1 / 25

ECLAC WORK ON DISASTER EVALUATION

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUDGETARY QUESTIONS (ACABQ)’S VISIT TO ECLAC Santiago, Chile, 25-28 September 2006. ECLAC WORK ON DISASTER EVALUATION. Ricardo Zapata-Marti Regional Advisor, Focal Point for Disaster Evaluation.

fayola
Download Presentation

ECLAC WORK ON DISASTER EVALUATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUDGETARY QUESTIONS (ACABQ)’S VISIT TO ECLACSantiago, Chile, 25-28 September 2006 ECLAC WORK ON DISASTER EVALUATION Ricardo Zapata-Marti Regional Advisor, Focal Point for Disaster Evaluation Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) Santiago, Chile, September 2006

  2. Positive impact at the national level • Field missions coordinated by ECLAC staff incorporate relevant UN agencies in country team • Field missions are demand driven and generate synergy within government in post disaster recovery • Assessments are based on long-standing, well established methodology

  3. World-wide application and recognition boosted by incremental economic impact of disasters

  4. Positive nature of interdisciplinary tool • Coordinated, joint and cooperative work • Undertaken by the different sub regional and national offices of ECLAC, and • Multidisciplinary interdivisional composition of the missions • Involves knowledge transfer and advancement • Generates efficient resource allocation, technical and logistic synergies

  5. Capacity for multiple, simultaneous response • Given incremental and simultaneous occurrence of events • Possible multiple, simultaneous response • Proven by past experiences (Hurricane Mitch, 2004-2005 tropical storm seasons)

  6. Increase in efficiency • Reduce pressures on governments by not carrying several overlapping or non coordinated assessments, UN agency and other donors’ led assessments • Use of a single standardized, harmonized methodology provides tool both for cooperation mobilization and national strategic recovery frameworks • Given the positive past experience several UN agencies look forward for this ECLAC coordinated assessment and offer their support to it, including the financial institutions (such as the IDB, CAF, CABEI and CDB)   • MOUs agreed with several international players, concretely with IDB, UNDP/Haiti, UNDP/BCPR, WFP and UNICEF to do joint work • Coordinated development of analytical tools related to disaster damage and needs assessments and risk management and reduction, including IFIs and UN agencies

  7. Recognition from member governments • Evidenced both by request for such assessments (starting in 1972, and most recently in 2005 and 2006 in Central America and the  Caribbean for such events as hurricanes Emily, Stan and Wilma in several countries, • Ongoing assessment of floods in Suriname, • Request of training in the methodology, both • In the region (Belize, Jamaica, this year, which are normally funded by XB resources, such as UNDP, IDB, CAF, • Beyond the region under sponsorship of World Bank and, in some instances, the requesting country itself which will fund the mission study costs.

  8. Transcendence beyond the Latin American region • Namely in Southeast Asia, at the request of the World Bank • Inter-regional cooperation with ESCAP, in training, dissemination and customization and improvement of ECLAC methodological tool • Relevance of use in the 2004 December Indian Ocean Tsunami • Inclusion of the methodology as part of the World Bank's toolkit for disaster and risk management. • Participation in Kobe World Disaster Reduction Conference initiative of UN-wide International Recovery Platform • ECLAC will help develop the conceptual, technical methodological tools that link emergency needs to damage, losses and recovery needs assessments and strategies.   • Recognition of ECLAC's technical and practical expertise within the ISDR and by OCHA.

  9. HUMAN 100 - Health - Networks and safety - Networks and safety systems (security, systems (security, - Education solidarity) solidarity) - Extended family links - Extended family links 10 . Violence and security . Violence and security PHYSICAL SOCIAL Settlements and housing - Settlements and housing - infrastructure (transport and other) - infrastructure (transport and other) - 1 - Clean (drinking) water - Clean (drinking) water - Clean air - Clean air Biodiversity and integrity Biodiversity and integrity of ecosystems (micro of ecosystems (micro climatic impact climatic impact FINANCIAL NATURAL Credit access - Credit access - Land tenure and property legal protection - Land tenure and property legal protection - Past Current Mid-term Long term 17 Ricardo Zapata - Marti CEPAL - ECLAC Systemic, analytical tool relevant to global UN agenda, MDGs and Millennium Account

  10. Transcendence of the methodology beyond disaster assessment • Use in sustainability analysis and the potential impacts of climate change (IPCC IV) • Ongoing work with the WMO in illustrating economic value of meteorological services • Work with financial institutions in highlighting risk management financial instruments • Provide conceptual framework to assess disaster impact on achievement of poverty reduction programmes, disaster and crisis prevention and recovery, and attainment of MDGs

  11. Recognition by other stakeholders • By request of the major reinsurers that the ECLAC methodology provides a standardized tool that is useful for their risk analysis; • By academic/research institutions that include the data of ECLAC assessments in internationally recognized data bases on disaster's impact, such as the Louvain University OFDA-CRED database. • By NGOs, that see in methodology means of showcasing gender, social and other impacts

  12. How is ECLAC work perceived • How do member countries receive our technical cooperation (which in this field has always been demand-driven), • How we establish the interdisciplinary, interdivisional, interinstitutional teams both from the UN/international donor community side and clear identification of national relevant counterparts from the line ministries to the national planning, executive branches • How countries obtain benefits from assessments

  13. Mobilization of resources • Resource mobilization for the specific national reconstruction processes (by their presentation in donor conferences, special consultative groups of the banks, etc.) • In terms of policy changes at the national and international level.   Cases in point are • The IDB's disaster response policy that evolved based on joint ECLAC/IDB promotion of the concept that disasters are a development issue, after such watershed events as the 1998 hurricanes in the Caribbean (hurricane George in Dominican Republic) and Central America (hurricane Mitch) • The World Bank use for damage, loss and needs assessment after Gujarat earthquake in India, Indian Ocean tsunami, training of its technical and sector staff both in Headquarters and in the field • Preparation of distance learning tools by World Bank Institute

  14. A shared UN view on disaster risk: a conceptual contribution of ECLAC ECLAC´s contribution to understand the difference on how to face risk: • Living in it (passive approach) • Living with it (proactive management) ECLAC´s assessment tool makes it impossible is to ignore risk by • Quantifying it to decision makers. • Leading to policy changes in risk appropriation and its transfer and reduction. • Irs inclusion with other development goals and major strategies for poverty reduction.

  15. Where do we want to be: the road to be taken • Revert the myth on public goods: internalize damage and externalize benefits/profits • Further develop damage assessment tools to customize them and advance into areas not explored (cultural assets, further environmental impact and climate adaptation) • Train and empower users at the national and local level

  16. Reference materials: • ECLAC handbook for the socioeconomic and environmental impact of disasters (www.cepal.org/mexico, “desastres”) • Disasters and development (IADB/ECLAC publication, 2000 • Disaster assessments: 1973 to 2005 (www.cepal.org/mexico), “desastres”) • The 2004 Hurricanes in the Caribbean and the Tsunami in the Indian Ocean (ECLAC series (“Estudios y perspectivas) no.35 • WBI Distance Learning Courses: modules on damage and needs assessment (http://www.worldbank.org.ph/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/PHILIPPINESEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20236598~menuPK:488905~pagePK:1497618~piPK:217854~theSitePK:332982,00.html) • ESCAP / UNDP-BCPR project on the application of the ECLAC Methodology in Southeast Asia (http://www.unescap.org/index.asp, ti@unescap.org) Thanks for your attention

More Related