regulating dangerous dogs
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 114 Views
  • Uploaded on

REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS. TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN?. John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International Municipal Lawyers Association 2008 Annual Conference. Headlines. Pit Bulls maul, kill boy in father’s back yard Charlotte Observer

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS' - feryal


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
regulating dangerous dogs

REGULATINGDANGEROUS DOGS

TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN?

John D. Joye, Esq.

Senior Assistant City Attorney

City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office

International Municipal Lawyers Association

2008 Annual Conference

headlines
Headlines
  • Pit Bulls maul, kill boy in father’s back yardCharlotte Observer
  • Father’s Pit Bulls maul Charlotte Boy to death Los Angeles Times
  • NC Boy killed by Father’s Pit Bulls AP
  • 4 Pitbulls kill Boy, 8 Sunday Mirror, London, England
  • Boy, 8, killed by dad’s dogs Sunday Mercury, Birmingham, England
can cities regulate dogs
Can cities regulate dogs?

YES

Dogs = Property

No Fundamental Right

  • Sentell v. New Orleans 1897
  • Nicchia v. New York 1920
  • Altman v. High Point 2003
  • New York City Friends of Ferrets v. City of New York

1995

how will you regulate
How will you regulate?

To Ban?

Breed Specific

Legislation

“BSL”

Not to Ban?

Dog Specific

Legislation

“Non – BSL”

breed specific ban
Breed Specific Ban

Does your state allow it?

  • Ohio does it.
  • 11 states forbid it.
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Florida
  • Maine
  • Minnesota
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Oklahoma
  • Pennsylvania
  • Texas
  • Virginia
slide8
HSUS Statement on Dangerous Dogs and Breed-Specific Legislation

The Humane Society of the United States offers the following position regarding breed-specific policies.

The HSUS opposes legislation aimed at eradicating or strictly regulating dogs based solely on their breed for a number of reasons. Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is a common first approach that many communities take. Thankfully, once research is conducted most community leaders correctly realize that BSL won't solve the problems they face with dangerous dogs.

There are over 4.5 million dog bites each year. This is an estimate as there is no central reporting agency for dog bites, thus breed and other information is not captured. Out of the millions of bites, about 10-20 are fatal each year. While certainly tragic, it represents a very small number statistically and should not be considered as a basis for sweeping legislative action….

Full statement available at www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/dangerous_dogs.html

bsl issues pitfalls
BSL: Issues & Pitfalls

Equal Protection

  • Over-breadth
  • Under-inclusive

Takings

  • Fair & just compensation

Due Process

  • Substantive
  • Procedural
    • Vagueness

No Fundamental Right

Rational Relation Test

equal protection
EQUAL PROTECTION

“[I]f the classification has some reasonable basis, it does not offend the Constitution simply because the classification is not made with mathematical nicety or because the practice results in some inequality.”

Dandridge v. Williams, (1970)

“The legislature may select one phase of one field and apply a remedy there, neglecting others.”

Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., (1955)

takings
TAKINGS

“Even were it assumed that dogs are property in the fullest sense of the word, they would still be subject to the police power of the state, and might be destroyed or otherwise dealt with…”

Sentell v. New Orleans & C. R. Co., (1897)

  • Limited Geographic Area
due process
DUE PROCESS

VAGUENESS

  • Name
  • Physical Characteristics
  • Hybrids

PROCEDURAL

  • Notice & Hearing
  • Meaningful – prior to destruction
  • Neutral fact-finder
hard questions hard issues
Hard Questions / Hard Issues
  • Which breeds to ban
  • How do you define
  • Ban vs. restrain
  • Partial Ban + restrain
  • Appeals / process
  • Moving target
  • Promote the breed
  • Enforcement resources
  • Humane Concerns
fatalities v bites
Fatalities v. Bites

ANNUAL DOG BITES

  • 4.7 Million
  • 800,000 victims seek medical attention
    • Half are children
  • 386,000 require ER treatment
  • Kids 5-9 highest rate of injury

D.B.R . FATALITY

  • Apprx. 18 per year
  • 2007 had apprx. 33
  • Dog-Bite-Related Fatalities -- United States, 1995-1996
  • Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998
  • www.cdc.gov
dog specific
Dog Specific

“Totality of Circumstances”

Dangerous  means any animal whose behavior, temperament, size, or any combination thereof, when considered under the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the surrounding area, constitutes a reasonable risk of injuring a human or animal or damaging personal or real property.

Charlotte City Code §3-3

www.municode .com

controls to consider
Controls to Consider

Mechanisms

  • Reporting
  • Seizure
  • Process
  • Aggression training
  • Multiple dogs

Toolbox

  • Restraints
  • Insurance
  • Fertility
  • Destruction
animal care control resources
Animal Care & ControlResources
  • Staffing
  • Budget
  • Dogs per year
  • Volunteers
  • Adoption
  • Rendering
ad