1 / 6

North Minneapolis Public Employment Programming – A Data Analysis

North Minneapolis Public Employment Programming – A Data Analysis. Mark Brinda City of Minneapolis 6.24.14. DEED WF1 Data. Northside Project: DEED program participants exiting in 2013 June 2014 Baseline

feo
Download Presentation

North Minneapolis Public Employment Programming – A Data Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. North Minneapolis Public Employment Programming – A Data Analysis Mark Brinda City of Minneapolis 6.24.14

  2. DEED WF1 Data Northside Project: DEED program participants exiting in 2013 June 2014 Baseline • There were 3,720 participants from north Minneapolis exiting in 2013; of those, 3,357 were over the age of 16 years; unless otherwise noted, tables below are based on working-age participants. Definitions • Participants = anyone exiting between Jan 1-Dec 31, 2013 from an eligibility-based DEED program whose residence zip code was 55405, 55411, 55412, or 55430. • Exitersincluded people whose exit reasons were “moved from area”, “returned to school”, “sanction/closed” [MFIP], as well as “entered unsubsidized employment” • Working-age participants = participants over the age of 16 years. • Wages = taken from MN Unemployment Insurance Wage Detail; hourly wages less than $4.25 or greater than $90 were excluded from analysis (DEED’s experience is that number of hours worked may rarely be filled in incorrectly).

  3. by race/Ethnicity & Gender

  4. By Age & Offender Status

  5. By Education and Program

  6. By industry

More Related