1 / 104

Classical Lamination Theory W.rangsri

Definition of Composite Materials Fibers and Matrix Phases Composite Composition and Properties Manufacturing Processes Applications. Classical Lamination Theory W.rangsri. Intro. to Mechanics of Laminated Composite Materials Introduction to Composite Materials. Contents.

eydie
Download Presentation

Classical Lamination Theory W.rangsri

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Definition of Composite Materials Fibers and Matrix Phases Composite Composition and Properties Manufacturing Processes Applications Classical Lamination TheoryW.rangsri Intro. to Mechanics of Laminated Composite Materials Introduction to Composite Materials

  2. Contents • The Kirchhoff Hypothesis • Laminate Nomenclature • LaminateStrains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis • LaminateStrains • Laminate Stresses • Stress Distributions through the Thickness • Force and Moment Resultants • LaminateStiffness Matrix • LaminateStiffness: The ABD Matrix • Classification of Laminates • ElasticCouplings

  3. Introduction

  4. Introduction • Understand • how laminatesresponse to load • how the fiber angles of the individuallayers influence laminateresponse • how the stacking arrangement of the layers influences the response • how changingmaterialproperties in a group of layers changes response • how the stresses are influenced by theseparameters

  5. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Nomenclature

  6. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Nomenclature

  7. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis • 1800s by Kirchoff • Greatlysimplifiedanalysis (accuratelypredict the response of beams, plate, and shells) • Hypothesisapply to other structures

  8. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis M: Applied moments q: Distributedappliedloads N: Inplaneloads P: Point loads Laminateis flat. All layer are perfectlybondedtogether.

  9. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Kirchoffhypothesis assumes thatline AA’ remainsstraightand normalto the deformedgeometricmidplane and does not change length.

  10. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Kirchoffhypothesis assumes thatline AA’ remainsstraight and normal to the deformedgeometricmidplane and does not change length.

  11. : Rotation of ref. surface about y The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis z-x plane u°: Translation of point P° in x direction w°: Translation of point P° in z direction

  12. : Rotation of ref. surface about x The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis y-z plane v°: Translation of point P° in y direction w°: Translation of point P° in z direction

  13. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains and Displacements: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis

  14. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains (small deformations, small dispalcements) Tensor shear strain = curvature of the ref. surface = inverse of the radius of curvature

  15. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains (small deformations, small dispalcements)

  16. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains (small deformations, small dispalcements)

  17. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains (small deformations, small dispalcements)

  18. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Strains (small deformations, small dispalcements) A small segment of a four-layer laminate (0.6 mm thick) deformed such that at a point P0 on the reference surface the extensional strain in the x direction is 1000 x 10^-6. The radius of curvature R0, of the reference surface, is 0.2 m.

  19. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Laminate Stresses • CLT => each point within the vol. of a laminateis in a state of plane stress. • the stresses varywith z • the strainsvarywith z • reducedstiffnessesvarywith z

  20. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  21. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  22. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  23. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  24. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90° 90°

  25. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0°

  26. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 90°

  27. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  28. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness aluminum

  29. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  30. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0°

  31. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 90°

  32. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  33. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0°

  34. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 90°

  35. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  36. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  37. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  38. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  39. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  40. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  41. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness

  42. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  43. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness 0° 90°

  44. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Stress Distributions through the Thickness aluminum

  45. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Force and Moment Resultants

  46. The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Force and Moment Resultants

  47. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Force and Moment Resultants

  48. CLT Example 1 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Force and Moment Resultants

  49. CLT Example 2 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Force and Moment Resultants

  50. CLT Example 2 [0/90]S graphite-epoxy laminate (0.6 mm) subjectedto known The Kirchhoff Hypothesis Force and Moment Resultants

More Related