1 / 13

Comparative Law Spring 2001 Class 38

Comparative Law Spring 2001 Class 38. Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April 21, 2002. Today’s Class. English Criminal Procedure. General Trends in English Criminal Procedure.

ezra-pace
Download Presentation

Comparative Law Spring 2001 Class 38

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparative Law Spring 2001Class 38 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer April 21, 2002

  2. Today’s Class • English Criminal Procedure

  3. General Trends in English Criminal Procedure • Greater focus on human rights, especially those rights in Art. 5 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights • Move toward less adversarial system toward more inquisitorial system • More and more work is heard by magistrates courts (97 per cent of criminal cases and 95 percent of sentencing)

  4. Which English Courts Try Criminal Cases?

  5. Which English Courts Try Criminal Cases? • Magistrates Courts • Crown Court

  6. Which English Courts Hear Criminal Appeals?

  7. Which English Courts Hear Criminal Appeals? • Crown Court (from Magistrates Court against conviction and/or sentence) • Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (from Magistrates Court on points of law, judicial review) • Court of Appeals (Criminal Division) (from Crown Court on points of law; requires leave) • House of Lords (from Court of Appeals on points of law of general public importance or leapfrog appeals from QBD; requires leave; very rare – about 6 per year)

  8. What Criminal Offenses are heard by magistrates courts?

  9. What Criminal Offenses are heard by magistrates courts? • Summary offenses such as traffic offenses • Since magistrates courts used to sit near police stations, the public tends to think of them as “police courts” • Offenses are heard by 2-3 lay magistrates or by 1 district judge. Magistrates rely on a clerk for advice on the law. • Magistrates can send an offender to prison for up to 6 months for one offense or up to12 for more than one offense and/or fine up to £5000. • No juries in magistrates courts

  10. What Criminal Offenses are heard by magistrates courts? • Also can hear offenses triable either way, which are medium serious offenses such as conspiracy, robbery, gbh • Here the defendant who pleads not guilty can elect trial in the magistrates court or the Crown Court unless magistrates insist on a Crown Court trial (or in some cases,where prosecutor does so). Most defendants opt for summary trial. • Magistrates can commit to a Crown Court for sentencing if they think their powers are inadequate

  11. What criminal offenses are heard by the Crown Court? • “indictable offenses”, which are the most serious crimes, including murder and rape. • “triable either way offenses” • Many of the judges are High Court judges who travel there “on circuit” and will try most serious offenses such as murder • Other judges, circuit judges, or part-time recorders, try less serious offenses such as conspiracy or grievous bodily harm or offenses released to them such as manslaughter or causing death by dangerous driving

  12. Crown Court Juries • If the defendant pleads not guilty, a jury of 12 sits with the judge or recorder • There is no option of trial by judge alone though Lord Justice Auld has recommended this in his 2001 report.

  13. Human Rights and Criminal Law • 1994 law that abolished bail for certain offenders (e.g. rape or murder) was found to violate the ECHR Art. 5 Why? • The law on bail has been challenged on this basis on many other ways and may require amendment in light of Art. 5 • Another change designed to speed cases through trial in magistrates courts is to give more judicial management powers to justices clerks

More Related