1 / 4

Faculty Review Process

Faculty Review Process. Revisions to the CALL Advancement to Above Scale Language – pg 14 Ad hoc procedures for advancement to Above Scale - pg 14 Delegation of review to Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Cut-off date for information requests will change to March 1 instead of March 31.

farren
Download Presentation

Faculty Review Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Faculty Review Process Revisions to the CALL • Advancement to Above Scale Language – pg 14 • Ad hoc procedures for advancement to Above Scale - pg 14 • Delegation of review to Vice Provost for Academic Personnel • Cut-off date for information requests will change to March 1 instead of March 31

  2. Faculty Review Process Future Changes Under Discussion • Service rewards • Distinguished Professor Title • TOP Criteria

  3. Faculty Review Process Possible Service Incentives • Absence of meaningful local service will count against file • Development of objective service evaluation criteria • UCAP Report will be analyzed by COVC • Service-driven merit • Campus pool for teaching relief • Campus faculty service award • O/S bonus for service

  4. Faculty Review Process Advice to Home Departments or Units • Explicitly indicate journal and publisher quality (e.g. impact factor) • Indicate preferred publication outlets • Document service thoroughly • Document publication roles consistently

More Related