1 / 22

360˚ Evaluation

360˚ Evaluation. A new era of comprehensive review Written by: the ACGME. The concept of 360: a full spectrum of evaluation. Our Patients Nurses Colleagues (Peer) Faculty. Why do we have to do this?. Formative Evaluation The program must:

eve-willis
Download Presentation

360˚ Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 360˚ Evaluation A new era of comprehensive review Written by: the ACGME

  2. The concept of 360: a full spectrum of evaluation • Our Patients • Nurses • Colleagues (Peer) • Faculty

  3. Why do we have to do this? Formative Evaluation The program must: V.A.1.b). (1) provide objective assessments of competence in patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice;

  4. ACGME: core competencies • Patient Care is the compassionate, appropriate, and effective treatment of health problems • Medical Knowledge about established and evolving biomedical, clinical, and cognate sciences • Practice-Based Learning and improvement that involves investigation and evaluation of their own patient care and assimilation of scientific evidence in patient care. • Interpersonal and Communication Skillsthat result in effective information exchange • Professionalism as manifested through a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities • Systems-Based Practice as manifested by actions that demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care

  5. Why do we have to do this? • V.A.1.b).(2) use multiple evaluators (e.g., faculty, peers, patients, self, and other professional staff); Common Program Requirements 9 by ACGME

  6. Patient 360˚ Evaluation • A minimum of 10 evaluations per year • Self-distribution to clinic patients at the end of the clinic visit • “Anonymous” • The patient returns the survey to the front desk along with check out sheet • Paper

  7. Nurse 360˚ Evaluation • A minimum of 10 per year • “Anonymous” • Electronic ISD survey • Distributed monthly by Nurse Managers • Evaluating night float, ward residents and interns in close proximity to nurses station • Wake Med nurses possibly included

  8. Peer 360 Evaluation • A minimum of 10 per year • Evalue • Your colleagues will be assigned to you • Encouraged to submit “on the fly” evals • ACGME core competencies

  9. Peer 360 Evaluations • Respects staff and peers • Works as a team player • Is prompt and present for rounds and sign out • Promptly return pages and emails • Shows respect and empathy to patients and families • Keep current and effective communication to main aspects of patient care • Maintains a positive and supportive attitude

  10. Thank you for your attention

  11. Evalue • RRC Rules • 80h work week over 4 week average • 1 day off in 4 over 4 week average • 10h between shifts • 24+6 call cycle

  12. Log Accurately • If you worked >30h, we want to know about it • If you had <10h off between shifts, we want to know about it • At same time • You should structure your call to prioritize these mandates • You should sign-out procedures, labs, and other outstanding issues • This fits into the ‘team approach’ to inpatient care

  13. E-Value Mistakes • Always tell us your shift • Lunches are part of your work hours • Pay attention to AM/PM, start/end dates for overnight inpatient duties • In ED, chart your patients as your shift is coming to a close, staying after can break the <10h rule

  14. E-Value Demonstration

  15. Med U and Med W Teaching • Each Tuesday at 1:15 in 8 BT Conference Room • Residents, Interns, Students expected to attend

  16. Admissions Protocol

  17. Our Priorities for Admissions • The Patient takes all priority • On-call interns meet their admissions cap • Patient are admitted to appropriate services • All services are ‘general medicie’ first, specialty second • This usually is not an issue • Team equity and fairness amongst teams

  18. Friday and Saturday Nights • Hard intern on-call cap at 11pm • If 5 day admissions are not reached by 11pm, that team will not cap for the day • Non specialty patients might be assigned to a specialty service • Pre-Call Floats begin once on-call cap has completed • We want our interns to have more opportunities to go independently complete the admissions process

  19. Sunday – Thursday Nights • No hard 11pm cap • Admissions and patient placement returns to our priorities • If all on-call teams will cap, patients admitted early in the night [e.g. 8pm] can be floated to the next team; patients admitted in the middle of the night [e.g. 2am] can go to the on-call team • Night Floats should not modify/reassign the now post-call assignments after any team member could have woken and reviewed WebCIS from home.

  20. During the Day • Fact: some teams cap earlier than others • Fact: most residents also function as a mini-MAO for their team or beyond • Fact: no one likes doing this; particularly if you are trying to find a spot for our patient • On-call residents together work as a team of MAOs • If patients are called for admission from ED or arrive to floor to direct admit, they take priority over any other ‘potential’ patient. • Do not ‘save spots’ • Please let us help you if resident/attending tension arises

  21. 2010-2011 Education Committee Members • R4: Andrew Smitherman • R3: Lindsay Kruska, Nicole Tintera • R2: Ed Barnes, John Rommel • Interns: soon-ish

More Related