1 / 30

Achieving UHC in Nigeria: Options for Federal, State and LGAs

Achieving UHC in Nigeria: Options for Federal, State and LGAs. Professor Obinna Onwujekwe: MBBS, MSc, PhD (Health Economics) University of Nigeria, Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria. March, 2014. 1.0 Objectives. Objectives. Highlight key UHC indicators in Nigeria

fawzi
Download Presentation

Achieving UHC in Nigeria: Options for Federal, State and LGAs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Achieving UHC in Nigeria: Options for Federal, State and LGAs Professor Obinna Onwujekwe: MBBS, MSc, PhD (Health Economics) University of Nigeria, Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria March, 2014

  2. 1.0 Objectives

  3. Objectives • Highlight key UHC indicators in Nigeria • Share international experiences in UHC • Proffer options for Options for Federal, States and LGAs • Enumerate key action points for the implementation of UHC in Nigeria

  4. 2.0 Background

  5. Four target indicators proposed by WHO to M&E progress to achieving UHC… • Total health expenditure should be at least 4% - 5% of gross domestic product • Out-of-pocket spending should not exceed 30-40% of total health expenditure • Over 90% of the population is covered by pre-payment and risk pooling schemes • Close to 100% coverage of population with social assistance and safety-net programmes

  6. Is Nigeria on track to achieve UHC? • Total health expenditure was 6.7% of GDP in 2009 (more than the baseline of 4-5%) • Out-of-pocket spending is more than 60% of total health expenditure instead of the recommended 30-40% • Less than 5% the population is covered by pre-payment and risk pooling schemes instead of the recommended 90% • Less than 2% coverage of population with social assistance and safety-net programmes instead of the recommended 100%

  7. Nigeria is not on track to achieve UHC.. • High level of use of OOPS for healthcare • Minimal coverage with health insurance and other pre-payment mechanisms • States, LGAs and private sector unwilling to start mandatory health insurance scheme for their workers • Low level of access to healthcare services • Struggle to achieve MDGs

  8. 3.0 Key Points

  9. Constraining Factors to Adoption of the formal sector social health insurance programme (FSSHIP) [Onoka, Onwujekwe et al, 2012] • States should have their own insurance schemes/HMOs and have the fund circulate within the state. • It was unacceptable and inefficient the process of sending state contributions up to the NHIS, having the NHIS deduct 10% as administrative cost and having this money come back to the state again grossly reduced • Making health facilities work is more of a challenge than starting insurance and this should first be corrected • Concern about the governance and accountability system of the NHIS: lack of information to stakeholders at all levels about the activities of the scheme.

  10. International Experiences and Lessons for UHC in Nigeria • Moving towards UHC involves expansion of coverage in three ways (WHO, 2010) : • The breadth of coverage: the proportion of the population that enjoy social health protection • The depth of coverage: the range of essential services necessary to effectively address people’s health needs • The height of coverage: the portion of health-care costs covered through pooling and pre-payment mechanisms

  11. International lessons (McIntyre, 2011) • Mandatory pre-payment: Core of UHC systems • Out-of-pocket payments do not allow for financial protection – minimise their role • Voluntary pre-payment: “It is impossible to achieve universal coverage through insurance schemes when enrolment is voluntary” (World Health Report 2010) – Largely a complementary funding mechanism • Way to ensure the widest cross-subsidies possible

  12. Several common design features of UHC across countries (Giedion et al, 2013) • The coexistence of UHC schemes • Heterogeneity in design and organisation • Widespread effort to include the poor in the schemes • Prevalence of mixed financing sources (contributions plus taxes)

  13. African and developing countries moving towards UFC – Case Studies • Ghana • Has extended mandatory health insurance coverage to more than 50% of the Ghanaian population • RWANDA • About 90-95 percent of Rwandans in the informal sector are enrolled in health insurance and are accessing health care. • During 2005–2011, deliveries at health facilities increased by 78 percent, new curative consultations by 51 percent, and family planning users by 209 percent

  14. Case Studies (Cont’d) • Malaysia • Total Health Expenditure (4.8% of GDP) • Out-of-pocket expenditure as a % THE =30.7% • Comprehensive safety nets for vulnerable groups • Tax-based financing mechanism • South Africa • 40% mandatory health insurance; 40% voluntary pre-payment; 20% out-of-pocket

  15. Case Studies (Cont’d) • Thailand • Achieved Universal health coverage (100%): • Used a variety of pre-payment mechanisms (75% mandatory health insurance and 25% other pre-payment mechanisms) • The 30 Baht scheme

  16. 4.0 Implications and Relevance for Nigeria

  17. Options for Federal, States and LGAs - the innovative imperative Conceptual framework • Universal health coverage depends on: • Enabling policies, legislation, strategic plans, capacity, advocacy, perceptions • More health for money (improved efficiency) • More money for health (increased funding) • Innovative health financing • Improve Equity • Better health indices, achieve MDGs and other goals

  18. Implications and Relevance for Nigeria The Foundation “UHC can only be achieved when the health system is strong” - (WHO, 2010)

  19. Four international lessons with UHC (Giedion et al, 2013). • Affordabilityis important but may not be enough • Target the poor, but keep an eye on the non-poor • Benefits should be closely linked to target populations' needs • Highly focused interventions can be a useful initial step toward UHC

  20. Option 1: Mandatory Health Insurance • Mandatory health insurance for all federal, state and LGA public workers • Exists at the Federal level only • States and LGAs should start health insurance schemes for their workers • Workers must contribute a mutually agreed proportion of basic salary at all levels • Benefit package to be improved with increased contribution • Capitation payment to providers should be increased

  21. Option: Special Mandatory Health Insurance • Special mandatory health insurance for all children under 12 years and pregnant women • Start with children under five years and pregnant women • All nursery and primary school children should be enrolled (independent of their parents) • Funding from federal, state and LGA government budgets, special earmarked taxes and donors and other funding sources • Part funding from UBEC resources for school children

  22. Options 3: Free services • For high priority life-saving public health services through increased use of government revenue: • Immunization services • Prevention and treatment for HIV/AIDS • Prevention and treatment of tuberculosis (TB) • Prevention and treatment Malaria and some non-communicable diseases • Maternal, Neonatal and Child health services, especially antenatal, child birth and postnatal services

  23. Option 4: Community-based health insurance scheme for people • For people employed in the informal sector • For secondary and tertiary school students • Existing free programmes can be the core of CBHI scheme • Motivating all telecom and oil producing companies to enrol their catchment communities in health insurance schemes • Government subsidy using general tax revenue

  24. Option 5: Creating health safety nets for the poor and other vulnerable groups = equity funds • Harness the conditional cash transfers from SURE-P towards UHC • Funding from local and international organisations • Local earmarked taxes – proportion of VAT or some levy on tobacco, alcohol and airtime etc. • Develop and implement strategic plans for mainstreaming ‘Health in all Policies’ (HiAP) • Funding from Sovereign Wealth Fund (through social investments), interests from unclaimed dividends, NHIS investments, etc.

  25. Option 6: Private-sector involvement • Providing robust and enabling guidelines for the establishment and use of Private Voluntary Health Insurance • Certain categories of the informal sector • Formal private sector • Others

  26. 5.0 Recommended Actions

  27. Finally • Strive for more health for money (improved efficiency in use of available funds) • Develop cost strategic plans for achieving UHC in Nigeria: develop and cost 38 plans (for the Federal, 36 states and the FCT) • Continually generate and use evidence to improve the functioning of the UHC schemes in Nigeria • Information Education and Communication to the strategic decision makers, and to the general public

  28. 6.0 References

  29. References • AFHEA. Toward universal health coverage in Africa: Key issues. AfHEA 2nd Conference – 2011. Palm Beach Hotel, Saly – Sénégal: 15th - 17th March 2011 • CBHI Nigeria Brief rev UN CPG 052912 • Chua HT and Chah JCH (2012). Financing Universal coverage in Malaysia: a case study. BMC Public Health, 12(Suppl 1) S7:S7 • Di McIntyre. Conceptual issues related to universal coverage. AHPSR Proposal Development Workshop. Cape Town, 22 March, 2011. • More Health for the Money CPG rev UN 052912 • More Money for Health Nigeria Brief RG CPG rev UN 052912 • National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) 2007, Nigeria Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2007 Final Report. ABUJA NIGERIA. • National Bureau of Statistics (2006). • Obinna Onwujekwe & Benjamin Uzochukwu(2009). Benefit incidence analysis of priority public health services and financing incidence analysis of household payment for healthcare in Enugu and Anambra states, Nigeria. • Obinna Onwujekwe, Ogo Ezeoke, Felix Obi and Benjamin Uzochukwu (2011). Situation analysis of financial health risk protection: Nigeria. Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria and RESYST Consortium: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

  30. References • Onoka CA, Onwujekwe OE, Hanson K, Uzochukwu BS (2011). Examining catastrophic health expenditures at variable thresholds using household consumption expenditure diaries. Trop med int health doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02836 • National Bureau for Statistics (NBS), 2004. The 2004 National Living Standard Survey (NLSS). Abuja: NBS. • Obinna Onwujekwe & Edit Velenyi: Feasibility of private voluntary health insurance in Nigeria: valuation of benefits and equity assessment • National Population Commission and ICF Macro (2009): Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008. • WORLD HEALTH STATISTICS 2006

More Related