1 / 3

Challenges and Concerns in FCC NBP Public Notice on Smart Grid

Bruce Kraemer from Marvell highlights concerns with FCC's Smart Grid public notice. Duplicate efforts, short response period, myriad of individual responses, and lack of harmonization mechanism raise questions. Issues with responses include constraints to standards, agreements with industry organizations like WiMAX, Zigbee, and WiFi, and definitions of key terms. Noteworthy discussions on performance and data rates.

Download Presentation

Challenges and Concerns in FCC NBP Public Notice on Smart Grid

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WG11 Comments on FCC NBP Public Notice #2 (Smart Grid) Authors: Slide 1 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  2. General Issues with NOI • FCC information request duplicates efforts already underway elsewhere e.g. • NIST • NTIA • FCC Response period is too short to generate comprehensive answers • FCC is requesting a myriad of individual responses • What will the FCC do with this information? • What is the mechanism harmonizing opinions? Slide 2 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  3. General Issues with Responses • Is the response constrained to 802 standards/amendments? • Are we agreeing to reference supplementary industry organizations e.g. • WiMAX, Zigbee, WiFi • Is there agreement on definition of key terms used? • E.g. Table 1: Does Performance = Data rate Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

More Related