570 likes | 921 Views
Sepsis. Jay Green, PGY-4 Dr. Jason Lord August 20, 2009. Thanks. Dr. Jason Lord Dr. Dan Howes Dr. Trevor Langhan Dr. Aric Storck. Outline. Case Definitions Keys to sepsis management. Epidemiology. Why is sepsis important?. Not all SIRS is Sepsis. SIRS (2 of) T<36 or >38 HR>90
E N D
Sepsis Jay Green, PGY-4 Dr. Jason Lord August 20, 2009
Thanks Dr. Jason Lord Dr. Dan Howes Dr. Trevor Langhan Dr. Aric Storck
Outline Case Definitions Keys to sepsis management
Epidemiology Why is sepsis important?
Not all SIRS is Sepsis SIRS (2 of) T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2 < 32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands
Definitions SIRS Sepsis Severe sepsis Septic shock
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands
The Septic Spectrum SIRS SEPSIS Mortality:10% SEVERE SEPSIS Mortality:16% SEPTIC SHOCK Mortality:46%
Case You think he’s septic ?Pulmonary source?
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands
Survival With Delay in ABX Kumar et al. Crit Care Med 2006;34(6):1589
Source of Infection • Abx keys • Get them in fast! • Culture first • Source control • ?MRSA/pseudomonas Kumar et al. Crit Care Med 2006;34(6):1589
ABX Selection • Chest • Levo + ceftriaxone • Azithro + ceftriaxone • Tazo/Cipro (nursing home, etc) • Abdo • Pip/tazo or AGF or ceftriaxone/Flagyl • GU • Gent or ceftriaxone • Skin • Ancef +/- vanco • Head • Ceftriazone + vanco + dex
Guidelines • Surviving Sepsis Campaign • Crit Care Med 2008;36(1):296 • CAEP • CJEM 2008 Sept;10(5):443
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands
Case What does our patient have?
Case • Investigations? • Initial management priorities?
Case • Reassess our patient • Why is lactate important?
The Septic Spectrum SIRS SEPSIS Mortality:10% SEVERE SEPSIS Mortality:16% SEPTIC SHOCK Mortality:46% EGDT EGDT Mortality: 30%
In-hospital mortality • 46.5% vs 30.5% (NNT = 6!) • 60-day mortality • 56.9% vs 44.3% • EGDT got more early fluid, pRBC, inotropes
What Are The Components of Septic Shock ✓ • Hypovolemic • Distributive • Cardiogenic • Obstructive ✓ ✓ ✗ Hinshaw & Cox. The Fundamental Mechanisms in Shock. Plenum Press, New York. 1972.
Hypovolemic Distributive Cardiogenic
Hypovolemic Shock • Why are patients in hypovolemic shock? • Venodilation • 3rd spacing • Losses (vomiting, diaphoresis) • Recent poor PO intake • Crystalloid vs colloid?
Cochrane review, 2005 VISEP. NEJM 2008;358:125-39 NS – cheap, available – USE IT NEJM 2004;350:2247
Guidelines • Surviving Sepsis Campaign • Colloid or crystalloid • CAEP • Colloid or crystalloid Crit Care Med 2008;36(1):296
New and interesting • Voluven • Lu et al. 2009 Mar;21(3):143-6 • ?lung-protective in rabbits • Palumbo et al. 2006;72(7-8):655 • Improved hemodynamics and APACHE-II score • Franziska et al. 2009;35(9):1539 • Similar rates of ARF as albumin in surgical ICU pts
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands EGDT CVP 8-12 Crystalloid (1L q30min)
Vasopressin? Should we use vasopressin in sepsis?
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands EGDT CVP 8-12 Crystalloid (1L q30min) MAP > 65 NE 0.1-2ug/kg/min OR dopamine 5-20ug/kg/min
Blood Transfusion • EGDT • If ScvO2<70% and hct<0.30 • TRICC • If Hb > 70g/L • How does this help? • O2 content = (1.34 x Hb x SaO2) + (0.0031 x PO2)
Results • No difference in 30 or 60 day mortality • Restrictive group • Lower in-hospital mortality • 22.2% vs 28.1% (p=0.005) • Less sick pts (APACHE II score <20) did better • ARR 7.4% (95%CI 1.0 – 13.6%) • No difference in mortality in sepsis sub-group NEJM 1999;340:409
TRICC vs EGDT • EGDT • Hypovolemic ED patients • Actual measurement of suboptimal O2 delivery • TRICC • Euvolemic pts enrolled within 72 hours of ICU admit • 6% sepsis, 27% had any infection
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands EGDT CVP 8-12 Crystalloid (1L q30min) MAP > 65 NE 0.1-2ug/kg/min OR dopamine 5-20ug/kg/min ScvO2 > 70% pRBC (hct>0.30) dob 2-20ug/kg/min
Etomidate • Absalom 1999, Malerba 2005, Vinclair 2007 • Single dose inhibits cortisol synthesis for 24-48h • Mohammed 2006, Ray 2007, Riche 2007 • Studies designed for etomidate vs no etomidate • No increase in mortality • CORTICUS (2008) • >28d mort with one dose (OR 1.53 (1.06-2.26)) • Etomidate non-randomized, post-hoc analysis • Bottom line • Avoid in sepsis
SIRS T<36 or >38 HR>90 RR>20, pCO2<32 WBC<4, >12 or >10% bands EGDT CVP 8-12 Crystalloid (1L q30min) MAP > 65 NE 0.1-2ug/kg/min OR dopamine 5-20ug/kg/min ScvO2 > 70% pRBC (hct>0.30) dob 2-20ug/kg/min ARDSNet TV 6cc/kg PEEP Pplateau<30
Steroids • Early studies - no benefit • NEJM 1987; 317: 659-65, NEJM 1987; 317: 653-58 • Increased mortality at higher doses • Crit Care Med. 1995; 23: 1430-39 • Annane – benefit in non-responders • JAMA 2002;288(7) • CORTICUS – no benefit • NEJM 2008;358(2) • Annane - benefit in subgroup • JAMA 2009 June;301(22)