1 / 60

Lithuanian E-Government Assessment

December 2000. Lithuanian E-Government Assessment. Agenda. E-Government Strategies What have we done in Lithuania Assessment Action Plan. E-Government Strategies. Key Objectives.

eunice
Download Presentation

Lithuanian E-Government Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. December 2000 LithuanianE-Government Assessment

  2. Agenda • E-Government Strategies • What have we done in Lithuania • Assessment Action Plan

  3. E-GovernmentStrategies

  4. Key Objectives • The E-Government Project will enable services to be comparable with the best services available from the private sector in terms of quality,accuracy, timeliness and user-friendliness • Government administration should provide the best possible service for citizens and companies • Simpler, faster and more flexible processes and flows

  5. IT in Traditional Government To support the government by providing high quality, information services

  6. IT in E-Government To conduct and support the government by providing high quality, competitive and targeted Information Services

  7. The E-Model Extends Government Suppliers Citizens /Commercial Government “Going E”

  8. UK E-Government TargetsElectronic Service Delivery • By 2002 the government intends as a minimum that citizens will be able to: • Apply for training loans, student support and use the National Grid for Learning • Look for work and be matched to jobs • Get health information and advice • Get information about benefits • Fill in and send tax returns • Book driving tests • And businesses will be able to: • File returns at Companies House • Complete VAT registration forms and make VAT returns • Apply for regional support grants • Receive payments from government for the supply of goods and services.

  9. Government Strengths Supply (Electronic Government services) ‘Front office’ Demand (Consultation with citizens and businesses) • Singapore • UK • USA • Australia • Canada • France • USA Change (Commitment & drivers of change) Capability (Enabling Government infrastructure) ‘Back office’ • Australia • UK • Finland • Netherlands • Singapore • Sweden

  10. Stages of Development E-Government: A phased approach... Multi- CONVERGENCE Jurisdictional SERVICE TIER THREE Seamless Government TRANSFORMATION Inter- Departmental CHANNEL TIER TWO REFINEMENT Fully-Enabled Intra- ESD TIER ONE departmental On-Line Presence Single Business Line Information Initiation Interaction Integration

  11. Stages of Development Website presence, which provides general information and on-line forms Stage 1 The ability to undertake database queries and complete forms on-line Stage 2 Agency interaction with clients, including client entry of confidential data Stage 3 Agencies receiving authenticated information Stage 4 share data with other agencies with approval of individual clients (where appropriate)

  12. What have we done in Lithuania

  13. E-Government Assessment The assessment was conducted between July and September 2000 and covered over thirty ministries and departments, state companies, twelve selected municipalities and the counties

  14. Assessment Topics • IT Infrastructure • Integration • Security • Projects • Organisation

  15. Assessment Tools

  16. IT Infrastructure / Information Flows

  17. IT Infrastructure

  18. Information flows

  19. Information flows

  20. Findings • No strategic plan to build the governmental infrastructure • Insufficient standardisation • Build up is according to departmental standards and not according to a governmental model • High level of investment necessary • Lack of available funding • Insufficient access to key skills

  21. Integration

  22. Approach • Information flows were analysed based on the following criteria: • Timeliness and Accuracy • Importance • Suitability • Required Level of Integration

  23. Findings • No strategic plan to build the governmental Infrastructure • Insufficient standardisation • Build up is according to departmental standards and not according to a governmental model • High level of investment necessary • Lack of available funding • Insufficient access to key skills

  24. Integration Process

  25. Security

  26. Assessment Approach • Security Assessment Questionnaire • Compliance against the de facto Security Management Standard (BS7799) • Interviews • Business Impact Analysis

  27. E-Government Drivers • Electronic services must be conducted SAFELY • Citizens need to TRUST E-Government services SECURITY IS CRITICAL FOR E-GOVERNMENT

  28. Security Assessment Example

  29. Assessment Score Card

  30. Findings • Poor security across the government agencies • Lack of resources and limited experience • No government security standards • No assignment of responsibility for security • No central advisory and accreditation agency

  31. Projects

  32. Projects Assessment Approach • Overview of projects per department • Critical review of projects based on: • their importance for the Government of Lithuania • the business logic behind them • project management methodologies used • Review of departmental / governmental project organisation and co-ordination • Recommendations package (model) for future project planning, management and control

  33. Project Management Evaluation

  34. Project Management Performance

  35. Project Management Findings • Little or no strategic planning and co-ordination of projects • Projects defined without reviewing possible synergies and overlap in areas of common need • Project evaluation, prioritisation and authorisation often focuses only on the department concerned • Very limited and often poor cost / benefit analysis

  36. Project Management Findings (2) • Weak project management and control culture • Low levels of financial and operational project control • Task scheduling / critical interdependencies often unclear • Inadequate status and cost reporting / control • No overall milestone control methodology

  37. Organisation

  38. Organisation Analysis • The organisation analysis was based on the following topics: • Importance of information technology to the business of an institution • Requirements for centralisation or decentralisation

  39. Organisation Analysis

  40. Organisation Findings • Due to low salaries specialists are leaving to the private sector • No or only limited pooling of key IT skills • Inefficient use of departmental IT resources • Project and financial planning is not linked • IT departments are not consulted / involved in business decisions • No central financial and project control

  41. Organisation Findings (2) • Departmental interests are seen as more important than strategic governmental plans • No central body for strategic IT planing • Global consequences of legal and organisational decrees are not always considered

  42. E-Government Model

  43. E-Government Model

  44. Implementation Phases Phase 0: Create Single Entry Point Phase 1: Build the Foundations - Initiate the Intranet and a common messaging system - Centralised web hosting and consistent look and feel Phase 2: Content Development - Further development of the Intranet (data communication) - Dynamic website content, based on replicated data Phase 3: Interactive Government - Fully operational ”component based" government applications - Interactive government website

  45. Phase 1Create Single Entry PointDuration: 3 months • Decide portal name and hosting location • Develop inter-government links • Define Intranet and Internet strategy • Design Organizational structure • Develop Information Security, IT Infrastructure, and Integration Strategy

  46. Phase 2Build the FoundationDuration: 8 months • Lauch the Intranet • Begin integrating inter-government web sites • Implement the new organisational structure • Initiate Security project • Integrate key objects

  47. Phase 3Content DevelopmentDuration: 6 months • Develop dynamic web-site content • Begin Security roll-out to other Ministries • Start the Integration roll-out • Develop applications for key areas • Web enable key areas e.g. Tax, Customs • Major infrastructure development will be completed

  48. Phase 4Interactive GovernmentDuration: 12 months • Completion of interactive Intranet and Internet • Security to be completed to 90 % (standards and tool set) • Integration to be completed at smaller registries • Infrastructure development to be extended to non- strategic areas

  49. Action Plan for Lithuania

More Related