1 / 30

Literacy Design Collaborative Disciplinary Reading and Working on Modules Day 3 Frank Duffin LDC Program Manager & S

Literacy Design Collaborative Disciplinary Reading and Working on Modules Day 3 Frank Duffin LDC Program Manager & Secondary Literacy Consultant. Goals of the LDC Workshop. Share lessons learned from Days 1 and 2 trainings and task implementation specific to each discipline.

fern
Download Presentation

Literacy Design Collaborative Disciplinary Reading and Working on Modules Day 3 Frank Duffin LDC Program Manager & S

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Literacy Design Collaborative Disciplinary Reading and Working on Modules Day 3 Frank DuffinLDC Program Manager & Secondary Literacy Consultant

  2. Goals of the LDC Workshop • Share lessons learned from Days 1 and 2 trainings and task implementation specific to each discipline. • Scaffold literacy skills to advance achievement in the discipline area. • Fully develop a Module using Task 2 for jurying.

  3. Before we begin, let’s take a temperature check. • What are you pondering? • What is working so far? • What questions do you have? • 4. What help do you need?

  4. Two Approaches to Secondary Literacy Instruction • Content area reading • Disciplinary literacy

  5. Guiding Question: • How do you develop tasks that engage and apprentice students in reading and responding to challenging texts in your discipline?

  6. But… • Disciplinary literacy is the approach that the common core has taken. • Let’s… • explore dimensions of disciplinary literacy • distinguish between content area reading and disciplinary literacy

  7. Comparing Content Area Reading and Disciplinary Literacy

  8. Skill specialized to history, science, literature, math, and Career and Technical Education Disciplinary Literacy IntermediateLiteracy Generic comprehension strategies, common word meanings, & basic fluency BasicLiteracy Decoding and knowledge of high frequency words.

  9. Characteristics of Science Reading (Fang & Schleppergrell) • Technical, abstract, dense, tightly knit language (that contrasts with interactive, interpersonal style of other texts or ordinary language) • Nominalization (turning processes into nouns) • Suppresses agency (readers need to focus on causation not intention) • Sentence density: unpacking complex nouns • Experimental verification of Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect was made 11 years later by the American physicist Robert Millikan. Every aspect of Einstein’s interpretation was confirmed, including the direct proportionality of photon energy to frequency.

  10. Physicist’s Notebook

  11. Chemistry Reading • Text provides knowledge that allows prediction of how the world works • Full understanding needed of experiments or processes • Close connections among prose, graphs, charts, formulas (alternative representations of constructs an essential aspect of chemistry text) • Major reading strategies include corroboration and transformation

  12. Chemistry Note-taking

  13. Math Reading • Goal: arrive at “truth” • Importance of “close reading” an intensive consideration of every word in the text • Rereading a major strategy • Heavy emphasis on error detection • Precision of understanding essential

  14. Mathematics Notebook

  15. History Reading • History is interpretative, and authors and sourcing are central in interpretation (consideration of bias and perspective) • Often seems narrative without purpose and argument without explicit claims (need to see history as argument based on partial evidence; narratives are more than facts) • Single texts are problematic (no corroboration)

  16. History Events Chart

  17. Literature Reading • Understanding the rhetorical tools (symbolism, irony, satire, points of view, unreliable narration) that authors employ in narratives is necessary to understand a range of warrantable interpretations of complex literary works • Reading deeply complex literary texts offers unique opportunities for students to wrestle with some of the core ethical dilemmas that we face as human beings. --Lee & Spratley, Reading in the Disciplines (2010)

  18. Character Change Chart Crisis Given this character change, what do you think the author wanted you to learn? ________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________

  19. Content Area Reading • Has long history in education • Many secondary teachers have preparation in content area reading • Lots of books and resources for teachers

  20. Please move into disciplinary tables as directed. Create a poster that identifies the requirements of reading in your content area.Be ready to share with the group. Disciplinary Literacy Jigsaw Using your homework . . .

  21. The Final Word • Select a facilitator and timekeeper. • One person volunteers to “lead off”—taking up to three minutes to talk about one idea. • Moving in clockwise fashion, every other group member, in turn, takes up to one minute to respond to speaker. • Finally, the opening speaker has one minute to make final comments. • Repeat the above process for the next person.

  22. Back to the work at hand . . . Module Using all the resources available, continue filling in (or polishing) your Module using the template provided..

  23. Discipline Reports: Questions, Thoughts, and Insights With your discipline team: • Describe one module-in-progress and discuss your questions, thoughts, and insights about module development. • Be prepared to briefly report out to the large group.

  24. Lunch Again!

  25. Taking a look at Good-to-Go • What does a publishable module look like? • Examining the Jurying Tool

  26. Become the Judge and Jury • With a partner from your content area, evaluate each partner’s module using the Jurying Tool. • Make notes of changes that need to be made. • Work on making the Task Good-to-Go • PSESD trainer will work with individuals

  27. Thank You! Have an exceptional year and send your complete module by to: Next Steps: fduffin@psesd.org

More Related