1 / 31

Process of Technology Change:

Ch. 4. Process of Technology Change:. Diffusion. What is diffusion?. The original word diffusion can be traced to Latin “ diffundere ,” which meant “to put out.” In ordinary English language, to diffuse means to spread in all directions .

eris
Download Presentation

Process of Technology Change:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ch. 4 Process of Technology Change: Diffusion

  2. What is diffusion? • The original word diffusion can be traced to Latin “diffundere,” which meant “to put out.” • In ordinary English language, to diffuse means to spread in all directions. • Diffusion is the process by which an innovation is propagated through certain channels over time among the units of a system.

  3. There are 3 major element • Innovation. From the point of view of a customer, a technical solution is considered to be an innovation when it is new or perceived as new by the individual or the unit of adoption. • Propagation. Refer to the spread of an innovation beyond its inventor. • Time. The time dimension is involved in diffusion, because it takes time for individuals or firms to decide to adopt an innovation. • System. Is a set of interlinked units that participate in the diffusion process.

  4. The adoption speed • Indeed, many innovations fail because they do not get adopted altogether. • When successful, an innovation gets adopted over a period of time: • Different types of users adopt the innovation at different times. • The late adopters sometimes look to the earlier ones for information when trying to decide whether the innovation will be useful to them.

  5. TECHNOLOGY Diffusion MARKET TECHNOLOGY-MARKET (T-M) MATRIX

  6. DIFFUSION DYNAMIC

  7. 3 MAJOR CHARACTERSTIC OF THE DYNAMICS OF DIFFUSION (1) S-curve of diffusion, (2) reinvention during diffusion, (3) mechanism of diffusion.

  8. Number of Customers Cumulative number of adoption Frequency of adoption Time S-CURVE OF DIFFUSION

  9. Number of Customers Increasing diffusion speed Time PERBEDAAN DAN KECEPATAN DIFUSI

  10. Reinvension • Reinvention refer to the dynamic by which an innovation is changed or modified by the users as they adopt and use it.

  11. 4 ways in which reinvention occurs during diffusion • The increasing use of an innovation often hinges upon improvement in its functional aspects. • As an innovation diffuses through a consumer population, astandard model of innovation may emerge and speed the adoption process. Example: TQM diffused through US firm, it become standardized. • The widespread diffusion of innovations often requires development of complementary products. • In order instances changes in an innovation make possible new applications, thereby facilitating its adoption beyond the originally conceived scope of its application.

  12. Mechansim of Diffusion

  13. Mechanisms of diffusion Two mechanisms by which an innovation propagates through an adopter population • Technology Substitution • Bandwagon Effect

  14. 1. Technology Substitution • The key that unlocks the doors of an adopter population for the propagation of an innovation is TECHNOLOGY SUBSTITUTION. • Technology substitution refers to the actual substitution of a new technique for the old. Many times, a new technology or an innovation displaces an already existing technique or technology during the process of being adopted.

  15. 2. Bandwagon Effect • Bandwagon effect focuses on the dynamic by which later adopters, in their decision to adopt an innovation, imitate the behavior of earlier adopters. • The experience with the use of an innovation increase as each successive member in the potential adopter population adopts it.

  16. Model of InnovationAdoption

  17. 5 steps the decision process The decision process that leads either an individual or a firm to adopt an innovation involve five step: • Awareness • Attitude formation • Decision • Implementation • Confirmation.

  18. 1. PROBLEM RECOGNITION 2. TECHNOLOGY SELECTION 3. SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT • Characteristics • Of the Decision- • Making Unit • Socioeconomic Factor • Personality Variables • Communication Behavior 4. IMPLEMENTATION 5. CONFIRMATION 1. Knowledge 2. Attitude Formation 3. Decision 4. Implemen- tation 5. Confirma- tion Adoption Relative Advantage Compatibility Complexity Trialability Observability Rejection STAGES IN DECISION TO ADOPT

  19. Shifting Characteristics of Adopters Over Time • Innovator • Early adopters • Early majority • Late majority • Laggard

  20. DEFFERENCES AMONG ADOPTER CATEGORIES

  21. Relative importance of decision stage There are two major reasons for the problem of implementation in an organization rather than an individual: • In an organization, a number of individuals are usually involved in the innovation-decision process, and the implementers are often a different set of people from the decision makers. • The organization structure that gives stability and continuity to an organization often resists the implementation of an innovation.

  22. Factors that drive the process of diffusion • Attribute of an innovation • Community effects and network externalities • Characteristics of the population through which diffusion occurs

  23. 1. Attribute of innovation • Relative advantage is the degree to which an innovation is perceived as being better than the idea it supercedes. • Compatibility is the degree to which an innovation is perceived as being consistent with existing values or past experiences an needs of potential adopters. • Complexityis the degree to which an innovation is perceived as being difficult to understand an use • Trialabilityis the degree to which an innovation may be experimented with on a limited basis • Observabilityis the degree to which the results of an innovation are available to other.

  24. Component of an Innovation • Hardware • Software • Evaluation Information

  25. Components Attributes Hardware Realtive Advantage Complexity Software Compatibility Trialability Evaluation Information Observability COMPONENTS OF AN INNOVATION MAPPED TO ATTRIBUTES

  26. 2. Community Effect Four major factors drives community effect: • Prior technology drag • Irreversibility of investments • Sponsorship • Expectations

  27. 2. Community Effect Four major factors drives community effect: • Prior technology drag : When a prior technology exists that has already developed a mature adoption network, the disparity in short-term benefits between the old and new technologies is likely to be large, even though the new technology may hold more promise in the long term. • Irreversibility of investments: When adoption of an innovation requires irreversible investments in areas such as product training and accumulative project experience, it enhances the risk of adoption. • Sponsorship: This refers to the existence of a single entity (person, organization, consortium) to define the technology, set standards, subsidize early adopters, and otherwise promote adoption of the new technology. • ExpectationsIf enough firms hold positive expectations about a technology’s chances for dominance, then the technology is likely to enjoy a long honeymoon period, and the adoption is facilitated.

  28. 3. Characteristic of The Population • Communication: Information reduces uncertainty for the adopter. • Opinion leaders: Are individual who influence others’ opinions about innovations. Most ideas enter and diffuse through a population because of its opinion leaders. • Cultural norms: They define a range of tolerable behavior, serve as a guide for the individuals, and are typified by opinion leaders. Norms may impede or speed the diffusion of innovations.

  29. Influence of Environmental Trends on Diffusion • As a result of globalization, the potential adopters during the diffusion of any innovation are located all over the world. • Time compression in diffusion requires rapid responses by firms in three areas: 1. redesign of the evaluation information component of the innovation, 2. adjustment of their marketing strategies, and 3. adoption of relevant innovations faster than their competitor • The potential for technology integration in both process and product arenas is inducing firms to look outside their own organization for appropriate innovations as complements to their in-house development activity

  30. Managerial Implication • Significant attention should be devoted to obtaining market feedback over the course of diffusion in the case of new product or process introductions. • Implementation is a challenging task and should be manaed carefully. • Product design and marketing strategy should reinforce each other as a firm rolls out a new product or process. • Manager should line up sponsors and create expectation of a technology success to take advantage of community effects in diffusion.

  31. PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGY CHANGE: DIFFUSION In 1965, Dr. Richard Carlson analyzed the spread of modern math among school administrators in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. He studied the opinion leadership pattern related to modern math among school superintendents, characteristics of the innovation, and its rate of adoption. Carlson’s study produced impressive insights about the diffusion networks through which modern math spread from school to school in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (this county is the metropolitan area for Pittsburgh). Carlson conducted personal interviews with each of the 38 superintendents who headed these school systems, asking each (1) in what year they had adopted modern math, (2) which other superintendents were their best friends, and (3) for certain other data. Modern math entered the local educational scene of Allegheny County by means of one school superintendent, who adopted in 1958. This innovator traveled widely outside the Pittsburgh area, but he was an isolate in the local network; none of the 37 other school administrators talked to him. The S-shaped diffusion curve din not take off until 1959—after a clique of six superintendents adopted; these six included three main opinion leaders in the system. The rate of adoption then began to climb rapidly. There was only one adopter in 1958 (the innovator), five by the end of 1959, 15 by 1960, 27 by 1961, 35 by 1962, and all 38 superintendents had adopted by the end of 1963. Thus, modern math spread to 100-percent adoption in about five years. The cosmopolite innovator was too innovative to serve as an appropriate role model for the other superintendents. They waited to adopt until the opinion leaders in the six-member clique favored the innovation.

More Related