Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Publishing qualitative research issues and suggestions Albert Boonstra June 28th 2012. My perspective Most of my own research is qualitative. I study IS implementation processes in their context. Conducting qualitative research is difficult, but also challenging and relevant.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Most of my own research is qualitative. I study IS implementation processes in their context.Conducting qualitative research is difficult, but also challenging and relevant.
Associate editor of ISJ, a journal specialized in qualitative research (v. good category).
The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using any appropriate research method. The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers
Five common problems
Five comments from reviewers
Five suggestions for qualitative researchers
Some concerns and ideas
Aims at understanding real life situations
Suitable for the business and management domain,
where academic research is often criticized for its lack of relevance
Results do often catch attention because it describes and analyses a rich story
Seeking understanding by talking to people, focus on text. Engaged with people in real organizations
Based on the notion that knowledge is context dependent
Data are approached by questions such as:
-what is happening
-why is it happening
-how has it come to happen, and
-when did it happen
Includes a broad category of partially overlapping research types, including action research, case study research, ethnography, grounded theory
Qualitative research can be exploratory, explanatory, developing, validating or falsifying theories
TheoryStudy is notinformedbytheory, theoreticalcontribution is limited or the qualitative data are not well connectedwiththeory.
Method Strengths of qualitative research method are notutilized.
Research questions do notjustify a qualitative approach.
Research methodsection is notpreciseand vague.
WritingstyleWriting, especially the resultssection is messy, wordy, notorganizedaround research questionsand hard tocomprehend.
‘..The model is quite narrow, it is hard to build a bridge to the case study..
A mismatch between a clean model suitable for using quantitative methods, and the case study, which has a lot of potential richness..’ (MISQ)
Link between model and data. Variable model combined with qualitative approach
‘..The research method of this research seems to be content analysis, whereas typical case-studies tend to examine the context, process and relationships. In fact, most of the data analysis involves classifying narratives into the framework.. ‘ (JSIS)
Limited use of the strengths of a qualitative approach
‘..In fact, case study is just the right technique. It would be good to elaborate the time taken for the interviews, the type of questions asked, more details on the interviewees etc ..’ (ISJ)
More elaborated method section
‘..This criticism regards the description of the data. While the paper does provide some quantitative information about the dataset, more information about the "thickness" of the data (Geertz, 1973) is required..’ (EJIS)
Rich description of data
‘..In terms of discussion, I gather that the qualitative data is interpreted to provide strength to the argument developed. However, I am not able to find the argument arising from the data leading to the four groups presented later..’ (ISJ)
Weak link between data and contribution
2) JOURNAL AND CONTRIBUTION
Select a candidate journal at the start of the research project (plus a fall back option).
Study a few very good related qualitative research papers.
Think about candidate research questions and theoretical contribution right from the start.
Start writing, right from the start. Writing is thinking.
Develop your writing style. Be to the point, well structured, focused.
Tell a story to the reader, that develops from a motivation and a question to a conclusion in a logical way.
Remove unnecessary parts, which distract the reader from main line (baby-killing).
Research method section is important and not straightforward. Tell the readers what you did, but also why. Be as transparent as possible.
Present the data analysis/results in a structured fashion, close to the research questions. Reviewers dislike the messy presentation of results of many qualitative research papers.
Lack of adequate courses on qualitative research
Negative bias to qualitative research
Decreasing number of leaders of qualitative approaches
In our group we should embrace methodological pluralism
Collaboration of quantitative and qualitative researchers to produce mixed method papers
Qualitative researchers should collaborate and help each other to improve quality
DubéandParé (2003) Rigor in IS positivist case research. MISQ
Hennink, Hutter, Bailey, (2011) Qualitative Research Methods, Sage.
MilesandHuberman, (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage.
Wolcott, (2001) Writing up qualitative research, Sage.
Focus on writingandpublishingqualitative research.
Flyvbjerg (2006), Five misunderstandingsaboutcase-study research, QualitativeInquiry, 12(2): 219-245.