390 likes | 482 Views
Explore the evolution of teaching, learning, and research at Tufts University through the Perseus Project led by Gregory Crane, Winnick Family Chair of Technology and Entrepreneurship. Delve into the historical significance of the Gettysburg Address and the transition from oratory to mass communication. Uncover the role of cyberinfrastructure in shaping modern education and the potential impact on future generations.
E N D
Waiting for the Gettysburg Address or Gregory Crane Professor of Classics Winnick Family Chair of Technology and Entrepreneurship Tufts University
A Phase Shift in Teaching, Learning, and Research? Gregory Crane Professor of Classics Winnick Family Chair of Technology and Entrepreneurship Tufts University
Perseus Project • DL development 1987- • Ancient Greco-Roman Culture • DLI-2: “A Digital Library for the Hum.” • Up through early 20th century • Calculatedly disparate collections • Production: www.perseus.tufts.edu • 9million pages/month, 85% Greco-Roman • Research: what characterizes cultural DLs? • Audience / Services / Content Model Triad • Cross-over: e.g. NSDL work
The True Gettysburg Addresser • Edward Everett (1794-1865) • First Eliot Professor of Greek at Harvard • Member of Congress • Governor of Mass • Minister to England • President of Harvard • Secretary of State • US Senator • Candidate for VP
Everett’s Address • Long -- and meant to be long • Learned: Athens and America • Sense of place, time and heritage • Historical: who did what • Epic in spirit: recounted what happened • Particularist: celebrated particular events • Fixing memory
Lincoln’s Address • Short -- and meant to be short • General: very little specific background • “four score and seven” but little else • Analytical: what does this mean? • Lyric in spirit • Generalizing: abstracting from particulars • Details filtered out
Gettysburg Address • A Particular Historical Transition • Decline of the orator/preacher • Decline of learned humanist culture • Rise of the brief communication to a mass audience • A General Historical Process • Superficially: from elite to mass • In fact: creation of new elite
Cyberinfrastructure • Collaboration, Interdisciplinarity • More praised than truly practiced • Social barriers and intellectual limits • Cyberinfrastructure • Potential “document/dbase solvent” • Recombinant DNA model • Lincoln replacing Everett
Human beings are curious • [US Citizens are human beings!] • Mass Media Outlets • Discovery Channel, History Channel, PBS • American Experience vs. Antiques Road Show • Diverse topics of public interest: • Civil War, Railroad, Quilts, Greek Revival etc.
Role of Government? • Models for Cyberinfrastructure • National Parks: public space • Museums: objects and themes • Public Libraries: broad education/engagement • Public Education: universal in reach • Public records, e.g., historical commissions
Universal “Literacy” • Reading as a general term • Analyze/relate new experience to old/learn • Language: natural, mathematical, computational • Pictures • 3D objects • Spaces • Example: choosing a home
Readable Space • Recommender systems in place • Shared data: Real Estate MLS system • Multiple views of the same data • Multiple dimensions to be explored: • Hayes/Mcdonnell family - text/genealogy • Architecture: Greek Revival/1840s • Space: Fresh Pond/Mt Auburn Cemetery
Innovations • Technical infrastructure • Databases, front end design, etc. • Established technologies • Engineering rather than fundamental research • Social Infrastructure key • Darwinian competitition for listings/sales • Realtor/Realtor Agency/Agency • Multiple Listing Service • Dual Representation System
Cyberinfrastructure • “Next Big Thing” • Managed by NSF, seeking billions • Will pbly go farther • New infrastructure for research assumes • Interdisciplinary work • Evolving disciplines (e.g., Bioinformatics) • Change as constant • How does the NSDL fit in?
Cyberinfrastructure: 1 • We here are not the primary audience • We are trustees for subsequent generations • Need to face radically different environments • Need to separate strategic values from material habits -- e.g., oral vs. literate poetry • Question:given a 5-10 year lag time • How we will support those now 20 and younger?
Cyberinfrastructure: 2 • Document - Reader is second order relation • Many Doc-Doc conversations precede • DL System customizes information up front • The Digital Library • Provides dynamic reading environment • Automatically updates itself • Constitutes the center of gravity • Even without integrated DL, will our students carry piles of paper or libraries with them?
Cyberinfrastructure: 3 • A networked world removes physical barriers surrounding academic info/ideas • K-12 students/faculty only one component • History Museums -- MOST influential source • Historical Societies, Historical Commissions • History Channel, American Experience • Hollywood and historical fiction • Like the NSDL, it must support K-gray intellectual life • Rosenzweig & Thelen, Presence of the Past • http://chnm.gmu.edu/survey/
Cyberinfrastructure: 4 • (At least) three interacting variables • Services -- what real people can do • Audiences -- who does what • Data -- what resources are available • Each drives the other two, e.g. • New data (GENOME, Geospatial, language) • --> new questions --> new audiences --> new services --> new data • We need to think about all three
Technologies • Machine translation • Bad translation opens up new worlds • E.g., Later Latin and European High Culture • Language Technologies • Monolingual vs. Multilingual • Encyclopedic vs. Semantic
Language Technologies • Cambridge Civil War Monument (1870) • Making the visible readable • Augmented Reality BUT • This is also a language technology problem
Cambridge Civil War Monument • Lists of Names --> Contextualizing info • City Dir: Sam Palmer was a clerk at the Suffolk Bank and lived on 111 Inman Street • What sort of work did he do? • Who else lived on Inman Street? • He was in the Mass 11 and died at Four Forks • Where did this regiment go? • What was it doing at Four Forks?
Basic Technologies • Single Document Summarization • Multidocument Summarization • Named Entity Detection & Tracking • Relation Detection and Tracking • Customization for particular users
Making Space Readable • Graphical interfaces necessary • Augmented/virtual reality • Geospatial Coordinates --> GIS • Customization • Summarization
Graphical Visualizations of Text • Maps: Global, Regional, City • Integration of text and GIS • Timelines • Dynamic, multiple scales • Event Detection • Multiple tools
Underlying Architecture • Common schemes for naming • “Mark Twain” and “Samuel Clemens” • --> “Twain, Mark, 1835-1910” • Similar conventions for structure, actions, etc. • Documents talk to each other • Atlas/GIS, Encyclopedias, Glossaries • Systems customize data for users • Background & present goals • Systems control the look and feel
Conclusions • Design issues are central • Front-end design is necessary but not sufficient • Few care about our unique “look & feel” • Our sites provide means not ends • http://www.digitalpreservation.gov • Key Challenge: Clean Atomic Structures • Every component in a document should be • Easily abstractable • Freely re-usable • Assume cherry-picking as the norm
Conclusions • Everett, not Lincoln, has been our model • Experts are at the center • Very heavy expectations on our audience • Large, self-contained, introspective docs • Support democratization of knowledge • Lincoln’s more accessible language • Watch for and help define new elites • NSDL as a catalyst in a much larger process