1 / 10

Gauge Symmetry

Gauge Symmetry. Mr Finn Honors Physics March 2012. Electric Potential, V. Electric Potential V = QPE/q  QPE = QPE f - QPE i = QPE( ) - QPE(d) Define QPE()  0 QPE = kQq/d Choice of where QPE  0 is arbitrary This choice has NO physical implications

faunus
Download Presentation

Gauge Symmetry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gauge Symmetry Mr Finn Honors Physics March 2012

  2. Electric Potential, V • Electric Potential V = QPE/q • QPE = • QPEf - QPEi = QPE() - QPE(d) • Define QPE()  0 • QPE = kQq/d • Choice of where QPE  0 is arbitrary • This choice has NO physical implications • Electric field = -V/x depends on only differences, not values for V Recall V can be used to derive all relevant quantities.

  3. Symmetry • Observables remain constant after some “change” occurs • Types of symmetries • discrete • continuous • “Gauge” symmetry  V replaced by V+C • change in “scale” or C = continuous • global vs. local symmetry • misnomer! V = function is like a triangle Adding C is like rotating/reflecting a triangle Result is physically the same

  4. A C B C A B Triangles • Rotate equilateral triangle by 120° • vertices identical, labels irrelevant • physically original and rotated triangles are identical • Potential and new gauge • gauge irrelevant • fields, forces, changes in energy … all the same • physically V, V+C are identical

  5. Indirect Proof • Two fundamental principles • gauge symmetry of electric forces (GS): V = V + C • conservation of electric charge (CoQ) • GS  CoQ • Theory is that GS implies CoQ • Proof • Assume GS to be true • Assume CoQ to be false • Derive contradiction or that GS is false • GS cannot be both true and false • Premise that CoQ is false must be itself false and CoQ must be true • Recall: • GS = follows from Coulomb’s law • CoQ = empirically verified by Franklin • Problem: Are these “truths” related?

  6. destroy +1 nC of charge + + move charge create +1 nC of charge Assume we can Violate Conservation of Charge Create charge, move it, destroy it +60 V Equipotential lines +20 V Without also Violating Gauge Symmetry

  7. Energy • Create +1 nC • E1 = qV1 = (1nC)(20 J/C) = 20  10-9 J • Move charge • W = q V = (1 nC)(60-20) J/C = 40  10-9 J • Destroy +1 nC • E2 = -qV2 = -(1nC)(60 J/C) = - 60  10-9 J • negative = released, opposite of absorbed • Energy is conserved Ignore energy to create mass

  8. +160 V + + +120 V Contradiction • Add 100 V to all equipotential lines • Change “gauge” and nothing observable should be different • Energy still conserved • But energy to create charge changes! • This is observable • Violate GS • Assumed symmetry is broken

  9. Charge must be conserved • Otherwise, “gauge” (constant added to electric potential) can be measured • But gauge is irrelevant - only differences in electric potential are observable • Gauge symmetry  conservation of charge • Assuming energy is conserved Or: Gauge symmetry and charge conservation are logically connected  one implies the other.

  10. Conclusion • Mathematical structure of electrical interactions • their ability to be represented by scalar potential field V • which obeys a global gauge symmetry • Logically implies that the property that creates the interaction must itself be a conserved quantity • electric charge can be neither created nor destroyed

More Related