1 / 21

Emerging Policy Trends For Innovative Project Delivery

Emerging Policy Trends For Innovative Project Delivery. Christopher D. Lloyd DBIA Water & Wastewater/Transportation Joint Program April 21, 2010. Presentation Overview. America’s Infrastructure Crisis Historical Solutions Public Policy Barriers and Opportunities

fell
Download Presentation

Emerging Policy Trends For Innovative Project Delivery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emerging Policy Trends For Innovative Project Delivery Christopher D. LloydDBIA Water & Wastewater/Transportation Joint ProgramApril 21, 2010

  2. Presentation Overview • America’s Infrastructure Crisis • Historical Solutions • Public Policy Barriers and Opportunities • Emerging Statutory Frameworks • Recent Project Examples

  3. America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

  4. America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

  5. America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

  6. America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

  7. America’s Crumbling Infrastructure • Public complains but has no interest in increasing taxes/fees/tolls to pay for it • Politicians talk infrastructure, but it is always the first to item to go when money gets tight • Cost of maintaining existing infrastructure is eroding construction budgets • Failing infrastructure is harming US competitiveness

  8. Why Use Alternative Procurement? • Faster, better, cheaper (sometimes) • Single point of responsibility • Shift of risk away from public sector • Distances rate making/price setting decisions from the political sector • Lack of faith in the public sector

  9. Virginia in the Vanguard • Virginia PPTA (1995) and PPEA (2002) legislation seen as model statutes • Virginia has done 100+ deals • Range from $1.5 million - $5 billion+ • Provides fast track to design-build, predictable process

  10. PPEA: Process • Public entity solicits for proposals or accepts unsolicited proposals • Minimum of 45 day open competition period for unsolicited proposals • FOIA protections for confidential information are negotiated • Conceptual proposal outlines team qualifications, proposed cost, proposed scope and public benefits • Public entity may levy a proposal review fee on both solicited and unsolicited proposals • Proposal review fee is used to cover procurement costs

  11. PPEA: Process • All competing proposals are reviewed, followed by a downselect • Detailed proposals are requested – often relies on recommendations of outside/inside advisors • Detailed proposals start to lock in project scope, costs, schedule • Leads to an interim or comprehensive agreement with one firm • Significant requirements for public notification and hearings

  12. Evolution of Virginia’s PPEA • Creation of interim agreement concept • Increased public input and transparency • Development of “best practices criteria” • Creation of legislative oversight panel • Expansion to technology projects and services

  13. Creating the Ideal Procurement Law • Allows solicited and unsolicited proposals • Open to all financing vehicles • Ensures transparency and public participation • Fairly balances public and private risks • Provides for sufficient competition • Adequate public staffing to speed project approvals

  14. Barriers to Public Private Partnerships - 2010 • Stimulus promises diminished public sector appetite for creative approaches • CIP budgets were first cuts to meet government fiscal challenges • General distrust of Wall Street/corporate America • Public sector layoffs create staffing/evaluation challenges

  15. Support for Public Private Partnerships - 2010 • Stimulus “list making” exercise shows need for infrastructure • Lack of funding causing public sector to be more open to creative financing/development opportunities • Construction price declines/increased competition • Failure of other alternatives leaves few options • Appetite for “asset maximization”

  16. Recent Transactions (post-Lehman) • Several major players have exited the market (RBS, Babcock & Brown) • Several major deals faltered (Midway Airport, PA Turnpike) • Despite financial crisis, some deals are being done • Infrastructure funds are still successfully raising money • Era of cheap equity has ended (for now) • Market expects major public participation – risk aversion

  17. I-595 Florida • 10.5 mile, $1.8 billion project • Creates new express lanes, BRT • Financial close March 2009 • ACS Dragados as equity investor with bank consortium • $800 million bank debt, $600 million TIFIA, $232 million FDOT, $200 million equity • First “availability payment” scheme in US - $63.98 million per year for 30 years, FDOT controls toll revenue and rates • Additional information at http://www.i-595.com/default.aspx

  18. SPSA Waste to Energy • Sale of waste-to-energy plant to Wheelabrator/Waste Management • Provides for substantial rehabilitation to neglected facility • $150 million cash infusion lowers SPSA debt/tipping fees • Allocation of PAB’s lowers costs – merges public and private financing vehicles

  19. Recent Transactions – Market Reaction • Private sector looking for more legal certainty, traffic track record, public financial participation • Public sector looking for stronger parent guarantees, additional sweat equity, assistance in building public support for project • Increased interest in “social” infrastructure projects • Strong interest in energy-related infrastructure

  20. Future Opportunities and Issues • How will SAFETEA-LU reauthorization impact the development of new infrastructure? • Will the availability of new bond vehicles dampen desire for non-traditional financing? • How much flexibility will states/feds have to raise taxes to develop/maintain crumbling infrastructure? • Will governments be able to deliver on funding and matching commitments in a challenging fiscal environment? • Will new environmental/safety/labor requirements restrict infrastructure development?

  21. Infrastructure & Economic Development | Federal Public Affairs | Strategic Communications & Grassroots Mobilization State & Local Government Affairs | Emerging European Markets Atlanta • Charlotte • Charlottesville • Chicago • Columbia • Norfolk • Raleigh Springfield • Tyson’s Corner • Washington, D.C. | Bucharest, Romania www.mcguirewoodsconsulting.com

More Related