Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

civil liberties first amendment freedoms n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms

play fullscreen
1 / 146
Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms
171 Views
Download Presentation
fleur
Download Presentation

Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Chapter 5 Text Chapter 3 p. 103 Woll Reader

  2. A Commitment to Freedom • The listing of the general rights of the people can be found in the first ten amendments in the Constitution, also known as the Bill of Rights. • The 13th and 14th amendments have also added to the Constitution’s guarantees of personal freedom.

  3. Civil liberties definitions • In general, civil liberties are protections against government. • They are guarantees of the safety of persons, opinions, and property from arbitrary acts of government. • Personal Rights of Citizens

  4. Protection of Civil Liberties • InstitutionalCourts’ decisions on constitutionality of laws in violation of fundamental freedoms • Political Arousal of public support for principles of liberty by political and social leaders

  5. The Bill of Rights 1791 • Reason For or in Support See outline notes. LIST FOUR • Reasons Against Protection in the Ninth Amendment (1791) See outline notes • Article IV, section 2 “QUOTE FROM NOTES”

  6. The 9th Amendment • “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” • The Ninth Amendment states that the American people possess rights that are not set out explicitly in the Constitution. • It has been used to protect rights as various as the rights of the accused to a woman’s right to abortion without undue interference by government.

  7. 1) The Ninth Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights • over the objections of Anti-Federalists • to protect rights which were not specifically listed • so that the states could not violate individual rights • in an effort to reserve specific rights for the states

  8. Limited Government • Throughout the Constitution, the extent of governmental authority is strictly limited. Article I, Section 10 No bills of attainder • No ex post facto laws • The rights that the Constitution guarantees to citizens are also limited. • People in the United States are free to do as they please as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others. Rights are relative. • Sometimes, different rights conflict with one another, such as the freedom of the press and the right to a fair trial. • Not all rights are guaranteed to aliens, who are foreign-born residents or non-citizens. For instance, their right to travel is often restricted.

  9. The Bill of Rights The most famous of the Constitution’s guarantees apply only to the National Government, not the government of the States. The Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights only restricts the National Government in Barron v. Baltimore, (1833). The Modifying Effect of the 14th Amendment The 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause provides that no State can “deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law…”. WOLL p.106 However, to include rights under that heading, the Supreme Court had to define the rights on a case by case basis, called the process of incorporation. *** Gitlow v. New York (1925) DISCUSS See outline notes. Federalism and Individual Rights

  10. 2) The principle that the Supreme Court currently uses to extend the Bill of Rights to the Fourteenth Amendment is called • Incorporation • Bad tendency doctrine • A nonpreferential view • The accommodationist twist

  11. 3) The First Amendment clearly limits the powers of the • Supreme Court • Congress • President • State governments • Local governments • See Barron v. Baltimore

  12. 4) The significance of the Gitlow v. New York (1925) case was that it • mandated that state governments uphold the provisions of the federal Bill of Rights • interpreted the death penalty as a cruel and unusual punishment • upheld the constitutionality of the exclusionary rule • outlawed reverse discrimination

  13. 5) States are now prohibited from infringing upon the rights protected by the Federal Bill of Rights because • an executive order issued by President Washington • a provision in the Fourteenth amendment • legislative action by the first Congress • an introduction to the document which mandates it

  14. 6)When creating the Constitution, The Founding Fathers did not include a bill of rights because • they had too many other issues to consider • they were unsure of what to include • they believed such a bill was unnecessary because the states already had such protections • James Madison lobbied against such a bill Check Woll p. 103

  15. The First Amendment Freedoms • Freedom of Speech • Freedom of Press • Freedom of Assembly • Freedom of Petition • Freedom of Religion

  16. 7) The First Amendment protects all of the following freedoms EXCEPT: • Religion • Choice • Press • Assembly • Privacy

  17. Freedom of Speech: One • Freedom of Speech guarantees are meant to: • Protect each person’s right of free expression, whether spoken, written, or communicated in any other way. • Protect all persons’ right to a complete discussion of public affairs.

  18. Speech • Slander, the false and malicious use spoken words • ObscenityWords that incite others to commit crimes

  19. Seditious Speech Sedition is the crime of attempting to overthrow the government by force, or to disrupt its lawful activities by violent acts. Seditious speech is speech that urges such conduct.

  20. Congress has enacted three major laws to prevent sedition and seditious speech: • The Alien and Sedition Acts—made scandalous or false criticism of the government illegal. Expired before Thomas Jefferson took office in 1801. • Espionage Act 1917 Felony to cause insubordination in the army or interfere with enlistment. DISCUSS Schenck v. United States (1919) • And Abrams v. United States (1919) Schenck p.504-505 • The Sedition Act of 1917-1918—made it a crime to encourage disloyalty or spread anti-government ideas during a time of crisis. Upheld by the Supreme Court in instances of “clear and present danger.” • The Smith Act of 1940—forbade advocating violent overthrow of the government, and belonging knowingly to any group that does. The Supreme Court still upholds the constitutionality of the law, but over time has modified it so that it is difficult to enforce. Yates v. US (1957) and Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

  21. 8) Oliver Wendell Holmes first announced the celebrated clear and present danger doctrine in the case of • A. Barron v. Baltimore • B. Gitlow v. New York • C. Schenck v. United States • D. Lemon v. Kurtzman

  22. Symbolic speech is expression by conduct. Tinker vs. Des Moines Thought provoking or provocative IS protected. Supreme Court rulings show that the blanket of symbolic speech covers only so much. It does not cover destroying draft cards United States v. O’Brien, (1968) but it does encompass flag burning Texas v. Johnson, (1989), and United States v. Eichman, (1990). Symbolic Speech

  23. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) • Fighting words that incite are NOT protected.

  24. 9) The Constitution protects speech that is • Provocative • Obscene • Seditious • Libelous • Abusive

  25. 10) A case that expanded the concept of symbolic speech to include the wearing of armbands in protest was • A. Tinker v. Des Moines • B. Engel v. Vitale • C. Mapp v. Ohio • D. Bakke v. Regents

  26. Freedom of the Press: Two • Obscenity laws are enforced under the postal power (Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 of the Constitution). Obscenity Test laid out in Miller v. California, (1973) • 1) The average person finds that the work appeals to “prurient interests” judging from contemporary standards. • 2) The work describes offensive sexual conduct that is specifically outlawed as obscene. • 3) The work lacks serious value of any variety.

  27. 11) Under the first amendment which Supreme Court decision set forth a 3 part test for determining obscenity? • Everson v. Board of Education • Lemon v. Kurtzman • Wallace v. Jaffree • Miller v. California

  28. 12) Constitutional protection is withheld from • Adult Books • Adult Magazines • Adult Movies • Sexually explicit photographs of minors

  29. Freedom of Press does not protect: • Libel, the false and malicious use of written words • CASES New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) • Woll page120

  30. 13) Which of the following cases set guidelines for libel cases? • A. N. Y. Times v. United States • B. N. Y. Times v. Sullivan • C. Palko v. Connecticut • D. Near v. Minnesota

  31. Censorship In most cases, the government cannot curb ideas before they are expressed. It can punish ideas after they are expressed.

  32. Prior Restraint • The Supreme Court has held in several cases that the guarantee of a free press does not allow the government to exercise prior restraint on publication except in grave circumstances. In Near v. Minnesota (1931), the Court protected the rights of even “miscreant purveyors of scandal.” • In New York Times v. United States, (1971), the government sought a court order to keep newspapers from printing “the Pentagon Papers” which had been stolen and leaked to the press. The Supreme Court found that the government couldn’t show that the papers endangered national security enough to justify prior restraint of publication.

  33. 14) The term “prior restraint” would most likely be used in which of the following actions? • Arrest • Censorship • Amnesty • Sentencing for a crime

  34. 15) Which of the following cases dealt with “prior restraint”? • N. Y. Times v. United States • N. Y. Times v. Sullivan • Wisconsin v. Yoder • Snepp v. United States

  35. Snepp v. United States (1980) • CIA Permissible Prior Restraint • FREE PRESS v. FAIR TRIAL • Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976)

  36. Freedom of Assembly: Three The Constitution guarantees “…the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” • The right to assemble, or gather with one another to express views. • The right to bring views to the attention of public officials.

  37. Time, Place and Manner Restrictions • Picketing, the patrolling of a business site by workers on strike, is a prevalent form of symbolic speech. • CASES Gregory v. Chicago, Hill v. Colorado, and Madsen

  38. Public Property

  39. Time-Place-Manner Regulations The government can make and enforce rules regarding the time, place, and manner of assemblies. • An example of such a rule is that public areas near schools and courthouses are restricted. • The government’s rules must becontent neutral.They can place restrictions of the basis of the time, place and manner of the assembly, but not on what the assembly is trying to say on PUBLIC PROPERTY.

  40. Private Property The rights of assembly and petition do not give people a right to trespass on private property. States can interpret their constitutions to require owners of private property, such as shopping centers, to allow people to petition on their property.

  41. Private Property • Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner (1972) • HOSTILE AUDIENCES Feiner v. New York (1952)

  42. 16) Time, place, and manner restrictions on freedom of expression are generally upheld by the courts if they • give local authorities adequate discretion to enforce them • apply only to obscene materials or libelous statements • do not make it overly difficult for a person to share their ideas with others • are not applied to traditional public forums such as street corners and public parks

  43. 17) Peaceful picketing • is protected absolutely by the First amendment • may only be regulated by Congress • may be regulated by the states under certain conditions • may be regulated by the states unconditionally

  44. The guarantees of freedom of assembly and petition include aright of association—the right to associate with others to promote causes. The freedom of association also means that a State cannot force an organization to accept members when that association would contradict what the organization believes in. Freedom of Association

  45. Freedom of Religion: Five Two guarantees of religious freedom: Establishment Clause • Guards against establishing a mandated religion. • In effect, freedom from religion Free Exercise Clause • Guards against the government interfering in the exercise of any religion. • In effect, freedom for religion.

  46. Church and government are constitutionally separated from one another. However, the government supports churches and religion in a variety of ways, including tax exemption. Separation of Church and StateA wall of separation?

  47. Everson v. Board of Education (1947) • The court did not rule on the meaning of the Establishment Clause until Everson which incorporated the clause to apply to the states.

  48. 18) In the Supreme Court case Everson v. Board of Education a “wall of separation” was created between church and state, which clause created the wall? • Establishment clause • Free Exercise clause • Due Process clause • Necessary and proper clause

  49. Court definition of the Establishment Clause • “Neither a state nor the federal government can set up a church, nor pass laws which aid one religion, all religions, or prefer one religion over another.” • “Neither can force a person to go to or remain away from a church against his will or force him to profess a belief or a disbelief in any religion.” • Finally, the government may not participate in religious affairs nor impose taxes for their support.

  50. McCullom v. Board of Education (1948) • Question:  • Did the use of the public school system for religious classes violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause?