1 / 19

Municipal Waste Management in EU

Municipal Waste Management in EU. DG Environment European Commission. Municipal waste – definition and scope. No definition in legislation! Common sense definitions: waste generated by households and similar waste from other sources Waste collected by municipal services

ezra-daniel
Download Presentation

Municipal Waste Management in EU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Municipal Waste Management in EU DG Environment European Commission

  2. Municipal waste – definition and scope • No definition in legislation! • Common sense definitions: • waste generated by households and similar waste from other sources • Waste collected by municipal services • There is no specific legislation on municipal waste but they are addressed in several acts.

  3. Municipal waste – why cause problems • Diversified composition • Dispersed generation • Visible! • Problems with financing – how to apply producer pays principle?

  4. Municipal waste – environmental problems • Emissions from waste treatment (especially methane emissions from landfilling) • Wasting of resources • Problem no 1 – limiting the landfilling • Problem no 2 – increase recycling and recovery

  5. Diverting waste from landfills • Some Member States still rely heavily on landfilling e.g. Ireland, UK, Greece, Spain & EU-12 • High number of illegal landfills in the EU - negative impact on air, water, soil (e.g. methane, leachate) • A lot of biowaste is diverted from landfills – even more has to be done.

  6. Projected generation and landfilling of municipal waste in the EU-25 Source: EEA, 2007 Source: CEC, 2006. EEA Landfill Brochure.

  7. Structure of waste legislation Framework Legislation Horizontal Legislation Waste Stream Specific Legislation

  8. Waste Prevention and Recycling Strategy New Waste Framework Directive (WFD) 2008/98/EC Framework Legislation Waste Shipment Regulation (Reg. (EEC) 259/93 replaced by 1013/2006/EC) Supporting legislation: waste lists, reporting obligations etc. Hazardous Waste Directive Dir.91/689/EEC Waste Treatment Operations Incineration 2000/76/EC; to be replaced by new IPPC Landfill 1999/31/EC Recyclingsee new WFD Biological treatmentno legislation yet Waste Streams Waste oils 75/439/EEC Titanium Dioxide 78/176/EEC Sewage Sludge 86/278/EEC Batteries and Accumulators 91/157/EEC replaced by 2006/66/EC Packaging and Packaging Waste 94/62/EC PCBs 96/59/EC End-of-life Vehicles 2000/53 EC Waste electric and electronic equipment WEEE 2002/96/EC Restriction of Hazardous Substances RoHS Dir.2002/95/EC Mining Waste 2006/21/EC repealed by new WFD To be replaced by new IPPC Up-date in 2010-11

  9. Some targets in waste legislation

  10. Landfill directive – distance to targets:Biodegradable waste landfilled in 2003 compared to generation in 1996 Source: CEC, 2006. EEA Landfill Brochure.

  11. Municipal waste composition – examples

  12. Municipal waste generation [kg/capita]

  13. Recycling, incineration and landfilling of MSW Source: EEA, 2007.

  14. Treatment techniques used • Generally waste hierarchy applies – usually recycling is the best • No single best technology for municipal waste treatment – except landfilling as singe WORST technology • E.g. in comparisons between incineration and biological treatment life cycle approach suggests some of the key factors as follows: • Amount of energy recovered by incineration • Type of energy replaced by incineration • Local market for compost and what type of products replaced by compost (peat, fertilizers) • Promising results of anaerobic digestion – delivering renewable energy as biogas and still digestate can be further used on soil

  15. Economic issues • The capital and operating costs of MSW management and biological treatment of waste depend on multiple factors and vary regionally and locally – so there is close to impossible to have general data or make comparisons • In the study for European Commission the following financial cost estimates of management of bio-waste were proposed as assumptions representative for the EU-15 (2002): • Separate collection of bio-waste followed by composting: 35 to 75 €/tonne; • Separate collection of bio-waste followed by anaerobic digestion: 80 to125 €/tonne; • Landfill of mixed waste: 55 €/tonne; • Incineration of mixed waste: 90 €/tonne. • the additional costs of separate collection at 0-15 €/tonne

  16. Health issues • Very limited epidemiological data • UK study for DEFRA suggests very limited or no impact on health • DEFRA 2004, Review of environmental and health effects of waste management: municipal solid waste and similar wastes (DEFRA, May 2004); http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/waste/research/health/index.htm

  17. Green Paper on bio-waste • Published 3rd of December • First step in the assessment for the potential proposal on the new legislation • May be used as base for further reading (many references) • For more info visit: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/compost/index.htm

  18. Thank you for your attention! http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/index.htm European Commission – DG ENV.G.4 Sustainable Consumption and Production Avenue de Beaulieu 5, B-1160 Brussels

More Related