characteristics

  6. Purpose of Visit to Health Facility

  7. Attitudes of Clients & Providers to Contraception

  8. WRA with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception: Condoms, IUDs, COCs

  9. WRA with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception: Injectables, LAM, EC

  10. Health Providers with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception: Condoms, IUDs, COCs

  11. Health Providers with Positive Attitudes toward Contraception: Injectables, LAM, EC

  12. Clients’Practices:Use of Contraception

  13. Contraceptive Use among Respondents WRA leaving health facilities

  14. Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast WRA leaving health facilities

  15. Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Odessa OblastWRA leaving health facilities

  16. Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Poltava OblastWRA leaving health facilities

  17. Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Vinnytsa OblastWRA leaving health facilities

  18. Contraceptive Use among Respondents, Volyn OblastWRA leaving health facilities

  19. Providers’ Practices:FP/RHCounseling and Services

  20. WRA Reporting Receiving Key Information during FP Counseling

  21. WRA Reporting Receiving Counseling on 3 out of 5 Key FP Topics

  22. WRA Reporting Receiving Counseling on Key STI Topics

  23. WRA Reporting Receiving Counseling on 2 out of 3 Key STI Topics

  24. WRA Assessments of Health Providers’ Practices

  25. WRA Perceptions of Services atHealth Facilities

  26. Health Providers’ Self-Reported FP Counseling Practices

  27. Health Providers’ Self-Reported Counseling on 3 out of 5 Key FP Topics

  28. Health Providers Self-Reported STI Counseling Practices

  29. Health Providers’ Self-Reported Counseling on 2 out of 3 Key STI Topics

  30. Availability of Contraceptive Methods/Brands in Health Facilities and Pharmacies

  31. Availability of any Free FP Method in Health Facilities

  32. Availability of Free COCs in Health Facilities

  33. Availability of Free Condoms in Health Facilities

  34. Availability of Free IUDs in Health Facilities

  35. Availability of Selected COC Brands in Pharmacies at Average Price BELOW 30 UAH Product average prices in UAH are indicated under the brand names.

  36. Availability of Selected COC Brands in Pharmacies at Average Price ABOVE 30 UAH

  37. Availability of other Hormonal Contraceptive Brands in Pharmacies

  38. Availability of IUDs and Condoms in Pharmacies

  39. Availabilityof Informational/Educational (IEC) Materials in Health Facilities and Pharmacies

  40. Availability of non-TfH IEC Materials on FP/RHin Health Facilities Posters on FP Brochures about FP Almost all IEC materials promote specific brands

  41. Availability of (non-TfH) IEC Materials on FP/RH in Pharmacies Posters on FP Brochures on FP

  42. Conclusions & Implications

  43. About the Study • Sample sizes and characteristics of the respondents were very similar across all five oblasts. Clients (WRA) • Average age was 27-29; • Marital status – either married or in union (>75% of all respondents); • Main reasons for visiting the health facility were: • Consultation • Annual check-up • Antenatal care; • Abortion and FP services comprised almost equal proportions of the reasons women visited health facilities—and was around 7%

  44. About the Study Health Facilities: • Approximately 50% of all health facilities surveyed in all oblasts were in-patient (e.g. maternities, ob/gyn departments) and the rest were outpatient (e.g. women consultations, FP centers); • On average each health facility had 5-8 ob-gyns, 7-10 midwives, 2 feldshers; Health Providers: • The majority of respondents where either ob-gyns or midwives; in a few cases they were nurses and feldshers; • On average, 3-5 health providers per health facility were asked to fill in the self-administered questionnaire; Pharmacies: • Over 70% of all assessed pharmacies were privately-owned and belonged to a chain; • One-third of pharmacies were located in the health facility that was assessed; the rest were located 500-1000 meters from the health facility; • Each pharmacy had 1-2 provisors, 2 pharmacists and 1 sales person;

  45. Attitudes toward FP Methods • The attitudes of WRA toward modern contraceptive methods were similar across all five oblasts: over 60% had a positive attitude toward condoms, IUDs and COCs (the three most widely used modern FP methods)—but there is still much work to be done; • Attitudes toward injectables and emergency contraception (EC) are quite negative: on average only 17% of WRA have positive attitudes toward EC and about 12% towards injectables; • Health providers have more positive attitudes to FP methods than WRA and, by providing quality FP counseling, have an opportunity to change attitudes of WRA and break existing barriers;

  46. Contraceptive Use (I) Contraceptive use varied across oblasts: • Use of modern methods differed substantially between the oblasts: • Highest use rate was in Dnipropetrovsk - 50% of respondents; • Lowest use rate was in Vinnytsa – 28%; • Odessa, Poltava and Volyn ranged from 30 to 40%; • Use of traditional methods was similar across oblasts – 7-8% (except Vinnytsa 4%); • The percentage of non-users ranged from 43% in Dnipropetrovsk to 68% in Vinnytsa;

  47. Contraceptive Use (II) • The method mix was very similar across all oblasts: • Condom use was around 20% (from 26% in Dnipropetrovsk to 14% in Poltava); • Use of COCs ranged from 8% in Volyn to 13% in Odessa; • Lowest IUD use was in Odessa, Vinnytsa and Volyn--5%-6%; highest was in Dnipropetrovsk and Poltava--10%-11%; • EC and spermicides were rarely used, according to respondents: • Only 3% of respondents across all oblasts used spermicides; • Only 1% used EC in Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa and Volyn;

  48. Contraceptive Use (III) • It is unclear why modern contraceptive use patterns are so different across the oblasts; • WRA still rely on only a few modern contraceptive methods: IUDs, condoms and COCs; • Women need more information about the range of modern methods, their risks and benefits so they can make informed decision about which method they will be using.

  49. FP and STI Counseling (I) • Women reported that about 70% of health providers in all oblasts cover at least 3 out of 5 key topics during FP counseling (except Volyn – 54%); • Women reported that two thirds of health providers across the oblasts cover 2 out of 3 key topics in STI counseling (except Volyn – 55%); • Some oblasts need to improve the quality of FP/RH and STI counseling;

  50. FP and STI Counseling (II) • Health providers state that they provide more information than is reported by the women: • On average 85% of health providers across the oblasts state that they always mention at least 3 out of 5 key FP topics; • And 75% of health providers in all oblasts state that they always mention at least 2 out of 3 key STI topics;

More Related