70 likes | 154 Views
Consultant report highlights issues like protests, delays, and inefficiencies. Recommendations stress uniformity in purchasing policies and procedures, centralizing development, addressing organizational efficiencies, and promoting legislative changes.
E N D
New Directions for California State Procurement Jack Friery, Esq.
Consultant Report to California DGS • Perceived problems: • Increased protests • Delayed projects • Inefficient workflow • DGS issued contract to consultant • Result: Review and Analysis ofUniform Purchasing Practices (Aug 03)
Summary of Report • Calls for uniformity in state purchasing procedures for • Goods • Services • IT/Telecommunications
Summary (con’t) • Centralize development of purchasing policy (but not major code reform) • Develop uniform purchasing procedures (avoid customized and arbitrary approaches) • DGS declare the State Contracting manual as the single purchasing manual
Summary (con’t) • Address organizational efficiencies (DGS should create dedicated policy & procedures office) • Initiate legislative changes • All procurement through DGS • Add incentive contracting for goods, services, & IT • Clarify OCI
Summary (con’t) • Address individual purchasing issues • Standardized contract models (RFP/IFB/CMAS) • Policies for performance specs • Simplify reviews and approvals • Simplify delegations • Capture lessons learned
ABA Involvement • Input to consultant’s analysis & reviewed draft • Recommended ABA Model Procurement Code • Commenting on consultant’s final report through ad hoc committee (ongoing) • Effect of new Administration?