1 / 30

Branko Bijeljic, Weng-Hong Chong , Oussama G harbi Stefan Iglauer a nd Martin Blunt

Reactive Transport in Acidization and CO 2 Sequestration : An Experimental Investigation of Calcite Dissolution in Brine . Branko Bijeljic, Weng-Hong Chong , Oussama G harbi Stefan Iglauer a nd Martin Blunt. Introduction: CO 2 and Global Warming.

ewan
Download Presentation

Branko Bijeljic, Weng-Hong Chong , Oussama G harbi Stefan Iglauer a nd Martin Blunt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reactive Transport in Acidization andCO2Sequestration :An Experimental Investigation of Calcite Dissolution in Brine Branko Bijeljic, Weng-Hong Chong, Oussama Gharbi Stefan Iglauer and Martin Blunt

  2. Introduction: CO2 and Global Warming • Increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) has profound effects on global warming • CO2 is the most important anthropogenic GHG • CO2 from burning fossil fuel has effective lifetime of tens of thousand years (Archer,2005) 77% of total GHG emissions Figure: Global anthropogenic GHG emissions (IPCC, 2007)

  3. Introduction: CCS and Storage Security • Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is the key emerging technology for anthropogenic GHG mitigation • CCS involves capturing of CO2 and storing it away from the atmosphere for a very long time (IPCC, 2005) • CO2 disposal in deep geological formations is the best option currently available (Bachu, 2000) • CO2 can be stored underground via physical and/or geochemical trapping • Geochemical trapping provides higher trapping security over time Figure: Trapping mechanisms and change of storage security over time (IPCC, 2005)

  4. Introduction: Acidization • Increase productivity: • force acid into a carbonate • or sandstone in order to • increase Kand e by • dissolving rock constituents. Dissolution patterns in carbonate acidizing (Freddand Fogler, 1999) Flowrate increases from 0.04cm3/min (a) to 60cm3/min (e)

  5. Problem Definition: Importance of Calcite Dissolution • Carbonate minerals are plentiful in sedimentary rocks and modern sediment (Morse et al, 2002) • 60% of known petroleum reserves are located in carbonate reservoirs (Morse et al, 1990) • High potential as CO2 sink • Carbonate high reactivity may lead to changes in porosity, permeability and storage capacity during CO2 injection • There is a need to establish good understanding of mineral dissolution/precipitation for geological and reservoir model to simulate CO2 movement and trapping (SPE ATW on CO2 sequestration, 2006)

  6. Problem Definition: Calcite Dissolution in Brine • Calcite behavior in highly saline solutions unclear • Extensive work only in dilute solutions and seawater • Acidity plays a key role in mineral dissolution • pH of solution in contact with mineral surface is the major controlling factor of dissolution (Golubevet al, 2005) • 1-2 pH units decrease was observed in brine reacted with supercritical CO2 which will affect chemical equilibria of the system (Kazsubaet al, 2003) • Will precipitation take place post dissolution? • Few precipitation experiments were performed by other researchers • Supersaturation does occur in natural water system e.g. lower Colorado River (USA) (Suarez, 1983)

  7. Research Objectives To understand calcite dissolution in highly saline brine (5% NaCl+1%KCl) To delineate effects of acidity, temperature and surface area on calcite dissolution To investigate the coupled dynamics of calcite dissolution/precipitation and flow though porous medium

  8. Sample Description: Rock and Synthetic Brine • Guiting and Cotswold Limestones were used • Brine is made up of analytical reagent grade NaCl (5%) and KCl (1%) salt in 18.2 MΩ pure water • Analytical grade HCl with specific gravity 1.18 is added when required

  9. Batch Experiments: Experimental Procedure Basic Batch Reactor: Thermometer pH meter Fluid sampling point Acidic Brine- Carbonate Mixture Magnet Magnetic stirrer and hot plate Figure: Basic Batch Reactor Apparatus

  10. Batch Experiments: HCl-Brine-Carbonate Results Effect of Temperature: Effect of Acidity: • The lower the initial solution pH, the more Ca2+ is leached from the carbonate. • The amount of dissolved Ca2+ tends to level off to 25ppm when pH is increased. • Dissolved Ca2+ concentration shows NO appreciable change with temperature change for all solutions with different initial pH

  11. Batch Experiments: HCl-Brine-Carbonate Results Effect of Surface Area: • Grains with less surface area has less dissolved Ca2+ than grains with larger surface area • The smaller are the particles, the more exposed corners and edges where ions escape are available. • Ratio of • is not constant indicates that reaction surface area is NOT equal to total surface area.

  12. Batch Experiments: Experimental Procedure • Batch Reactor with CO2 Injection : Flow Control Valve Injection tubing Flow meter Compressed CO2 Basic Batch Reactor Magnetic stirrer and hot plate Figure: Batch reactor with CO2 injection system

  13. Batch Experiments: CO2-Brine-Carbonate Results Effect of Surface Area: Effect of Acidity: pH [Ca2+] • Brine saturated with CO2 formed carbonic acid of pH ~4. • pH and dissolved Ca2+ concentration stabilized rapidly (~20min). • Indicateshigh carbonate reactivity towards acidic solutions. • More Ca2+ is dissolved with increasing surface area.

  14. Batch Experiments: CO2-Brine-Carbonate Results Effect of Temperature: • Initial pH of the solution increases with increasing temperature • This is due to CO2 gas being less soluble at higher temperature. • Subsequently, less dissolved Ca2+ with increasing temperature. pH [Ca2+]

  15. Batch Experiments: Comparisons Effect of Surface Area Effect of Temperature Effect of Acidity • Dissolved Ca2+ stabilized later in CO2-equilibrated brine due to dissolution mechanism differences • CO2 transformation into H2CO3 is the rate-limiting step • Dissolved Ca2+ in HCl-brine is more insensitive to temperature • Dissolution in CO2-brine strongly influenced by temperature-dependent CO2 solubility • Increasing dissolved Ca2+ concentration with increasing surface area is observed for both mixtures

  16. Column Experiments: Experimental Procedure End caps + wire mesh + filter papers Back pressure valve Effluent Pump Carbonate pack Flow controller Solution Pressure transducers

  17. Column Experiments: Results • Dissolved Ca2+ concentration increases along the column but gradually flattens towards the outlet. • Significant increase of pH near the inlet but gradual decrease towards the outlet

  18. Column Experiments: Calcite Dissolution Assuming the CO2 formed from calcite dissolution forms carbonic acid, the overall reaction is [H+]1> [H+]2> [H+]3 Scenario 1: Calcite Dissolution Dissolution 1> Dissolution 2> Dissolution 3 [Ca2+]1< [Ca2+]1+2< [Ca2+]1+2+3 High H+ Low Ca2+ [H+]1 [H+]2 [H+]3 Dissolution 3 Dissolution 1 Dissolution 2 [Ca2+]1 [Ca2+]1+2+3 Acid Injection Point [Ca2+]1+2 Section 3 Section 2 Section 1

  19. Column Experiments: H+ Formation Assuming the CO2 formed from calcite dissolution forms carbonic acid, the overall reaction is pH1> pH2> pH3 [H+]1< [H+]2< [H+]3 Scenario 2: H+ Formation Scenario 1: Calcite Dissolution Formation 1< Formation 2< Formation 3 [Ca2+]1< [Ca2+]1+2< [Ca2+]1+2+3 High H+ Low Ca2+ [H+]1 [H+]2 [H+]3 Formation1 Formation 3 Formation 2 [Ca2+]1 [Ca2+]1+2+3 [Ca2+]1+2 [Ca2+]1 [Ca2+]1+2+3 Acid Injection Point [Ca2+]1+2 Section 3 Section 2 Section 1

  20. Conclusions • Dissolution increases with increasing acidity but tends to stabilize at circumneutral pH • The temperature range under investigation (25-60ºC) shows a weak effect on dissolution • An increase in total surface area increases the dissolution • The acidity of solution has more impact on dissolution than surface area and temperature • For the column experiment, most significant dissolution occurs near the inlet and the least near the outlet • pH values increase dramatically near the column inlet due to high dissolution. The gradual decrease in pH along the column is due to the backward reaction (i.e. formation of H+) is favoured.

  21. Recommendations • Dissolution experiments using actual formation brine. • Dissolution experiments with other types of sedimentary carbonate rocks, e.g. aragonite, dolomite. • Column experiments with different injected fluid pH, flow rate, grain sizes, rock type and residence time. • Column experiments with carbonate pack with residual oil saturation, Sor. • Coreflooding experiment at high pressure elevated temperature conditions. • Pore scale CT scan experiments on acidization • Modeling advection/diffusion/reaction and with CTRW based direct/network simulation

  22. MEAN FLOW DIRECTION X • Pore-scale CT experiments & simulation Geologically equivalent network Micro-CT images

  23. Back Up

  24. Synthetic Brine Description

  25. Apparent Dissolution Rate, R • To obtain the apparent dissolution rate, R of the reactive system., • Change of Ca2+ concentration in solution against time was plotted to obtain the derivative of concentration-time. • The time derivative of Ca2+ concentration was then corrected for • solution volume, V • carbonate total surface area, A

  26. Apparent Solubility Product, Ksp For calcite dissolution in HCl system, we have Assume CO2 formed forms carbonic acid, the overall reaction is Therefore, calcite apparent solubility product is Since [Ca2+] = [HCO3-], we have

  27. Apparent Solubility Product, Ksp For calcite dissolution in carbonic acid system, we have Therefore, calcite apparent solubility product is Since 2[Ca2+] = [HCO3-] and [H2CO3] = [H+], we have

  28. Effects of Acidity HCl-Brine-Carbonate Mixture Comparisons

  29. Effects of Temperature CO2-Brine-Carbonate Mixture HCl-Brine-Carbonate Mixture

  30. Effects of Surface Area CO2-Brine-Carbonate Mixture HCl-Brine-Carbonate Mixture

More Related