150 likes | 235 Views
Detailed assessment of AST3-2 telescope's performance in late Feb - early April, focusing on pointing, tracking, real-time data processing, and remote control amidst challenges like high dark levels and CCD temperature issues. Key findings on field rotation, imaging quality, and astrometric accuracy are discussed.
E N D
Ma Bin NAOC 2013.05.20 Tests of AST3-2 at Xinglong:Image Analysis
Tests of AST3-2 at Xinglong • Date: late Feb – early April • Tests:focusingpointing, trackingoperation & data systemauto-surveyreal-time pipeline & databaseremote control
High Dark Level • CCD TEC did NOT work well • t_CCD ~ t_air(~0℃) • dark: 100ADU/s (sky: 10ADU/s) • Pixel-to-pixel variance • Limiting depth!
Field Rotation • Alt-Az mount
Field Rotation 30 sec
Field Rotation Speed Limiting Exptime !
Focusing Steps: • Frames at diff. f • FWHM measurement • Fitting Influences: • Seeing • Unsteady due to movement
Pointing Correction • Tpoint:telescope axes .vs.alt-az
Pointing Time Neighbor field: 1.5 degree Firstly criterionRMS<2“, 40sec 0324 20sec, but elongated 0409RMS<1.5”, <15sec, unelongated
Astrometric Accuracy 0324 M35 1ses Scamp Ref cat: PPMX RMS ~ 0.15”
Limiting Mag • 0306 open cluster M44 10sec
Trail of Bright Star Frame transfer0.43sec 2640linesbright star -> trailhigh speed sampling
Trail of Bright Star Movement of the center when both tracking and untracking Cause: Seeing? Shake of the telescope?